Close
Report Comment to a Moderator Our Moderators review all comments for abusive and offensive language, and ensure comments are from Verified Users only.
Please report a comment only if you feel it requires our urgent attention.
I understand, report it. Cancel

Gearbox Software's Rise to AAA Success

Gearbox Software's Rise to AAA Success

Tue 29 May 2012 1:48pm GMT / 9:48am EDT / 6:48am PDT
Development

Randy Pitchford on staying independent in console development and his excitement over billion-dollar budgets

This article won't be about Borderlands 2, though my inner gamer would very much like to talk about all those guns, and so would Randy Pitchford.

Gearbox Software's gregarious co-founder and CEO has heard every single one of the studio's projects heralded as a grand turning point, and while his excitement over its latest project is palpable, he regards it as just one more step on the way to bigger and better things. However, a casual observer might see things differently.

In the opening keynote of the Nordic Game Conference, Pitchford spoke in detail about Gearbox's 13-year journey to become one of the biggest AAA independent studios in the industry. The company's portfolio is both broad and deep, and its games tend to make money even when they give critics reason to grumble, and yet Borderlands 2 seems unprecedented.

Brothers In Arms was an original IP, but it mined an already tired World War II setting. When Borderlands sold 4.5 million units it was a genuine surprise, propelled by excellent reviews, ecstatic word-of-mouth and some of the best DLC yet released. With Borderlands 2, then, Gearbox arguably has its first true blockbuster; a game awaited with feverish anticipation even a full year before its release, one that would surprise few people if it sold 7 or 8 million units.

"In the cases where we've worked with licenses is we've really gone after things. We want to lead, and you can lead with licenses"

For Pitchford, the creative standards that Gearbox is achieving with Borderlands and its sequel is the culmination of progress made every day since he formed the company with Brian Martel, Stephen Bahl, Landon Montgomery and Rob Heironimus in January 1999. At that pointg, they successfully pitched the first expansion to Valve's seminal Half-Life, Opposing Force, and Pitchford was involved in practically every part of the game's development.

Today, Gearbox has almost 200 employees and Pitchford's role has changed dramatically, but to hear him tell it he doesn't miss the the focus and intimacy of those early days at all. As the company has grown it has raised its game in every area, replacing intimacy with mastery in each of the major disciplines of game production.

"There's actually multiple benefits from scale," he says. "Specialisation is the main one: the more people you have the more you can afford for individuals to become specialised in a very specific thread. It allows a potential for mastery, but it also creates a dependency on mastering everything else, because no one thing alone will result in a cohesive product."

Pitchford believes that Borderlands 2 is Gearbox's most coherent game yet, and that it will likely be its most financially successful is testament to how astute the company's leaders have been in navigating the increasingly treacherous waters of the AAA industry. Gearbox is a finely balanced organisation, with enough staff to deal with multiple projects in tandem, removing the need for knee-jerk redundancies as production on a game slows down. This is common practice in the games industry, but Pitchford believes it ultimately undermines the quality of the finished product.

1

"We've found that people have even more value on the next thing they're going to do, because the more we work together the more we understand each other's strengths and weaknesses, and leverage the strengths and mitigate the weaknesses," he says. "There's a real advantage to committed talent having time together on multiple projects over time. We don't like to do the churn. We have very little turnover."

But the freedom to grow in such a controlled way - adding only experienced people that the company needs and can sustain - didn't come from creating original IP. Brothers In Arms and Borderlands played their part, of course, but a key focus of Pitchford's talk was the importance of developing its skill with licenses. Even now, Gearbox is putting the finishing touches on Aliens: Colonial Marines as it polishes Borderlands 2, and the fact that it has a reputation in the industry for creative and professional work with established IP continues to be a bedrock of its business.

The difference, Pitchford claims, is that it has never treated licenses as inferior to its own creations. Developers that do so tend to simply ask publishers for work, take what they can get, and the result is often a poor product, devoid of passion. Gearbox, on the other hand, has devoted time and resources to selecting and pursuing specific licenses since its first day.

"What's different in the cases where we've worked with licenses is we've really gone after things," Pitchford says. "It's happened because we really wanted to be a part of that brand, or we felt we could really do something there that wouldn't have existed otherwise. That's a difference, especially with movie licenses. A lot of those are out day-and-date with the film, and the game is really ancillary; it just drafts off of the marketing for the movie. We don't want to draft; we want to lead, and you can lead with licenses.

"We're not even close to where it could be. Games suck, frankly. Compared to where they could be, all games suck"

"We're going to set ourselves towards making something, and we want to care about what it is we're going to make. It doesn't matter to us that it's built upon an existing universe and set of characters or something that we built from scratch; what matters to us is that we can be excited and passionate about it, and what we're trying to do is worthy of existence... From the very beginning we knew that. It's just part of our culture."

In the harsh conditions of contemporary AAA development a single miss can bring a studio to its knees. Gearbox is an independent company - a rarity in itself - and has no reason to let the world know every detail of its finances, but it's safe to assume that it has built the sort of success that even the failure of an important release like Borderlands 2 couldn't tear down.

Behind the scenes, Pitchford's team is working on several new projects. The days when five guys could make a Half-Life game are long gone, but the prospect of development costs rising still further only serves to widen Pitchford's grin. Of the myriad possible outcomes of the great Gearbox experiment, he finds himself on the brink of what could be his greatest success yet. The future holds nothing but excitement, and Pitchford clearly intends for Gearbox to play its part.

"You contemplate that the opportunity for complexity will expand with the technology, and we're not even close to where it could be," he says. "Games suck, frankly. Compared to where they could be, all games suck. It's going to be exciting to be part of a $100 million development team, or a $500 million, or a $1 billion dollar team.

"I'm excited about that. Can you imagine how awesome it's going to be when we can make a billion dollar game, and doing that's a great decision because that's where the market is. Think about how crazy these simulations are going to get. And then someday we'll be living in the Matrix, or the Holodeck, and I'm gonna be writing the software. We're not even close to what's possible. We're in the stone ages, man."

7 Comments

James Wells Gaming Contributor - digboston.com

72 32 0.4
Nice feature, it's cool to get Pitchford's perspective on company growth. Borderlands 2 looks like it'll be a riot to play.
It's true the WW2 shooter had been beaten to death by the time they got around to releasing Brothers in Arms, but they were successful in crafting an engrossing game with authentic locations and fantastically-developed, memorable characters. Now if only Gearbox would give us a proper conclusion to the franchise...

Edited 1 times. Last edit by James Wells on 29th May 2012 4:18pm

Posted:2 years ago

#1

William Brown Aspiring Level Designer

20 0 0.0
Maybe I'm taking this to an extreme but a $1bn game would be expected to retail at $600 a game to recoup costs on the basis that said billion dollar game achieved similar 4 million+ sales (based in current tech and market). Good luck to gearbox if and when development costs are this high, unfortunately i expect that in years to come I read that gearbox went out of business after a billion dollar title flops (fwiw I'm a big fan of gearbox games).

Side note: maybe Randy is hedging his bet on hyper inflation kicking in someday, then he'll have his billion dollar title.

Posted:2 years ago

#2

Paul Gheran Scrum Master

123 27 0.2
Gearbox... Gearbox, oh yeah now I remember, these dudes are the porting house that ruined Counter Strike, yeah?

Posted:2 years ago

#3

Tim Carter Designer - Writer - Producer

578 322 0.6
It is pure cognitive dissonance to believe that you will have the same passion for an outsider's project as you will for your own.

This said, it is also cognitive dissonance to believe that your own project will be better than any from the outside simply because it's yours. (That's prima-donna thinking. Game studios often fall into this when they obstinantly refuse to consider a game design from an outsider, unless they're being paid.)

So this creates a paradox. How do you make a masterpiece if the source of this masterpiece may be an outside vision?

The answer is not in technology or platforms or whatever. The answer lies in writing and communication, and searching for talent, and properly crediting and compensating that talent.

In other words: the art patronage system. The film model. The music and architecture and visual arts models. Anything else is not a system to make real art.

So if all games are garbage, that's why. They apply a software engineering business model to an art/entertainment field.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Tim Carter on 29th May 2012 8:07pm

Posted:2 years ago

#4

Craig Page Programmer

384 220 0.6
How was Borderlands success a surprise? That game was like playing through a comic book or graphic novel, and it had four player co-op. So instead of just 1.15 million people buying it, 4.6 million people did.

Posted:2 years ago

#5

William Brown Aspiring Level Designer

20 0 0.0
I'll put my hands up and say I didn't actually buy Borderlands I was fortunate that a mate got the game as part of a bundle replacing a 360 that (typically) died, he didn't show an interest in it in so much that he didn't even remove the packaging so I borrowed it. Although I'm sure he still contributed towards one of the 4.6M copies sold none the less (and he still hasn't played it).

Posted:2 years ago

#6

Andrew Goodchild Studying development, Train2Game

1,254 421 0.3
It shows how far Gearbox have come in just over a decade, they ported the Halo to PC back then I believe, now they are one of 3 developers mentioned in the Bungie/Activision contract, alongside Epic and Valve that are considered to big of competitors to be involved with porting the new franchise. I'm sure others would also be turned down, but not specifically singled out. I can't really see a situation now where any of the three, but especially Valve would be doing that sort of work for higher on porting someone else's game to another platform for Activision, but nice to get a mention I reckon.

Posted:2 years ago

#7

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now