Close
Report Comment to a Moderator Our Moderators review all comments for abusive and offensive language, and ensure comments are from Verified Users only.
Please report a comment only if you feel it requires our urgent attention.
I understand, report it. Cancel

Activision under fire: stock hits its lowest point in a year

Activision under fire: stock hits its lowest point in a year

Wed 14 Nov 2012 5:16pm GMT / 12:16pm EST / 9:16am PST
BusinessPublishingFinancial

Activision investors have become bearish. Analysts discuss the publisher's prospects

Activision Blizzard

Headquartered in Santa Monica, California, Activision Blizzard, Inc. is a worldwide pure-play online...

activisionblizzard.c...

Activision stock is now trading at about $10.75, about 15 percent down from its peak earlier this year. The stock dropped after Activision's earnings report, where the company beat estimates and raised its forecast for the year to a record level, but warned that 2013 results would not be as good. Logically, better earnings should mean the stock price would rise, but investors seem to be bearish on Activision's long-term prospects.

Investors seem to have taken CEO Bobby Kotick's warning about 2013 to heart. They may be focusing on what Activision didn't say: Whether World of Warcraft subscriptions would hold their level well into next year, or whether new IP from Bungie would have an impact on 2013 results. It may also be a reflection of general uncertainty about the as-yet unannounced next-gen consoles from Sony and Microsoft, when they might arrive and how well they might be received. What does this all say about Activision's potential for 2014 and beyond?

"Activision still provides a level of visibility that is unmatched by competitors, and the stock should trade at a premium valuation"

Colin Sebastian, RW Baird

“I believe that many investors look at the video game sector through a fairly narrow lens,” said Colin Sebastian, analyst with RW Baird. “Since it's a hit driven business, the question more often than not is what's coming next, rather than how is business performing today. In Activision's case, they raised guidance upward, assuming that Call of Duty and Skylanders would sell at least reasonably well.”

Sebastian feels the important issue is what Activision has in the pipeline for next year. “Management was somewhat cautious given the strong performance of Diablo III this year and risks from the console transition,” Sebastian notes. “In this market, investors are unlikely to take anything for granted, and the next-gen consoles are still a year away. In our view, Activision still provides a level of visibility that is unmatched by competitors, and the stock should trade at a premium valuation.”

John Taylor of Arcadia Investment Corp. sees Activison being properly careful about predictions for next year. “While optimistic, the company is prudently cautious in predicting growth for its largest blockbuster properties, which are already best of breed and dominant market share leaders. Indeed, even though presales for Call of Duty: Black Ops II exceed the level of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 last year, the current financial plan assumes a modest decline in revenue for the brand this year. Meanwhile, Skylanders is running well ahead of last year, and will likely be a big hit this holiday. Sustaining the volume from these mega brands during the platform transition next year will be a key challenge for management.”

Billy Pidgeon, senior market analyst at Inside Network, thinks that the issue for investors isn't Activision's results per se. “I think it's the sector revenue that's in question for the most part. In the short term, industry sales appear to be contracting. However, revenue growth is not completely transparent, and I believe there will be strong revenue growth in the industry overall beyond the next two years.”

"Activision Blizzard's primary liability could be World of Warcraft, which appears to be past its peak and could see declining subscriptions"

Billy Pidgeon, Inside Social Network

Pidgeon believes big changes in the game industry are keeping investors cautious. “There are major disruptions that are affecting the sector overall, including an under-reported shift from packaged software to paid digital downloads in the hardcore games category and changes in consumption where gamers are developing more specialized tastes, buying fewer new packaged games and playing those games for longer periods of time, mostly in multiplayer sessions. The casual and free-to-play games category has also seen high volatility, although much of the perceived under-performance in that category is likely due to unrealistically high short term expectations.”

There's a good reason to be positive about Activision's outlook, according to Pidgeon. “Activision Blizzard has been a consistent over-achiever in the traditional console market, and has historically been less susceptible to console cycles,” Pidgeon noted. “Activision Blizzard has long been consistent in deftly managing sales expectations and the publisher's franchises and overall sales revenues, more often than not, out-perform those expectations on a quarterly and annual basis. Activision Blizzard's release pipeline tends to be well rounded but lean, with a high hits to misses ratio.”

Pidgeon sees some problem areas for Activision, though. “Activision Blizzard's primary liability could be World of Warcraft, which appears to be past its peak and could see declining subscriptions. However, it's hard to fault Activision Blizzard for WoW's eventual decline, as the game has had an unprecedented eight-year run dominating the subscription-based massively multiplayer online games category, where most competing publishers have consistently failed to enter, let alone survive.”

"Investors are exceedingly pessimistic about the next generation; most believe costs are going up and revenues won't go up as much, so they are staying away from all of the 'quality' names (EA, Ubisoft, TTWO)"

Michael Pachter, Wedbush Securities

Pidgeon is optimistic for the game industry's outlook. “With the industry in transition, big publishers like Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Ubisoft might appear to have more at risk, but they also have more diverse libraries and broader platform coverage, while smaller publishers will be seeking and creating highly specialized niches.”

Michael Pachter of Wedbush Securities points the finger at Activision's warning about 2013 as the driver behind the stock drop. “Stocks are valued based upon the sum of their expected future earnings, discounted back to the present,” Pacheter explained. “The past only matters to suggest what future earnings can be, and Activision suggested that its future earnings would be lower. They didn't really explain much about why, other than that Blizzard will be down, but the implication may have been that WoW is getting long in the tooth and CoD is approaching a peak. In any case, their gloomy forecast is what sent the stock lower.”

“I think people are unsure about WoW,” Pacheter continued. “The subscription revenue figure wasn't very robust, suggesting that western subs have continued to decline and are being replaced by lower revenue Asian subs. People want to see a sign that revenues from WoW are growing, and it isn't clear that they will grow again.”

Will next-generation consoles and the prospect of a new Bungie hit help the stock price? Pachter doesn't think so. “Investors are exceedingly pessimistic about the next generation; most believe costs are going up and revenues won't go up as much, so they are staying away from all of the 'quality' names (EA, Ubisoft, TTWO). All of these companies are trading at record low multiples.”

The future beyond 2013 is murky. “I don't think anyone really knows about the potential for 2014 and beyond. Activision has proven resourceful, building CoD into a massive franchise, seeing the potential of Guitar Hero, shrugging off the music fad and coming up with Skylanders, and giving Blizzard free rein to come up with whatever they like. I think they're going to be fine, but investors need to see evidence of management confidence, and management sent a pessimistic signal on the earnings call.”

GamesIndustry International reached out to Activision for comment, but as yet there has been no response.

10 Comments

Bruce Everiss Marketing Consultant

1,692 594 0.4
Understandable and in line with Bobby Kotick's pessimism.
There is a strong possibility that a high proportion of their income is stranded on burning platforms and as yet (unlike EA) they do not have a sufficient insurance policy to cover what could well be the future dominant platforms.

Posted:2 years ago

#1

Peter Dwyer Games Designer/Developer

482 293 0.6
@Tom

Do you invest money in companies at all? If so you will know that your return is based on company profits. If a company isn't going to make you any money then you sell, cut your losses and move on to one that will. Earnings up but, profits down is what we are hearing a lot of these days and that directly translates to less in your shareholder pocket. So a company can be earning Billions in revenue but, if only 3 million of that is actual profit then it ain't actually worth as much as you think!

Posted:2 years ago

#2
I understand your point Tom.
I know from experience that share prices seem to be 10% valuation, 90% speculation. This is especially true of an industry like ours.

That's the way the market works though...

Posted:2 years ago

#3

Nick Parker Consultant

306 186 0.6
If you study Activision share price over the past two years, it doesn't move much from a $11 to $13 range so at $10.75 (currently $10.51), there is room for it to return to its two year band shortly which I'm sure it will. All shares have fallen since the election result so the recent Activision decline has some of that reaction within the graph.

Posted:2 years ago

#4

Steve Peterson West Coast Editor, GamesIndustry.biz

111 73 0.7
Interestingly, ATVI continues to fall; it's now at $10.54, a new low for the last 12 months. Meanwhile, GameStop announces a huge loss, and their stock is up almost 3%. Go figure.

Posted:2 years ago

#5
The market always speculates, that is, most news is already "priced in".
In the case of Activision, the market is speculating that 2013 will not be good for them, so regardless of how well their current results are, the market thinks that they will do worse in the future, hence the loss in value. This was as a result of guidance direct from Activision in their earnings call.
As for BP and the spike after the news of the massive fine, the market was already braced for this, and I can only assume that it had anticipated a higher fine than the one that they got, resulting in a price surge.
It happens all the time. Try investing your own money in some companies and you'll see just how irrational, speculative and downright bonkers the world of equity investment can be sometimes. Or, alternatively, don't :-)

Posted:2 years ago

#6

Craig Page Programmer

390 233 0.6
So... I should buy Activision, sell GameStop, and hold onto my BP shares? :)

Posted:2 years ago

#7

Michael Vandendriessche Studying Computer Science, K.U. Leuven

85 12 0.1
I believe that Bungie title will replace WoW as one of the three pillars Activision spoke of before the release of skylanders.
I'm curious to see which of the other 2 pillars will go first, cod or skylanders. (assuming they won't be speaking of 4 or 5 pillars in the next years)

Posted:2 years ago

#8

Benjamin Kratsch Deputy Editor-in-Chief, Games Network

22 4 0.2
I don`t see this coming.
You can bet on 15-20 mio. sales on Call of Duty every year. That`s safe plus DLC
And you shouldn`t forget that WoW is a bit like the iPhone for apple. It cost`s next to nothing (sure they have server costs and admins in france and all over the world and do patches) but there is still 9 mio. people paying 12 dollar a month. That said WoW is doing a billion dollar each year without any big investment from Activision. And they still have their yearly addons. My guess is that they earn more money with WoW than some smaller publishers the whole year.

I think Activision will skip mid budget productions like Prototype 2 and focus on CoD, Skylanders and the Bungie series. And I mean they have money like hell. If Activision is smart they are already developing an inhouse engine which is ready to compete with Frostbite Engine 2. And if they are smarter they are buying the Cryengine 3. If Black Ops 2 would look like Crysis 3, they could probably sell way more copies because the graphics are the only complaints this year.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Benjamin Kratsch on 19th November 2012 1:42am

Posted:2 years ago

#9

Benjamin Kratsch Deputy Editor-in-Chief, Games Network

22 4 0.2
Do you think that the new Bungie Game will be the next big thing for Activision? I kind of doubt that. They are a good studio, but without Halo I think it will be tough to build a billion dollar game. Activision is no "you are selling 5 mio. copies, that`s cool"-Publisher. Either you go big or you go home.

Posted:2 years ago

#10

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now