If you click on a link and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. Read our editorial policy.

Zampella and West could veto Modern Warfare releases

Duo could seek injunction prohibiting work on MW series, claims legal expert

Sacked Activision duo Jason West and Vince Zampella could veto the planned release of downloadable content or future releases in the Modern Warfare series, if the legal issues with former employer Activision are ruled in their favour.

That's according to Jas Purewal, English lawyer and litigation specialist, who said that the duo's claim of creative control over the Modern Warfare brand could have very serious consequences for the future of Activision's war franchise.

"This is potentially explosive," wrote Purewal on his personal blog Gamerlaw. "West and Zampella are arguing they have contractual creative control over the Modern Warfare brand.  The details will have to come out in the litigation, but it could see West and Zampella demanding a veto over Modern Warfare 2 DLC as well as any other Modern Warfare games."

He continued: "It will be interesting to see how aggressively West and Zampella pursue this claim: if they have a good legal basis for their argument, you could even see them seeking an injunction against Activision prohibiting any further work on Modern Warfare until this lawsuit is resolved.  That would be a difficult argument to run but, whether successful or not, it wouldn't go down very well with Activision."

Activision is claiming it sacked West and Zampella due to breach of contract and insubordination, but Purewal – as well as noting that 'insubordination' has no legal meaning in the UK or US – suggests that even if this is the case, the pair could still claim the bonuses owed to them following the sales success of Modern Warfare 2.

"West and Zampella may have an alternative legal argument, i.e. that even if Activision is right regarding their 'breaches of contract and insubordination' it was still legally unfair for Activision to fire them just before their royalty payments were due to be paid.  If that argument has legal force under Californian law, and is accepted by the Californian court, then in principle West and Zampella could seek to claim their royalty payments even though Activision may have been right to fire them."

Unless Activision deals with the legal issue quickly, it's likely to lead to a messy court battle which could disclose sensitive issues such as employment arrangements at Activision, remuneration, commercial and personal relationships between the developers, their employer and the Infinity Ward business, said Purewal.

"The short-term prognosis at this very early stage does not look good," he continued. "Activision faces a high-profile, high-value lawsuit from hostile plaintiffs which is likely to stay in the spotlight for some time.

"Worse, unless it can get rid of the lawsuit quickly, Activision faces lingering legal doubt as to whether West and Zampella retain creative control over Modern Warfare.  And, worst of all, this will mean the industry watching very carefully what it does next and how it relates with developers in the future."

Author

Matt Martin avatar

Matt Martin

Contributor

Matt Martin joined GamesIndustry in 2006 and was made editor of the site in 2008. With over ten years experience in journalism, he has written for multiple trade, consumer, contract and business-to-business publications in the games, retail and technology sectors.

Comments

More News

Latest Articles