Close
Report Comment to a Moderator Our Moderators review all comments for abusive and offensive language, and ensure comments are from Verified Users only.
Please report a comment only if you feel it requires our urgent attention.
I understand, report it. Cancel

Habbo investors dump shares over grooming investigation

Habbo investors dump shares over grooming investigation

Tue 12 Jun 2012 10:51am GMT / 6:51am EDT / 3:51am PDT
Financial

Balderton Capital said to drop 13% stake in Sulake over pending C4 expose UPDATE: Sulake CEO responds as more details emerge from Channel 4

Update

Sulake CEO Paul LaFontaine has issued a further statement to GamesIndustry International regarding the Channel 4 investigation and the withdrawal of investors.

"I was incredibly concerned to see this report and to hear about the findings of the Channel Four News investigation. As a parent, I understand the critical importance of making sure teenagers and young people have a safe online experience," said LaFontaine.

"I was sorry to hear of Balderton's decision to withdraw its involvement, but my priority right now is to address the issues raised by the investigation. In response to Ben's report, I would like to reassure readers that we at Sulake remain fully committed to the Habbo community and to resolving the issues it currently faces.

"Habbo has a strong record in this area with industry commendations and deep experience experience actively preventing potentially damaging content. Since hearing about the report I have asked my team to tighten security across the site and to strengthen the user rules even further.

I want to take this opportunity to assure our site users that I will be working with my team globally to deliver improved safety levels across the community. Anyone who is concerned can contact me directly on Twitter @PaulLaFo."

LaFontaine also urged anyone with concerns over the safety of Habbo Hotel to read the statement previously issued on the company blog.

Channel 4 has also revealed more information on its investigation into Habbo, documenting the experiences of a journalist who spent two months playing the game online.

"Seemingly innocent, Habbo Hotel, with its bright colours, pink teddy bears, flashing lights, and roaming ponies, is one of a growing number of virtual worlds created for kids," reads a channel 4 release. "And with 10 million unique visitors a month, it is 'the world's largest social game and online community for teenagers'."

"The chat was very sexual, perverse, violent, pornographic, overtly sexual acts, people saying they were going to do things to others, and it was very graphic," said investigator Rachel Seifert.

"Within two minutes I was being asked individually 'do you have a webcam?', 'can we chat on (instant messenger service) MSN, on Skype?' I was also within a couple of minutes asked to strip, fully naked, and asked what would I do on a webcam."

Channel 4 news also employed the services of John Carr, "one of the world's leading experts on child safety."

"A moderator should be jumping in right now as it's not hard to see where this is going before it gets a lot worse," said Carr, watching Seifert's online experiences in Habbo Hotel. "This is very worrying and going in a very bad direction."

"Here's someone aged 11 being asked to leave the site. There should be the equivalent of the virtual fire-brigade on this, but it's not happening.

"If I was a parent of an 11-year old girl on this site, I would want there to be a moral panic. This should not be happening. What I've just seen makes me think this is a dangerous place for youngsters to be.

"Businesses shouldn't put children at risk. If they are in this business, they have to be in it in the right way - the right moderators, the right software, to stop this happening."

Original story

Major shareholders in Sulake, the company which runs children's social network Habbo Hotel, are reportedly returning their investment in the firm after learning of an impending Channel 4 expose of grooming in the site's chat rooms.

The story is being reported by The Kernel, with the presumably somewhat over-sexed headline of "Habbo Exposed as Paedophile Haven".

According to that story, Balderton Capital, which owns a thirteen per cent stake in Sulake, is returning its investment in the company after learning of a news investigation into chatroom behaviour due to be broadcast at 7pm tonight on Channel 4 in the UK.

In that investigation, its believed that allegations will be made that active grooming of 14 year olds is taking place on the site, alongside the usual low-level grotesque commentary which plagues so many such facilities.

"This is a space we know very well, as investors in several other similar companies, for example Bebo and Weeworld," reads a statement which The Kernel attributes to Balderton.

"We were given some information a week ago that profoundly shocked us. We had to ask ourselves whether we were comfortable being investors in a business where children were not being adequately protected.

"We didn't take this decision lightly, as we have been investors in Sulake for over 8 years, but the standards required to run a website that children have access to are very high. We felt the company was not meeting those standards."

Sulake CEO Paul LaFontaine has issued a statement on the company site which obliquely addresses the general issues of freedom of expression and Sulake's responsibility for content, but does not expressly deal with the withdrawal of any investor support.

"Speaking as a CEO, it's an incredibly rewarding job to have responsibility for an online community like Habbo," says LaFontaine. "Our site provides a forum for millions of young people from across the world to share views, interests and ideas through the characters they create.

"The freedom to explore the site and freely interact with other users is one of the reasons why we are one of the most popular online destinations for teenagers; there have been more than 265 million Habbo users in total and up to a further three million users join each month.

"To keep users safe, we filter content and block inappropriate users. We also employ more than 225 moderators, tracking some 70 million lines of conversation globally every day on a 24/7 basis.

"We work with child safety organisations and local police forces to address inappropriate behaviour. Habbo's leading safety systems were recognised as making the service one of the safest social networks in a 2011 European Commission report. Last year we were also awarded the commendation of 'Safer by Design' from the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP).

"Alongside the time and resource we invest to ensure that Habbo is one of the safest online communities, we also encourage our users to take responsibility for reporting any abuses on the site. This is why we provide education and rapid-response support to users who may experience uncomfortable conversations."

Other sources in the Kernel story have questioned the wisdom of Balderton dumping the investment, calling it "cowardly".

"Assigning culpability to Sulake for illegal activity on Habbo is something equivalent to blaming eBay for rogue sellers," said an unnamed source.

"Habbo is a platform business with some moral responsibility for activity on its network, but it cannot be expected to police every transaction. And the company has not broken any law."

Both Balderton and Sulake have been contacted for confirmation and further comment, but have so far not made a response.

6 Comments

Peter Dwyer Games Designer/Developer

482 293 0.6
Another one I saw coming a mile off. You don't create environments for children and then leave them to it. Microsoft learned early with it's XBox Live service and quickly moved to ban abusers no matter the age. Sony learned soon after and Nintendo don't even allow chat on any real level.

Habbo created what amounted to psychedelic pony land online and then just counted the money without even looking in on what the site was doing. It's like starting a fire in your fireplace, taking off the fireguard and then going on holiday for a few weeks. Do you really expect to come back to a house!

Posted:2 years ago

#1
Will TIGA and UKIE have to take their fair share of responsibility for not policing this aspect of the sector more? Or is this the Social Media black hole?

Posted:2 years ago

#2

Kayleigh McDougall Studying BA(Hons) Game Design and Production Management, University of Abertay Dundee

21 1 0.0
I thought they would've had more moderators for the size of the site and the age range it deals with.

But then again, it's always been like that. I had an account when I was about 14 and I saw lots of cybering going on in it. So I'm not really surprised about this article. I just wonder why this wasn't done sooner.

Posted:2 years ago

#3

Bruce Everiss Marketing Consultant

1,692 594 0.4
The inter webs really can be a very nasty place.
One ray of light is the new UK libel law that will force websites to lift anonymity.
If everyone was forced to use the net as themselves there would be 95% less of a problem. This is one of the cornerstones of Facebook's success.

Posted:2 years ago

#4
As someone who has a 14 year old daughter that uses Habbo I was very interested to watch C4 news yesterday. The 'report' was complete guff and was reminiscent of the Brasseye "Paedogeddon" episode. Poor show Channel 4.

Posted:2 years ago

#5

Stephen Woollard Online Infrastructure Specialist, Electronic Arts

146 71 0.5
A site like this is always going to be tricky to manage. Personally I wouldn't let my kids anywhere near something like that without me or the missus with them (but I'm way too over-protective - I get nervous when they go on the swings in the garden), but at the same time I think it's important for kids to have a site where they can "be themselves" and not require constant parental monitoring. The trouble is then you have to rely on the site to police everything and with that many users I don't see how that could ever be done to provide 100% security, and where kids are involved anything less that 100% just isn't enough.

I did some work on our own "Littlest Petshop Online" and that game takes the route of not allowing chat at all - players communicate through a list of in-game emotes, which for the age group it's aimed at seems to me to be the best way to do it, but for a site like this which appears to be aimed at older children, it's a real minefield of wanting to allow your kids some freedom and responsibility, but at the same time knowing that they won't be able to get themselves into any real bother.

I think we need sites like this, but at the same time the companies providing them have to provide absolutely bombproof security and that is always going to be very difficult to do.

Posted:2 years ago

#6

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now