Close
Report Comment to a Moderator Our Moderators review all comments for abusive and offensive language, and ensure comments are from Verified Users only.
Please report a comment only if you feel it requires our urgent attention.
I understand, report it. Cancel

Take Two shares rise as Acti buyout rumours swirl

Take Two shares rise as Acti buyout rumours swirl

Mon 01 Sep 2014 7:53am GMT / 3:53am EDT / 12:53am PDT
RumourFinancial

Analyst believes Hollywood beckons for gaming's biggest brands

Activision Blizzard

Headquartered in Santa Monica, California, Activision Blizzard, Inc. is a worldwide pure-play online...

activisionblizzard.c...

Take-Two's share price rose nearly five per cent to 23.66 on Friday as rumours circulated that the publisher may be the target of a potential takeover by Activision.

Mike Hickey, an equity researcher for the Benchmark Company, penned a note which fuelled the trading, claiming that the two companies were engaged on an "emerging romance".

"For Activision, acquiring Take-Two Interactive would be a no-brainer, in our view, circling some of the strongest development talent and owned IP in the world, within a company that has nearly $1 billion in cash and trades at a comparably lower multiple," Hickey's report reads. "With the acquisition of Take-Two Interactive, Activision would have arguably the three strongest development studios in the world with Rockstar Games, Bungie and Blizzard."

By acquiring Take Two's portfolio, Hickey believes that Activision could offer a rolling catalogue of massively high-profile AAA console titles, capitalising massively on the tremendous performance of the current generation of new machines.

"The opportunity for Activision to intelligently layer future releases from Rockstar, Bungie and Blizzard, could in-part enable Activision to annualize future performance from what today is arguably a less linear performance profile"

Mike Hickey, Equity Researcher, The Benchmark Company LLC

"While Activision has historically managed their performance profile around franchises they can annualize, their $500 million investment in Bungie seems to be a departure from that philosophy, as we suspect the venture will prove difficult to annualize. The opportunity for Activision to intelligently layer future releases from Rockstar, Bungie and Blizzard, could in-part enable Activision to annualize future performance from what today is arguably a less linear performance profile.

"We would also note that Activision's mega performance foundation with World of Warcraft is trapped within a life cycle decline, their Skylanders franchise will face considerable pressure from Disney and Call of Duty is vulnerable to franchise fatigue from consistent annual iterations. Therefore, acquiring GTA, Red Dead, Borderlands, NBA 2K, BioShock... etc. Along with the potential performance opportunity from a new MMO and movie adoption of GTA from Rockstar Games... Acquiring Take-Two Interactive would seem like a very smart move for Activision."

Hickey doesn't see the potential deal being motivated entirely by a desire for direct growth, however. He points to shared cinematic ambitions as the key factor in any merger. Activision has close ties to Hollywood, and its attention, as evinced by the recruitment of superstar Kevin Spacey for the latest Call of Duty title. Take Two is rumoured, not for the first time, to be shopping around for a potential film adaptation of Grand Theft Auto, something which Activision's capital and connections could make a great deal easier.

"Activision's MO is relatively anti-risk and it has a calculated long-term growth strategy based on establishing and developing billion dollar franchises that unlock large amounts of value for the company"

Piers Harding-Rolls, Director, Head of Games, IHS

"We suspect that Activision's strategic alignment into the movie business, could in-part be related to an emerging romance wrinkle between the two companies and the Houser's, leading toward a possible Take-Two acquisition," Hickey continues.

Some other analysts are more cautious, however. Piers Harding-Rolls, head of games at major analyst IHS, doesn't necessarily see the move making sense for the larger company.

"I would file this rumour under unlikely at this point," he told GamesIndustry.biz in an exclusive statement. "Activision's MO is relatively anti-risk and it has a calculated long-term growth strategy based on establishing and developing billion dollar franchises that unlock large amounts of value for the company. Activision is well placed to deliver that once again following the Skylanders success with Destiny and I don't believe acquiring Take Two and its stable of IP fits with this strategy.

"Having said that, Activision is likely to be looking for further growth opportunities - it has yet to build a substantial games apps business and a number of its franchises are longer in the tooth or more competitively challenged than before. As such, I think we can expect Activision to be more rigorously examining adjacent markets - the movie opportunity makes sense in this context - as well as planning for the development of new franchises within its portfolio."

True or not, the note was enough to light a fire under the imaginations of traders. Take Two's stock actually reached a six year high on July 28, at 23.67, but dropped soon after. Friday's news pushed it up 4.67 per cent, with Activision's stock also rising 0.81 per cent to 23.54.

Were Kotick and Hirshberg to take the plunge, they'd have to put a more convincing offer on the table than EA managed in 2008, the last time a public offer was made for Take Two. Then, a deal worth $2 billion wasn't enough to convince Take Two shareholders, who felt that the company was being undervalued, rejecting the offer.

9 Comments

Kevin Clark-Patterson Lecturer in Games Development, Lancaster and Morecambe College

294 27 0.1
From a business POV it makes perfect sense. However I can almost hear Rockstar fans screaming...Steven Ogg (Trevor Philips)'s "GO FUCK YOURSELF!"

Posted:A month ago

#1

Patrick Frost QA Project Monitor

400 196 0.5
I wouldn't claim to know Rockstar or many of the other Take2 studios well but I've always thought of them as having a certain level of art-house philosophy to their work. "It gets released when it's ready" does not seem to be an ideal that will happily sit with Activision.

Posted:A month ago

#2
I doubt T2 want to be acquisition....

Posted:A month ago

#3

Neil Young Programmer, Rebellion Developments

302 383 1.3
"It gets released when it's ready" does not seem to be an ideal that will happily sit with Activision.
Depends - Blizzard seems to work along those lines.

Posted:A month ago

#4

Christopher Bowen Editor in Chief, Gaming Bus

448 695 1.6
"I doubt T2 want to be (acquired)"

The problem is that they're public, and might not have a choice in the matter. See: their prior issues with Carl Ichann.

Posted:A month ago

#5

Richard Browne EVP Gaming and Interactive, Evergreen Studios

103 117 1.1
I don't think the Houser's would have any problem accepting a few hundred million if they were left alone as always ; the movie piece makes no sense whatsoever however, if they want a GTA movie done they'd have zero difficulty sitting down at any Studio in Hollywood just by picking up the phone - indeed probably already have. Whether any studio would gamble on giving them carte Blanche over it though is an entirely different matter ; which is probably why it hasn't happened to date.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Richard Browne on 1st September 2014 6:15pm

Posted:A month ago

#6

Paul Jace Merchandiser

935 1,410 1.5
While I think it would be a good catch for Activision I wonder if this isn't because they're worried that Destiny won't be as big a hit as they think it will be. It should(I don't think it will get much competition when it launches in September) but I suppose the issue there is that it will not be released annually like COD so they will have to find other ways to monetize it. So having a larger, stronger stable of franchises would help alleviate not being able to release one of their biggest(Destiny) every year.

Posted:A month ago

#7

Nick Wofford Hobbyist

180 190 1.1
If T2 wasn't going to take $2B, then I doubt there's a number that would work for them. Sure, they're public, but this deal doesn't really help T2 at all. Maybe market security, and certainly more capital, but they're doing fantastic. They don't need this right now.

Posted:A month ago

#8

Posted:A month ago

#9

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now