Sections

Crytek sues Star Citizen developers

Alleges Cloud Imperium is still using CryEngine, but studio will "defend vigourously" against "meritless lawsuit"

Engine provider Crytek has filed a lawsuit against the two companies behind crowdfunding success Star Citizen, accusing the developers of breaching their contract in multiple ways.

The suit is against both Cloud Imperium Games and Roberts Space Industries and was filed in the US district court of California, Polygon reports. The main crux of the allegations is that Crytek believes the studios are still using its CryEngine technology.

Last year, CIG and RSI announced they were dropping CryEngine 3 in favour of Amazon Lumberyard - which is, in fact, built on CryEngine after the retail giant signed a licensing deal that saved Crytek from its financial struggles. (Interestingly, Cloud Imperium's decision to switch engines came amidst similar financial turmoil for Crytek last year).

Crytek claims that marketing materials for Star Citizen show lives of code on a screen that indicate the game is still powered on CryEngine 3 - or at least part of it still is.

The firm also alleges that CIG and RSI has removed the CryEngine logo from the game's start-up sequence - improperly so if the game is still running on its tech - and that the team has modified the engine without properly disclosing this to Crytek as part of the original licensing agreement.

Finally, since CIG and RSI has begun selling Star Citizen as two separate games - the single-player Squadron 42 campaign and the multiplayer Star Citizen Persistent Universe - Crytek is alleging that this is a further breach of contract as it constitutes as using the engine twice.

Crytek is suing for damages, both direct and indirect, and a permanent injunction to prevent both companies from continuing to use CryEngine.

A representative of CIG and RSI sent the following statement to Polygon: "We are aware of the Crytek complaint having been filed in the US District Court. CIG hasn't used the CryEngine for quite some time since we switched to Amazon's Lumberyard.

"This is a meritless lawsuit that we will defend vigorously against, including recovering from Crytek any costs incurred in this matter."

Nonetheless, the lawsuit could have a serious impact on the development of Star Citizen - particularly if Crytek's claims prove to be true. The game has already been in development for five years, raised more than $173m in backer funding, and has still yet to deliver much of what was originally promised.

Crytek itself, or at least one of its studios, is also facing its own lawsuit when its former Istanbul head of game operations demanded his unpaid severance package.

Related stories

Cloud Imperium Games responds to Crytek suit

Star Citizen studio calls CryEngine maker's complaint misleading and scandalous, saying it "sacrifices legal sufficiency for loud publicity"

By Brendan Sinclair

Star Citizen developers raised $34.9m in 2017

For the second year in a row, Star Citizen crowd-sourced more money than all games on Kickstarter combined

By Haydn Taylor

Latest comments (2)

colin merrick Engineer/Artist A month ago
Sounds like Crytek are skint again and need money to pay their employees 😂
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Joe.Blobers Surveyor, Satsuma Droid13 days ago
Here is an update. We are now +21 days after this new “drama”. CIG has answered to Crytek lawsuit... and without surprise, once again, the "drama" turned to be the biggest joke of all past "drama" :)

Here are all the filed documents available on one single place:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1mPjfXrjAf9RUq3_5cJgd-hF-I5XoCQta

Of course, that is not the end of the story. Crytek will obviously claim that breach of contract are real…. but I can’t resist to copy sir Voroxpete’s comments:

<blockquote>
Highlights:

* CryTek attempted to sue RSI even though RSI didn’t actually exist when CIG negotiated the original agreement. They only created that company a few years later as a publicity arm for Star Citizen.
* CryTek tried to accuse Ortwin of not recusing himself even though he actually got a waiver from CryTek before negotiating the agreement. Owned.
* CryTek never showed the court the actual agreement they claim CIG violated, because it flat out disproves all of their claims.
* The agreement clearly states that CIG can use CryEngine for both Star Citizen and Squadron 42. Slam dunk.
* The claim that CIG has some kind of duty to only use CryEngine and nothing else is basically total bullshit, and really obvious bullshit at that. Like, we’re talking “A first year law student could spot that this case has no merit” levels of bullshit. CryTek are asking the court to ignore almost a century of established law in order to accept their interpretation of “exclusive”.
* As any sane person would expect, the whole “removing CryTek logos and copyright notices” thing is ridiculous because they only took them off after they stopped using CryEngine.
In short, CIG have unleashed the Ortwin. CryTek got rekt.
</blockquote>

In short, we see the reason why the complaint was amended to list everything as being done ‘intentionally’… Then CIG goes and drops a metric ass-ton (that’s bigger than an Imperial ass-ton) of case-law into why that wont fly…. :)
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.