Report Comment to a Moderator Our Moderators review all comments for abusive and offensive language, and ensure comments are from Verified Users only.
Please report a comment only if you feel it requires our urgent attention.
I understand, report it. Cancel

App Store chart changes suggest new ranking algorithms

By Dan Pearson

Wed 20 Apr 2011 7:56am GMT / 3:56am EDT / 12:56am PDT

Report suggests that Apple is increasing focus on usage over downloads

Information from mobile marketing data firm Flurry suggests that Apple might have made some changes to the algorithms which govern the chart positions on the iOS App Store.

The changes are thought to have been made fairly recently, and first evidenced themselves with the rise of the Facebook app to the top of the number one position in the free downloads chart, where previously it had sat in the upper teens.

Analysts at several mobile data and ad tracking firms believe that this could be the result of Apple re-weighting the factors which govern position, giving new importance to the amount of use which apps receive once installed.

Website Inside Mobile Apps posited the change when it noticed the sudden rise up the chart of the Facebook app, which sees less downloads than many others in the chart, but is used by millions of people every day. Apple has so far refused to comment on what changes it has made, if any.

"We've been noticing changes in the Top Free rankings for at least three days now," Flurry marketing VP Peter Farago told Inside Mobile Apps. "From our point of view, Apple is absolutely considering more than just downloads, which we believe is the right direction to go in to measure the true popularity of an app."

Up until now, many companies have been paying networks like Flurry for placed downloads within other Apps, giving games high visibility in the download-centric chart and generating further downloads in turn. If Apple's rating algorithms have changed then that may no longer be such an effective strategy.

Whilst that may result in a higher quality of app, as developers attempt to retain chart position through stickiness rather than downloads, it also makes that front page much harder to break into.

If the algorithms do place as much importance on usage as the reports suggest, then the 39.5 million estimated DAU for Facebook's app are going to be hard to shift from that top spot.

Should the rumours of the changes prove to be true, they may be welcomed by many developers, who have called for changes to the current system of promoting the most downloaded titles, which many feel is prioritising throwaway games over higher quality endeavours.

From Recommendations by Taboola


James Gallagher Marketing Manager, Futuremark Corporation

30 25 0.8
DAU = daily average users? DTA (death to acronyms) in future articles, please.

There are five Facebook apps in the top 20 paid and free charts, from 3 different developers, none of them officially developed by Facebook, so the use of "the Facebook app" in the article is misleading.

Posted:5 years ago


Doug McFarlane Co-Owner, KodeSource

44 42 1.0
If this new ranking system is true, I think it defeats my main purpose of using the chart system.
As a consumer I check out the charts to see what's new and popular.

The new system would show what apps are actually being used the most overall (who needs this?). This will cause all popular and daily used apps to fill the entire chart, pushing new promising apps to the bottom and never giving them the exposure they need to become popular.

Maybe the best answer is multiple charts: Most Downloaded, Most Earnings, Most Used, Best Ranked, etc.

Posted:5 years ago


Rick Cody PBnGames-Board Member

144 14 0.1
Maybe they could add a fourth chart for Most Used apps? It makes sense and is a great chart for newcomers to check. On the other hand if what they say is true it makes no sense and is horrible for new businesses and developers.

Posted:5 years ago


Andrew Wilson 3D Artist

33 8 0.2
To me the App Store really needs a ratings chart. At the moment you have to dig through tons of terrible time-wasters to find that one niche release that's well rated.
That would be far more useful than top grossing (I can only think that serves to make expensive releases look more popular)

Posted:5 years ago


Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now