Korean publishers block gambling investigation - report

Game Ratings Board says publishers are withholding information on "jackpot items"

The South Korean Game Rating Board (GRB) has accused MMO publishers of obstructing an investigation.

According to a report on This Is Game, The GRB wants to establish whether the in-game purchase of "jackpot items" - where the player pays a set amount in return for a random item of potentially greater value - is a form of gambling.

Ten MMO publishers were asked to provide details of similar items in their games: Neowiz, Smile Gate, CJ, WeMade, NCsoft, Actoz Soft, Mgame, NHN, Nexon, and HanbitSoft.

However, while all of the publishers have co-operated on item names, costs and virtual currencies involved in the transactions, they are refusing to provide information on payout percentages.

The publishers involved believe that the information is primarily associated with their business models, and does not fall under the jurisdiction of a ratings board.

The Korean industry is supposed to self-regulate on gambling by following a set of criteria established in 2008, but the GRB has openly questioned whether MMO publishers are still doing so.

"Game companies ask us why GRB tries to touch their business model and refuse to our request. But the jackpot item is a content of the game," said GRB chairman Soo Keun Lee.

"We don't care whatever they do outside of the game but what is matter to us is that it is a part of the game. There should have been no problem if they have followed the criteria they have made by themselves. But we doubt if they are abiding by it now. To us, it is nothing more than a dead recommendation."

Related stories

"There's no excuse for unequal pay"

Leading UK games organisations discuss the importance of ensuring employees of any gender are paid fairly as claims against major non-games firms rise

By James Batchelor

Star Control creators file counterclaim against Stardock

Fred Ford and Paul Reiche III seek an injunction, but Stardock CEO responds that its ownership position is "incontestable"

By Matthew Handrahan

Latest comments (2)

Doug McFarlane Co-Owner, KodeSource6 years ago
I wouldn't consider this gambling if the average overall awarded item value is larger than what was paid.

Gambling IMO is when the 'house' takes in more money than it pays out, with the lure being the potential to win something large.

Since it's virtual goods anyways, to be safe they could always make sure the player receives an item at least worth what he/she paid, therefore there is no 'gambling'. Just a smart business model.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Edward Buffery Head of LQA (UK), Testronic6 years ago
I'd like to know what the relation is between the virtual currency cost, the estimated (virtual) value of the item, and real currency. Do players buy virtual currency for real money (whether legally or illegally), then gamble it for items that only have virtual worth?

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Edward Buffery on 6th October 2011 3:08pm

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.