Get your job in front of the right talentSearch our CV libraryUtilise the global reach of

Moore - Publishers must find solution to pre-owned

EA Sports president believes that second-hand market is retail's "prerogative"

Peter Moore, president of EA Sports, has acknowledged that while the pre-owned videogame market is a challenge for publishers, the onus is on publishers to find a way to monetise the second-sale consumer.

Speaking to he also stated his belief that the sale of second-hand games - a practice which key specialist retailers in the West, including GAME and GameStop, rely upon - is "their perfect right," echoing comments made earlier this year by SEGA Europe boss Mike Hayes.

"It's their prerogative to do that," said Moore on the pre-owned market. "What we have to do as publishers is find ways of taking advantage of that.

"How do we monetise that second-sale consumer? I think online is the key to that, and finding ways of innovating with that consumer, because they still log-on, and we get access to them, so how do we sell them stuff?

"You like to think you make compulsive game experiences and people won't want to trade them in, but that's their perfect right.

"Again, our point as publisher would be that the business exists, it's a multi-billion dollar business - our job would be to figure out how we treat them as any other customer, how we monetise that consumer."

The first part of the interview with Peter Moore, in which he also talks about the next FIFA title and discusses the challenges of franchise iterations, is available now.

 Get your job in front of the right talentSearch our CV libraryUtilise the global reach of

More stories

EA changes executive compensation scheme, cuts execs' 2021 pay

CEO Andrew Wilson still set to earn $39.2 million, was awarded $48 million since May 2020 as retention incentive

By James Batchelor

Hackers steal EA source code for FIFA 21, Frostbite

Publisher says no player data was accessed, does not expect attack to impact games or business

By Brendan Sinclair

Latest comments (5)

Fran Mulhern , Recruit3D12 years ago
A cheaper version of a game with, say, the first few levels. After that, DLC. Having said that, titles that are - ahem - "less than engaging" will tank even more than before.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Fran Mulhern , Recruit3D12 years ago
Actually, it's pretty easy to find Halo or GoW on the shelves. It's not with COD4, but I personally think that's a conscious decision by the retailers to deny people the opportunity to buy it "on the cheap" when they can still get full price for it. But that's the cynic in me;) I'm sure there MUST be people who have traded COD4 in.

And yeah, it's a fair point about people not having access to the net. But it doesn't mean the principle isn't sound. Maybe one option is to have a downloadable version, which is cheaper, and a regular "all in the box" version which is a bit more pricey - to reflect that it may be sold on. That would take up more shelf space though, and presumably some retailers would be reluctant to sell the cheaper version - but it's still an idea. I guess like Moore said, retailers can do what they want - it's up to the industry to find a solution.

The other problem is that - being completely honest - not all games can be brilliant, or even just "very good". I think you and I have had this conversation on here before actually, so I'm not expecting you to agree with me:) With a market so saturated, there's going to be awesome stuff and not so good stuff mixed in, with the majority being "so so". So I don't think it works to say that developers should simply improve their products so that people won't trade them in. That's a simplistic approach that just won't work - just as all football clubs won't one day be brilliant, so all games won't one day all be as good as each other.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Jim Webb Executive Editor/Community Director, E-mpire Ltd. Co.12 years ago
You can't monetize it directly.

It might be the retailers right to resell the product but it's also the publishers right to charge the retailer more for titles that are expected to have a high resell rate as a means to offset anticipated revenue loss.

The retailer might try to pass on the higher costs to the consumer but the consumer may take their business elsewhere to save money so they may also be reluctant to carry over the price increase.

If retailers are going to double dip your product, sell at a higher rate to offset.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (5)
Joćo Namorado Project Manager, Portugal Telecom12 years ago
Jimmy, you seem to basically say that games wich are not that good should be sold at a higher price. People trade in games faster and/or more often that are either too short or not that good. And those games probably should be sold at a lower price from the start.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Jim Webb Executive Editor/Community Director, E-mpire Ltd. Co.12 years ago
Most low budget titles are already sold below the standard $50 for Wii / $60 for PS360 rates meaning they are sold to retailers at a lower rate as well.

But then there are plenty of good games that are high budget/effort that are simply short with little incentive to put the disc back into the system once completed.

Market rate, budget, anticipated returns, resale rate, etc....all that should be factored. High budget plus high resale rate = higher market rate. Low budget plus high anticipated returns = lower market rate. Adjust that market rate based on expected resale rates. If you sell to retail a flat rate regardless of the game, that's your own damn fault.

You want one more way to reduce the volume of resale? Reduce the volume of products launched to begin with. GameStop intentionally uses a small store footprint with limited shelf space so that games are quickly cycled through that limited shelf space and consumers that don't buy right away are almost forced into buying a used copy. If that shelf space wasn't cycled through so fast consumers could buy a new copy much longer after launch. Another benefit to fewer overall titles is higher quality products - with potentially more replay value - which would further reduce the number of copies returned and up for resale.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.