Sections Valve's new stance on content "ridiculous" and "out of touch"

Leaf Corcoran says "ban buttons are ready" to keep hateful content off founder Leaf Corcoran has described Valve's new open-door policy on Steam content as "ridiculous" and "out of touch", voicing concerns that the shift will result in a variety of problematic content proliferating on Valve's store.

Valve announced its new outlook yesterday, in a statement on the Steam blog that said it would, "allow everything onto the Steam Store, except for things that we decide are illegal, or straight up trolling." The shift followed a variety of incidents that created uncertainty around content standards, most recently a number of visual novels with adult themes receiving official warnings.

However, Valve's response has attracted criticism from the founder of, an indie-friendly storefront intended to be an alternative to Steam. Speaking on Twitter yesterday, founder Leaf Corcoran pulled no punches in his assessment.

"A platform that allows 'everything, unless it's illegal or straight up trolling' is ridiculous," Corcoran said. "Please keep your malicious, derogatory, discriminatory, bullying, harassing, demeaning content off []. Our ban buttons are ready."

After seeing responses to his post flood in, Corcoran added: "It's sad that most of the people in that thread are worried about asset flips. What about the fact that Valve is effectively authorizing toxic people to exist on their platform? It's so out of touch."

Indeed, when we spoke to Corcoran in May last year, he anticipated just this kind of shift on Valve's part. "I have a strong feeling that Steam will probably be completely open sometime in the future," he said, "but they're just trying to work up to that."

In an article published yesterday, we spoke the developers caught up in Valve's recent crackdown on games with adult themes, many of which had been on Steam for a long time, and had milder adult content than other games that escaped warnings. In every case, the developers were critical of Valve's "ad hoc" approach to content standards, and suggested it has a "chilling" effect on the kind of games being made.

"I've talked to one Valve rep, and I'm like, 'I want to put this kind of content on Steam,' and the Valve rep responded, 'Yeah, that seems okay, I'll let you know if we change our mind.' Which doesn't provide any certainty," said Robert Yang, a developer whose games explore gay culture and gay experience. "It puts developers in a weird position because we have to guess how Valve's mind will change on something. It's like three layers of guessing.

"I almost kind of wish Valve would tell me 'no, that content will never be allowed on Steam ever', because at least that would be certainty. That's the reality; they don't want to do heavy content moderation, but then they end up making these random decisions that don't benefit anyone."

This new development is apparent proof that Steam does not want to "do heavy content moderation". However, in stepping away from the issue entirely, Valve is responding to games about school shootings and games about consensual sex and desire as if they present the same problem.

Our North American editor, Brendan Sinclair, explored this issue in more depth in a column published yesterday - you can read that by following this link.

More stories decries NFTs, calls them "a scam"

Indie hosting site says "f*ck any company that says they support creators and also endorses NFTs in any way"

By Danielle Partis Palestinian Aid bundle raises over $900,000

Over 97,000 people contributed to the week-long fundraiser

By Danielle Partis

Latest comments (5)

Dariusz G. Jagielski Game Developer 4 years ago
You either want things like Huniepop or Radiator on Steam or you don't want things like Active shooter. One or the other.

Censorship is a slippery slope - sure right now you may want to just ban hateful content, but what next? Content that makes fun or your favorite politician or media person? Content that is a cool game and not hateful or bigoted on its own removed only because of the developer's worldview?
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Damian Community Manager 4 years ago
"Please keep your malicious, derogatory, discriminatory, bullying, harassing, demeaning content off []. Our ban buttons are ready."

Meanwhile on
Lesbian Spider-Queens of Mars


Edited 2 times. Last edit by a moderator on 8th June 2018 12:03pm

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
@Damian: of all the examples you could have picked,you picked a queered Wizard Of Wor tribute game by one of the smartest developers working games.

Well done there.
3Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (5)
Dan Pearson Product Marketing Manager, Genvid4 years ago
@Dariusz G. Jagielski: Is it really so hard to separate games which are exploring sexuality and those which are glorifying the murder of children? Feels like a pretty clear moral divide if you ask me. Morality based censorship is in no way black and white - it doesn't have to be an all or nothing scenario. Yes, it's arbitrary to a certain degree, but there seems like a clear line between what's risque and what's malevolent.
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Damian Community Manager 4 years ago
@Robert Fearon: You're welcome. Just stating that the way it's presented might not fit the standard by which although common to you might not be appropriate to casual audiences especially younger gamers. There are no age gates to prevent access that part of the page. Just click on the under 15 bucks category and poof there it is.

I didn't question the incompetency of the developer, just whether or not this one slid past the ban hammer eyes or whether like you stated, it gets a "free pass" for whatever reason you want to give it. Show this game's title and cover image to a broader audience and see whether they agree or not it is "derogatory, discriminatory, bullying, harassing, or demeaning".

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Damian on 8th June 2018 4:45pm

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.