FCC votes to dismantle net neutrality

ESA "disappointed" as US governing body votes 3-2 to abandon rule preventing service providers from blocking traffic

Net neutrality in the US is in danger. The Federal Communications Commission today voted 3-2 to overturn the 2015 rule prohibiting ISPs from blocking, throttling or prioritizing Internet traffic.

The topic has been a heated one in games for some time, as many games rely upon low latency, high bandwidth connections that ISPs may become more aggressive about monetizing. With net neutrality eliminated, ISPs would be free to charge the companies running these games a premium to ensure their traffic gets priority.

"The Federal Communications Commission today voted to restore the longstanding, bipartisan light-touch regulatory framework that has fostered rapid Internet growth, openness, and freedom for nearly 20 years," the FCC said in announcing the rollback. "Following detailed legal and economic analysis, as well as extensive examination of comments from consumers and stakeholders, the Commission reversed the FCC's 2015 heavy-handed utility-style regulation of broadband Internet access service, which imposed substantial costs on the entire Internet ecosystem... The framework adopted by the Commission today will protect consumers at far less cost to investment than the prior rigid and wide-ranging utility rules. And restoring a favorable climate for network investment is key to closing the digital divide, spurring competition and innovation that benefits consumers."

The Entertainment Software Association objected to the ruling in a statement provided to, saying, "As an industry that has relied on internet protections to deliver exciting, innovative video games to fans around the world, ESA is disappointed that the FCC's order fails to prohibit blocking, throttling, and other anti-competitive conduct on the internet. Reasonable safeguards for broadband users and edge providers are needed to ensure that economic growth and technological advancement continue."

Net neutrality proponents aren't ready to abandon the fight yet. New York attorney general A.G. Schneiderman has already said he plans to lead a multistate lawsuit to prevent the rollback of net neutrality. Schneiderman had already begun an investigation into the FCC's public comment period on net neutrality, during which he found some 2 million comments posted using stolen identities. He along with more than a dozen other state attorneys general called upon the FCC to delay their vote in light of the findings.

"Today's new rule would enable ISPs to charge consumers more to access sites like Facebook and Twitter and give them the leverage to degrade high quality of video streaming until and unless somebody pays them more money," Schneiderman said in a statement. "Even worse, today's vote would enable ISPs to favor certain viewpoints over others."

FCC commissioner Mignon Clyburn, one of the two dissenting commissioners, emphasized that point in her own statement about the vote.

"Particularly damning is what today's repeal will mean for marginalized groups, like communities of color, that rely on platforms like the internet to communicate, because traditional outlets do not consider their issues or concerns, worthy of any coverage," Clyburn said. "It was through social media that the world first heard about Ferguson, Missouri, because legacy news outlets did not consider it important until the hashtag started trending.

"It has been through online video services, that targeted entertainment has thrived, where stories are finally being told because those same programming were repeatedly rejected by mainstream distribution and media outlets. And it has been through secure messaging platforms, where activists have communicated and organized for justice without gatekeepers with differing opinions blocking them."

Related stories

Stardock responds to Star Control designers' settlement offer claims

Developer's VP shares original proposal, clarifies company's position on Star Control IP rights

By James Batchelor

Star Control legal battle intensifies as alleged settlement offer surfaces

Stardock's "unfathomable" demands reportedly include surrender of IP rights, a public apology, $225,000 and a five-year development ban

By James Batchelor

Latest comments (6)

Dariusz G. Jagielski Game Developer 3 months ago
I think any US gamers that are worried about the issues that surely will come should move to Canada or Europe where we still have sane rules. For example, in Poland if some ISP would try throttling certain sites or services, UKE (Polish equivalent of FCC) would be momentarily on their asses and penalties counted in millions would follow. Not to mention that in Poland average connection speed is 20mbps (though it's quickly rising to around 60mbps and 100mbps+ connections are pretty common too) and data plans is something you only see in mobile providers.

The only downside of moving to Poland is that our gov is currently run by fascists, but that's something that will be resolved pretty soon. They're very incompetent fascists, you see.
2Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Klaus Preisinger Freelance Writing 3 months ago
Do not fight the FCC for the amusement of those controlling it. Start the lobbying machine to get a law passed in a reasonable timeframe.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Dariusz G. Jagielski Game Developer 3 months ago
@Klaus Preisinger: That law will be written by Comrizon&T anyway so what's the point of doing it?
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (6)
Klaus Preisinger Freelance Writing 3 months ago
So all those tech companies of silicon valley potentially suffer from this and they have no influence? Until the end of time? Or are they just banking on Trumps successor to unravel all of Trumps orders in the same way Trumps unraveled Obama? That is no future proof strategy either.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Dariusz G. Jagielski Game Developer 3 months ago
The thing is Comrizon&T combined have more money and influence than all of the opposing companies combined.
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Alfonso Sexto Lead Tester, Ubisoft Germany3 months ago
@Dariusz G. Jagielski: It's not about the money, but influence, although I believe that Netlix, Amazon, EA and Facebook alone have far more money than them, they also have a higher influence.
I'm still confident that this will be dropped in court, as long as AT LEAST the court listens to the will of that 80%+ of Americans against this law, (since those politicians didn't do that vital part of their job)
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.