Sections

Why Licensed Games Are Finally Hot

Licensed titles are no longer synonymous with poor quality and they can be quite lucrative

For decades in the game industry, there was one sure way to spot a game that had almost no chance of becoming a critical and commercial success: Games based on a license (aside from sports licenses) were almost never a top performer. Some of them were among the very worst games (Superman 64, anyone?) you could find. A license was the hallmark of low quality gaming.

Why would licenses mean poor quality? There were many reasons, but the most important one was time. Most of the licenses you'd see were movie licenses, tied to a big-budget film that game publishers expected would have a huge audience. Work would begin on a game, but usually the movie would be coming out in two years or less. This was less than the 2-3 years a top-quality game would often take to develop... so something would have to give. Either the game would be rushed to meet the movie release, or the game would be released well after the movie had been in theaters and left. Either way, sales wouldn't be great.

A short digression here: Sports licenses have been, and continue to be, an exception when it comes to licensed games. Sure, there have been poor sports games built around licenses, but in general sports games have been much better performers than other licenses. The major reasons are that licensed sports games are created to model actual game play, so at least you're starting with a game that you know works as a game. When you start with a movie or a book, you have to figure out how to make a game out of it, which is often a very difficult task in itself. Second, licensed sports games are based on something that happens every year, so whether it takes one year or three to build your game, the license it's based on is still going strong and is a great marketing opportunity every year.

Fast-forward to the modern era of game design. Yes, AAA console or PC titles still take many years to develop, but those aren't being built around movie licenses any more. (If anything, it's going the other way, as the Warcraft and Assassin's Creed movies demonstrate.) Now, though, mobile and social games can be created in months rather than years, and thus top-quality games can be constructed on a timetable to take advantage of a major movie marketing campaign. The result is that licensed games have become both much better games, and much more profitable for the companies that publish them.

"we've seen Kim Kardashian: Hollywood rake in $50 million in its first month, and it looks like it will be worth hundreds of millions of dollars to Glu Mobile"

Look no further than a company like Kabam to see where licenses have been an effective, money-making tool. Kabam has its own IP like Kingdoms of Camelot that has done very well, but its licensed games like The Hobbit: Kingdoms of Middle Earth and Fast & Furious 6: The Game have been real moneymakers. More than that, the games have helped Kabam find new audiences for its other games.

Other game companies can show similar success with licenses, like Telltale Games. The company has been doing licensed titles for years, and finally had a breakout hit with The Walking Dead. With the success of that game, the company was able to land the license for Game of Thrones, which is very likely going to be another major hit. DeNA has been busy licensing Transformers and Marvel. Zynga has licensed Warner Bros.' Looney Tunes, as well as Tiger Woods and the NFL, as part of its new strategy to expand its audience.

Most recently, we've seen Kim Kardashian: Hollywood rake in $50 million in its first month, and it looks like it will be worth hundreds of millions of dollars to Glu Mobile. There's an example of a great way to work with the right license. Glu Mobile took an existing game, Stardom: Hollywood, that they knew worked well, and found a license that fit the game's play style very well. The game has strong appeal to Kim Kardashian's millions of fans, letting them feel like they have a closer association with Kardashian. The game's style matches the desire of the fan base, and by having a proven game and a proven license Glu Mobile minimized its risk.

How do you find and take best advantage of a license? Here are some key things to remember:

Find a licensor you can work with

Licensors can make your life a living hell, or they can be a terrific help. Choose wisely. Ask around, find out if you know other people who have dealt with a particular company on a license. Hopefully you'll hear good things, but don't be surprised if you hear some horror stories. There are licensors where approvals can take months, or endless changes can be requested, or the materials you need to proceed with your game development take weeks to show up. There are many, many ways that a licensor can make things difficult or easy. Find a licensor who will be responsive, flexible, creative, and willing to help, if you can.

Pick the right license

Kim Kardashian: Hollywood may make people look for celebrity licenses with similar social presence, but that's a shallow analysis. Other companies will no doubt be looking for similar licensing coups, but it's not as easy as just finding a celebrity with a large Twitter following. The nature of the celebrity's following has to be considered, and then that profile must be matched up with the right game. It's also true that not every celebrity will cooperate willingly in the promotion of a licensed product, even though they may benefit substantially from the success of the product. Ms. Kardashian has been promoting her game in appearances on TV and elsewhere, especially on social media, and her efforts have certainly been a large part of the game's success.

Get the terms of the deal right

Watch out for guaranteed minimums, hefty advance payments, penalty clauses and the like. Remember that in most cases, licenses are not transferable if you sell the company, and licenses may evaporate if your company gets into financial trouble. Unlike intellectual properties that you create, licenses don't add value to your company in the same way. THQ found this out the hard way.

Use licenses to build audience for your company

Yes, licenses can be a remarkably cost-effective audience acquisition tool, especially as CPI (cost per install) keeps rising. The best use of a license for your company is to leverage the audience you acquire by introducing them to your other games, especially non-licensed ones. Ideally your license was chosen to bring in people who would be inclined to play your other games. If you've got a high-profile science-fiction license that will bring in millions of players, you should have some other science-fiction games they would be interested in. Or games in other genres that have a similar play style - if they liked playing the licensed game, you should be able to introduce them to a number of your other games and get some good results. Otherwise, you're not getting the full value from your license.

Do it well, and do it swiftly

If you are going to do a licensed game, do the best job you can. Get it on the market expeditiously - if the development effort drags on too long, you risk missing the best opportunity to take advantage of the license, if there's anything time-dependent on the license.

Republished from the [a]list daily. For more, read the [a]list daily and subscribe to the newsletter to get the latest in game and entertainment marketing news, cool videos, incisive opinions, exclusive interviews and industry data.

Related stories

Japanese mobile market outgrows US three years in a row

RPGs account for 65% of mobile revenue in Japan, App Annie report shows

By Haydn Taylor

Wargaming opens new Moscow mobile studio

New branch will focus on developing midcore titles, headed up by Andrey Zimenko

By James Batchelor

Latest comments (8)

Neil Young Programmer, Rebellion Developments2 years ago
I assumed this was going to be about alien isolation and the new LotR game from the headline.

Not to diminish the examples given here, but hasn't AAA got much better at licensed titles as well? Rocksteady's batman games, and TT's lego titles spring to mind.
9Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Steve Peterson Marketing Consultant 2 years ago
Those are good examples, Neil. We've seen a string of good Batman titles that have performed quite well saleswise, as well as being good games. Sadly the Spider-Man games and Transformers games from Activision have been solid counter-examples. They aren't dreadful like some licensed games have been, but they certainly didn't set the world on fire. AAA console games based on a license are just difficult to do well, and the spotty performance over time has kept big publishers wary about investing in them.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Jeff Kleist Writer, Marketing, Licensing 2 years ago
The most important thing:

Know your property inside and out. Hire people who know it just as well. Create a product that COMPLIMENTS and EXPANDS that property. it's very rare that you can do an Angry Birds Star Wars. Alien Isolation, despite its warts is an Alien game through and through. Riddick, Ghostbusters (both the former Sierra console game and the new Oinball), X-wing and the Jedi Knights. Telltale's Back to the Future that goes ignored. Players who love a property will be forgiving of your boo-boos if you make them smile the majority of the time. Show them the love and they'll love you back. Alien fans and masochists love Isolation, and people truck through it because it's finally...finally an Alien game. And hey, don't forget South Park. That game turned out pretty damn well because it had the creator's hands firmly on the tiller
4Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (8)
Adam Campbell Game Production Manager, Azoomee2 years ago
I also thought there would be more about licensed games in AAA, as they have seen a real turn-around in terms of perception and reception. To be fair, not all licensed games through the decades have been terrible though, there were always some outstanding examples, even best sellers.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Paul Johnson Managing Director / Lead code monkey, Rubicon Development2 years ago
Licenses fit the mobile market better because that's where the audience volume is. I'm sure a Kim Kardashian game on Xbox would've sold about 10 copies.

AAA is (for the most part) about core gamers. The rest of the world looks to mobile for one reason or another. How big do you think the overlap is in a Venn diagram of core gamers vs Kardashian fans for example. We know how big it is for non-gamers, as she actually has a media "career".

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Paul Johnson on 5th November 2014 9:58am

3Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Klaus Preisinger Freelance Writing 2 years ago
I am sure the people who used to frown of licensed games in the past have no trouble frowning on this Kim Kardashian game. Even if there is no denying that the game is perfectly dialed in on its demographic. WWE Supercards anyone?
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Adam Campbell Game Production Manager, Azoomee2 years ago
Licenses fit the mobile market better because that's where the audience volume is
If those licenses are not 'core games' so to speak.

Edited 2 times. Last edit by Adam Campbell on 5th November 2014 4:36pm

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Neil Young Programmer, Rebellion Developments2 years ago
@Adam - makes sense. Mobile is a good fit for a lot of licences that wouldn't fly so well on consoles or "core" PC.

Also, for the sort of direct "tie in" game for an event such a film release, mobile's turnaround times are probably more appropriate - it's notable that a lot of the successful AAA licensed games of late have been notably detached from a direct film release or similar, suggesting the different types of licensed games are finding their appropriate platforms.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.