Super Mario Run's missed opportunity

EEDAR details why a juggernaut brand is just the first step to breakout mobile success

Super Mario Run's December release has been polarizing. The game launched in over 150 countries and received over 10 million downloads on its first day, which is the highest download rate of any mobile game on day 1 by a significant margin. This number dwarfs Pokémon Go's 900 thousand downloads across three countries on its release day. Despite this extremely high rate of downloads, many investors and analysts are pessimistic about the game's chances for breakout financial success. While the powerful Nintendo brand is driving strong organic user acquisition, breakout mobile success requires strong monetization and retention as well.

Nintendo is a Super Powerful Brand among Mobile Gamers

Branding is as important in mobile gaming as ever. As the North American mobile market continues to mature, consumers have become more passive in their discovery of new games - currently, 39% of mobile gamers report that they are visiting an app storefront less than once a month and have not downloaded a game in over a month. Finding ways to help drive awareness for new titles outside of the App Store has become more important than ever, and featuring a powerful brand is one of the most effective means of achieving this goal.

Already in 2016, Pokémon Go clearly highlighted the power of branding to boost virality. Luckily for Nintendo, Super Mario Run contains one of the most popular gaming IPs in existence: Mario. EEDAR's analysis of the 2016 mobile market contains survey information from August 2016 (before Super Mario Run was announced) which shows that mobile gamers think very fondly of the Mario brand. In fact, it was the most positively viewed gaming-related brand surveyed.

Mario as a brand resonates very positively with mobile gamers. It holds a higher favorability rating than notable mobile brands such as Angry Birds and Candy Crush Saga, and it even rates higher than beloved transmedia brands such as Star Wars, Marvel, and Pokemon. Coupled with its immense brand power, Super Mario Run contains gameplay that stays true to Mario's 2D Platforming roots, with more accessible controls that are well-suited for a mobile experience. With a cooperative messaging push from Apple, it's no wonder Super Mario Run became a worldwide phenomenon at release. However, due to the game's pseudo-premium model, many in the industry are wary of its ability to generate revenue.

Super Mario Run's Free-to-Try Paid Business Model Presents Major Challenges to Monetization

Super Mario Run is a free download on the App Store, and players are able to play the first three levels for free. To unlock the rest of the game, players are asked to pay a single flat fee of $9.99, and there are no other monetization tactics present in the game. This is quite contrary to the traditional mobile standard of Free-to-Play games, where players can either slowly grind and progress through a game's content for free or choose to pay and speed up their progression.

The challenges of the premium business model in mobile are well-documented. In terms of generating revenue, there has not yet been a massive breakout success for premium games on mobile, and over 90% of iOS mobile game revenue is generated by free games. App Annie's early results show Super Mario Run generating $14 million in revenue in its first three days of release, and Nintendo confirmed that the game was downloaded over 40 million times. This places the game's conversion rate at 3.5%. Pokémon Go, the largest breakout success of 2016, generated revenues of over $600 million in its first 90 days. Even if conversion rate increased to 10% (an unheard of conversion rate for mobile), Super Mario Run will need to be downloaded on 600 million devices to reach that revenue number.

"Nintendo's strategy is still first and foremost to bring consumers into their hardware business"

Being a Mobile Market Leader Requires Strong Monetization and Retention

Super Mario Run is likely to have a sharp decline in revenue in the coming months due to its lack of ongoing monetization methods. In market-leading mobile games such as Game of War: Fire Age, players can spend thousands of dollars on in-app purchases over the course of many months. Kabam has stated that they measure retention in years rather than months because long term retention is so important to their model. In contrast, the most money Super Mario Run will ever make from any single player is $9.99. A Nintendo spokesman has stated that the company does not have any plans for future game updates.

The short term success of Pokémon Go, another title driven by a popular Nintendo brand, emphasizes the importance of retention for a mobile game. After record downloads and initial monthly revenue, the lack of significant updates and meaningful metagame opportunities have resulted in dwindling interest for the game. The top 5 titles in 2016, which feature very strong competitive metagame content, have held fairly consistent revenue earnings each month while Pokémon Go has been declining since September (The one exception being Clash of Clans, whose cannibalization challenges have been written about by EEDAR). The graph below, which utilizes EEDAR's mobile revenue database based on daily chart positioning, visually illustrates this decline:

Pokémon Go's metagame primarily focuses on joining one of the three Teams and leveling up Pokémon to take over territories. This is done by battling gyms which contain AI controlled Pokémon placed by the trainer(s) who took over the gym previously. While this appears to demonstrate proper metagame foundation, the execution has been lackluster. Players do not significantly interact with other Team members, and taking over gyms serves no broader purpose than a small individual reward. Outside of battling AI at gyms, there is no way to interact with other players via trading or trainer battles, two hallmarks of the Pokémon franchise. Coupled with the ongoing issues with the in-game Pokémon tracker, Pokémon GO has seen significant retention issues.

However, for Nintendo, It May Be All for the Switch

Despite the argument that Nintendo is leaving money on the table with Super Mario Run, the game should provide a strong boost to affinity and awareness of Nintendo as a company. This is likely where Nintendo was looking to find the most value from Super Mario Run.

With the upcoming March 2017 release of the Nintendo Switch, this boost in visibility from Super Mario Run is arriving at the perfect time for Nintendo. Nintendo's strategy is still first and foremost to bring consumers into their hardware business. EEDAR's report on the 2016 mobile market found that over 52% of mobile gamers also actively play console games. Nintendo advertising their key brands to these mobile gamers is a great way to generate interest in Nintendo's own new and existing hardware.

The recent success of Pokémon Go has shown the gains Nintendo can make on their own hardware when their most notable IP is utilized on mobile platforms. After Pokémon Go's successful release on mobile, Nintendo stated in a quarterly report that Nintendo 3DS family hardware sales were up 19% from the previous year, and they attributed this growth to Pokémon Go's success. After Pokémon Sun and Moon were released in November 2016, NPD reported that the duo had become the largest Pokémon franchise release of all time.

If the rumors of a flagship Mario title being released on the Nintendo Switch at launch are true, Super Mario Run's successful attempt at turning millions of eyes toward Nintendo just before the Switch is released with a brand new Mario game may prove to be a key factor in the new console's early adoption rate.

EEDAR's latest Deconstructing Mobile report is now available for 2016, and it provides an overview of the North American mobile gaming market, from demographic breakdowns, market sizing, behaviors and motivations, to genre performance and trends, and more. For the free version of the report, go here or email Cooper Waddell at This article was a collaboration by several EEDAR analysts in addition to the author, including Mike Schramm, Heather Nofziger, and Sartori Bernbeck.

More stories

Tappx acquires Fantasy Manager developer From The Bench

The adtech company is looking to diversify its strategy and enter the mobile games market

By Marie Dealessandri

TikTok testing gaming functionality - Report

Social media platform has been running trials in Vietnam, could roll out to more markets in third quarter

By Brendan Sinclair

Latest comments (8)

Robin Clarke Producer, AppyNation Ltd5 years ago
It's good that we're starting to get some analysis of Super Mario Run that isn't fixated on whether it's 'beating' products in a different category with different objectives.

SMR is an exceptionally successful premium mobile game that has also netted Nintendo tens of millions of user signups for their future online games and services.
5Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
It's sometimes difficult for industry & journos to halt themselves from doing the same old apples/oranges comparison. I'm sure Nintendo wish the game to make Pokemon Go! money but I'm equally sure they were aware they were not pursuing that kind of policy with SMR. As such it's really not a "mistake", Nintendo didn't "leave money on the table", they knowingly made a game with a $10 spend limit in pursuit of making a mobile game unencumbered by an economy. Because outside of wanting to out-bling the grossing charts that's an interesting thing to do. And to make. And to play.
8Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Patrick Walker VP, Insights, EEDAR5 years ago
Nintendo lost 20% of their stock price (29.4K down to 23.6K) from Dec 12 to Dec 22. For a publicly traded company, that's a "mistake" in messaging to the investment community if nothing else.
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (8)
Klaus Preisinger Freelance Writing 5 years ago
The investors are probably only looking at the Pokemon Go graph, then at the Mobile Strike graph, while complaining: "theirs goes up, why is yours going down?"
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Ian Griffiths Product Owner, Hutch5 years ago
I think that Nintendo would have performed better, financial, had they just made it a paid game. I don't think the small number of levels were particularly effective at selling the game.

Also, the always online requirement probably hurt sales. For all that the portrait mode enables the player to play on public transport, patchy signal issues experienced by most players could be an issue.

Last, the FTUE experience was pretty bad. So many screens to get to play something that you would expect to be tap and go!
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Jim Webb Executive Editor/Community Director, E-mpire Ltd. Co.5 years ago
Is it just me or are the media and investors largely missing the entire intent with this game?

It's a marketing tool for their Mario IP. Stop treating it like it's a game. It's not.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
@Patrick Walker: I'd agree & I'm sure it hurt Nintendo to see but everybody knew the game was going to be paid. It looked from the outside like the markets somehow expected Nintendo to reverse that decision before launch. What was it investors missed?
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Patrick Walker VP, Insights, EEDAR5 years ago
@Barry Meade: Yeah, Nintendo investment decisions always surprise me. For example, I was super surprised when the stock surged before people realized the company didn't own the entire Pokemon IP. This seems like pretty basic research haha.

Anecdotally, I think Nintendo is a well-known and mainstream enough company that you have investors adding it to their portfolios even though they don't really understand the complexities of F2P. So investors understand F2P in theory, but don't understand just how much higher than $10 the ARP(P)U is in a top grossing mobile game, and therefore just how astronomically high downloads and conversions would need to be to create a similar level of success for a paid game.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.