Sections

New Wii patent case due next year

Motiva files second infringement case against Nintendo

A trial date has been set for Ohio motion control firm Motiva's second patent infringement case against Nintendo.

The company claims that the Wii treads on the toes of its 2005 patents for a "human movement measurement system," which cover devices including a wireless handheld controller.

Motiva also filed charges against Nintendo in 2008, which resulted in a court-ordered re-examination of the patents in question and the closure of the case.

The new case is due an initial determination of November 4 next year, reports the ITC, with a final decision by March 2012.

Motiva's goal is a permanent cease and desist order against Nintendo of America.

Despite holding the disputed patents, Motiva has yet to release to market any product based on them.

Related stories

Pokémon Sword & Shield are the fastest-selling games in the franchise's history

Switch duo sells six million copies worldwide in first week of release

By James Batchelor

Paid subscriptions coming to Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp

UPDATE: Nintendo follows Mario Kart subscription with two tiers for Animal Crossing amounting to $10.98 per month

By Haydn Taylor

Latest comments (5)

Michael O'callaghan Studying MA Computer Games Art (Character), Teesside University9 years ago
"cease and desist" as if...
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Andrew Goodchild Studying development, Train2Game9 years ago
The case was closed in 2008? Why do they think it has a better chance now?
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Why is the patent office allowing such ridiculously broad concepts to be patented? We saw this not too long ago with that idiot who was trying to enforce a patent for drop-down menus in websites (not for the code, just for the idea).

Seriously. There need to be a few more tech-savvy folks down there.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (5)
I smell more money being ordered to be paid to Nintendo...

And "human movement measurement system," - doesn't that sound slightly more "Kinect-ish"?
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Andrew Goodchild Studying development, Train2Game9 years ago
@Michael. As a patent needs some technical/implementation detail, if his patent involved a remote rather than camara recognition, it has nothing to do with Kinect, whether move was subject would depend onhow similar any of the included tech was.

But if the case was dismissed before, after re examining patents, that suggests that the first judge decided either the Wii was not close enough, or the bits that were were not clearly new tech when put in the patent.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.