SCEE president: Gamergate "absolutely horrible"

How Jim Ryan intends to tackle hate group at PlayStation

Sony Computer Entertainment Europe president and CEO Jim Ryan has spoken out publicly against Gamergate, and said the company should be aiming to set an example.

"I think the GamerGate thing is absolutely horrible," he said in an interview with Metro, adding that more women were playing games than ever before.

However, he continued to say that SCEE hadn't seen a need to counter the vitriol of Gamergate with any schemes to encourage more female gamers or developers.

"I don't think you can or should discriminate one way or the other. Quotas in boardrooms, quotas in sporting teams, I personally don't believe that these are the right way to achieve a world where discrimination is not prevalent," he said.

"I think if you talk about this organisation, I think all that I should do is to set an example at the top. And indicate that any behaviour that is remotely inappropriate in this area will not be tolerated."

Last year developer Zoe Quinn called for the industry's biggest companies to speak out against the actions of Gamergate,

"When people that are prominent in the industry can stand up and say 'I'm part of games, I love games, this hate mob doesn't speak for me, this is not welcome in games', it has the twofold effect of making it less damaging to those that this can hurt, and it does something to repair this horrible misrepresentation of this medium that so many of us love," she said in October.

"Condemning them and saying they do not speak for games - it's so fundamental, otherwise this is going to keep happening."

More stories

Sony UK marketing boss Rich Keen departing in November

Exec leaving “to pursue another opportunity in the industry”

By James Batchelor

Job losses at Sony London as first VR project wraps up

Compulsory redundancies means risk of "losing high calibre staff"

By Dan Pearson

Latest comments (1)

Alfonso Sexto Lead Tester, Ubisoft Germany7 years ago
I know some Gamergate supporters inside the industry and they all say the same; that "it's not about harassment, but ethics and fighting corruption" and that "those making noise are a few idiots that got attracted by it, it happens everywhere"
I keep answering that when you accept those idiots because their presence is "something that happens" you can no longer talk about "ethics" nor about others "corruption" when their presence translates as a proof that the movement (let's call it that way) has a source of corruption inside of it.

Personally, I dislike GG since I personally find the vision of "our identity as gamer" that a lot of them claim as something ridiculous. What do they mean as "Identity as gamer"? I'm 34, I was already playing Pac-man when I was 3 y/o and I never felt that gaming, my main hobby, had anything to do with who I am, my essence, my identity or whatever. How many identity's I have, then? an "Identity as world traveler", another "identity as anime fan", "identity as a goth night-clubber?" Sorry, I just can't support that mentality.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Alfonso Sexto on 26th February 2015 12:31pm

6Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.