Price Warfare

Activision's move to 55 is bold, risky and unpopular - but it will probably work.

Activision's decision to price Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 at GBP 10 above the normal SRP for console games in the UK is still being digested by the games market and gamers alike. The company protests that the decision is purely based on economic factors - the weakness of the pound on the currency markets and the rising costs of development. Just about everyone else, however, is calling a spade a spade - this is a cheeky testing of the water, to see whether the market will support higher SRPs for major releases.

On the face of it, it's a downright awful time to test this premise. The full effects of the recession are starting to be felt in the UK, with rising unemployment and many workers facing pay freezes or reduced shifts. After years of inflation, the City now frets about the possibility of deflation - which would leave more expensive videogames looking even more out of place.

However, it's already fairly clear that "core" games such as Modern Warfare 2 don't suffer significantly from economic downturn, as their audience views them as a high-priority purchase - and will sacrifice other purchases in order to afford them. Perhaps, in light of that, now is as good a time as any other to experiment with premium price points.

Besides, Activision already has significant experience of success with premium prices, thanks to Guitar Hero. Those games may justify their expensive price tags by putting plastic instruments in the box, but the reality for the consumer remains the same - they end up spending significantly more for their gaming experience than they normally would, and the success of Guitar Hero and Rock Band suggests that they're happy to do so.

Some would argue that the inclusion of peripherals affects the perception of value which informs the consumer's purchasing decision, and there's a lot of weight to that argument. It's incredibly facile, but at the end of the day, Guitar Hero comes in a big box - Modern Warfare 2, on the other hand, will be in a box the same size as any other, but with a bigger price tag. That, critics anticipate, will make the price hike a lot harder to swallow.

There's undoubtedly some truth to that, but consumer perception of value doesn't entirely come from the size of your box or how many plastic peripherals it holds. Modern Warfare 2 comes to the market with an advantage which practically no other videogame can boast - a track record of extraordinary value. For millions of the consumers who bought the first Modern Warfare game, it counts among the best value purchases they've ever made.

The reason for that, obviously enough, is the multi-player. Along with a limited number of other game franchises - Half-Life, Halo and Quake, primarily - Modern Warfare has managed to deliver hundreds, even thousands of hours of entertainment to many of its purchasers. With 12 to 16 hours now considered to be a very solid length for a game experience, and less than 10 hours becoming increasingly common, the kind of consumers who enjoy multi-player will have found Modern Warfare to be one of the cheapest games they've ever bought, on a per-hour basis.

That's a slightly abstract calculation, perhaps, but it's one that will influence consumer spending. Anecdotally, I know that most of my gamer friends will buy Modern Warfare 2 at the higher price point, simply because they fully expect to get hundreds of hours of multi-player from the title. It's exactly the same calculation which justified spending hundreds of pounds on Rock Band or Guitar Hero instruments, games and song packs - it's not the flimsy plastic instruments which justify the outlay, it's the countless hours of beer-fuelled, sociable fun.

The flaw in all of this, of course, is that not everyone plays multi-player. For many people, Modern Warfare was an entertaining, well-made and enjoyable single-player FPS game - not exactly the pinnacle of the genre, but great nonetheless. It was also a game that was over in about ten hours. At GBP 3.50 per hour, that was a decent investment, competitive with cinema or DVD. At GBP 4.50 or GBP 5, it starts to look less appealing - especially in the busy Christmas market, with many other big titles clamouring for attention and costing GBP 10 less.

But of course, the reality is that the game won't stay at that price point forever. The first Modern Warfare game held its value for much longer than most games do, but even taking that into account, within a few months that extra tenner will have been shaved off by retailer discounting. Is this, perhaps, what Activision expects? The multi-player users, the hardcore who are incredibly excited about buying Modern Warfare 2, will buy the game at its inflated price point in the first few weeks - and the single-player cohort, less enthused about the game's value proposition, will pile in when the price drops and give the game great long-tail sales?

Activision must be well-aware of the risks inherent in this strategy. Some multi-player players will also hold out until the price falls - if that's a big enough percentage, it'll hammer Modern Warfare 2's early sell-through numbers, forcing a price drop much earlier than planned. Consumers with limited budgets may not hold on to their pennies until the price drops, instead buying rival products and simply never coming back to buy Modern Warfare 2. The possibility of a conscious backlash to what's seen as straightforward price gouging also needs to be considered.

In a time when the traditional boxed game model is under increasing price pressure from subscription and 'freemium' models, it's certainly a bold move for Activision to experiment with driving prices up, rather than down - and if there was ever a game for which it's likely to work, it's Modern Warfare 2.

However, the other publishers who will undoubtedly be watching the game's success carefully would do well to remember that this strategy is highly dependent on the nature of the game itself. Publishers have long been fond of slapping the triple-A label arbitrarily on their high-budget, core market productions - to suddenly decide that the success of MW2 (and I do believe that it will be a success) at a higher price point justifies slapping bigger price tags on everything they consider AAA would be to court disaster. The market will probably tolerate a premium being charged for the occasional extraordinarily anticipated, high-value title. Any greedy attempt to make this move more widespread, however, could damage sales more than any recession ever could.

Related stories

Call of Duty: Mobile will launch outside of China

Activision and Tencent unveil free-to-play title, confirm launch in North America, South America and Europe

By Matthew Handrahan

Team spaces in Call of Duty esports league reportedly cost $25m each

Preparations begin for franchised, city-based competition around Activision's flagship shooter

By James Batchelor

Latest comments (8)

Chris Hunter-Brown IT / Games specialist, BBFC9 years ago
I would venture the majority of "core" early adopters won't be paying SRP for it anyway as they'll seek out the cheapest online deals. Of course, Activision will be benefiting from the increased trade price regardless.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Tameem Antoniades Creative Director & Co-founder, Ninja Theory Ltd9 years ago
I remember buying Donkey Kong Country on the snes for 70 (or was is 90?). It still sold 6m copies in 6 weeks.

Although, I would have preferred if they'd released a single player disc at normal RRP and then have the option to download/unlock the mp at extra cost.

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Jonathan McEnroe Freelance 2D artist 9 years ago
Quite a lot of the original N64 games were really expensive, I couldn't believe the prices at the time. Modern Warfare 2 will still sell around the estimated number of copies regardless of the price.

A lot of people loved Modern Warfare 1, so it'll still do well, especially if the multiplayer is even better than the first.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (8)
Matt Lowe Associate Producer, Splash Damage9 years ago
Regardless of if the game sells at that price or not this damages the relationship the fans have with Activision and Infinity Ward. Who knows, that might come back to haunt them in future.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
robert troughton Managing Director, Coconut Lizard9 years ago
I would've thought that a better business model than this would be to charge people for additional content... release the game at the usual price but, immediately, make available a "map pack" with extra levels at 10. Where people would balk at the 55 price tag (not sure what that equates to in proper retail terms - 45 in Game?), they would probably be ok with a smaller price - and they'd probably buy the map pack a day or two after buying the game as well.

My son is absolutely mad about Call of Duty... given the chance he'd sell our house to buy the latest version I reckon...
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Chris Kolmatycki Game Designer, HB Studios9 years ago
"My son is absolutely mad about Call of Duty... given the chance he'd sell our house to buy the latest version I reckon... "

I think there are a lot of people like this. Why not charge what the market will bear for the game?
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Nick Ferguson Sr. Business Development Manager, Amazon9 years ago
I spent over 40 going to see National Treasure 2 at the cinema with my wife.

Call of Duty sounds like a bargain.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Alan Dixon Recruitment Consultant, Amiqus9 years ago
To be honest, I am considering buying the HMV special edition for 110!! Although that does come with some 'night vision goggles' it is still quite alot for a game... then again...
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.