Get a job in games graphic

Level up your career

Learn about working in games

Sign up to the GI Jobs board

View jobs board

Making the games industry a better place to work

See best places to work
Get a job in games graphic

Sony's H1Z1 plagued by technical issues at launch

Zombie survival shooter is the latest big game to stumble badly at launch

Sony Online Entertainment's H1Z1 has become the latest in a string of recent games to launch with significant online performance issues.

The zombie survival MMO's problems became apparent almost immediately after it was released on January 15. Login problems were widely reported, as was the ability to actually see active servers. There were also performance issues for those that made it into the game, including low framerates, no voice chat, and slow responsiveness among the zombie NPCs, among others.

SOE president John Smedley's Twitter feed has been a blur of updates and apologies since then, with the H1Z1 team working throughout the weekend.

More stories

John Smedley steps down as Daybreak CEO

Did the executive's ongoing tussle with hackers take its toll?

By Dan Pearson

PlanetSide 2 creative director resigns

Latest executive to depart after SOE becomes Daybreak

By Rachel Weber

Latest comments (10)

Jim Webb Executive Editor/Community Director, E-mpire Ltd. Co.6 years ago
"A delayed game is eventually good. A bad game is bad forever." - Shigeru Miyamoto (1996).

""F*** it. Ship it. We'll fix it next year....maybe. They'll buy it anyway." - The industry (2006).
10Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
John Nejady Associate Producer, CCP Games6 years ago
Your link to the Reddit thread isn't working for me.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Chris Eckersley FQA TRC Tester, SCEE Studio Liverpool6 years ago
The game is in Early Access (you should probably mention this in the article). It's in a pretty bad state, more so than some other Early Access games, but I think it's a bit premature to declare it "the latest big game to stumble badly at launch".
4Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (10)
Brook Davidson Artist / 3D design 6 years ago
I think early access is the wrong move to make for most games. Many companies treat it as if it's the official launch of the game, and that is what makes it look really bad. Not to mention when you make it open to the public, the public is going to expect a certain quality regardless of early access or not. Especially if they payed for it.
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Daniel Trezub QA Analyst, Ludia6 years ago
"They will buy it anyway" is the key phrase on this entire page.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Andrew Jakobs Lead Programmer 6 years ago
The weirdest part in this is, you'll pay money now, even though it's free on actual release...

And early access means it's an alpha/beta game, but that's something people don't seem to understand..
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Pin Wang CEO & Co-Founder, Substantial Games6 years ago
Agreed. This is exactly what Early Access is for!

We shouldn't lump SOE into the same group as these other guys if they are communicating this to the players properly, and if they continue to communicate which it seems they are.
4Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Morville O'Driscoll Blogger & Critic 6 years ago
Login problems were widely reported, as was the ability to actually see active servers.
This has nothing to do with Early Access... Performance issues, sure, but server issues? Hell no. That's, once again, a company failing to understand demand.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Andrew Wilson 3D Artist 6 years ago
"Players should anticipate an evolving feature set, bugs, incomplete content, missing features, and potentially game breaking issues."
Why would you buy a game that explicitly states this in the marketing and then complain about those exact problems?
3Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Greg Wilcox Creator, Destroy All Fanboys! 6 years ago
@Andrew: maybe because some gamers seem to not be able to read past the "Ooh, it's got ZOMBEEZ in it and you shoot them!" part. Whatever happened to closed testing with people who can be told of and will be used to the issues early access games have and can not only deal with them, but correctly report them so they can be ironed out on the road to actual release dates?

Allowing the public to play games that aren't up to what they "expect" even though it's NOT indicative of the final product at all is a bad idea. Particularly in this age of a handful of dopes who SHOULD know the difference between an incomplete experience and a more polished final.

Of course, given that a bunch of so-called completed games have the "Faw down, go BOOM!" thing happening within their launch windows, maybe every new game needs to be called "Early Access" until that gets sorted out.

Ha and ha-ha.

I think.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.