Sections

 Get your job in front of the right talentSearch our CV libraryUtilise the global reach of Gamesindustry.biz

Court upholds jury's decision in Steam Controller patent dispute

Judge denies Valve's request to throw out jury's $4 million verdict, as well as Scuf Gaming's attempt to increase penalty

Valve's attempt to overturn a jury's $4 million decision against it in a patent suit has failed, as reported by The Esports Observer.

US District Court Judge Thomas S. Zilly last week denied Valve's motion to overturn the jury decision as well as its request for a new trial, but also denied the request of plaintiff Ironburg Inventions (parent company of Scuf Gaming) to increase the damages Valve must pay.

The dispute concerns a patent held by Ironburg for a game controller with two additional paddle buttons on the rear of the controller designed for a user's middle fingers.

A key point of contention in the case was whether or not Valve's Steam Controller -- which has a back battery cover with wings on either side that act as paddle buttons -- would count as having the two elongated paddles described in the original patent.

In the ruling, Zilly referred back to the opening statements of Valve's counsel, with the attorney arguing it was a straight-forward case that could be determined with just two pieces of evidence: the patent itself and Valve's Steam Controller.

"The Court agrees that this case is straightforward and can be decided on the '525 Patent and the accused device," Zilly wrote. "The jury appears to have done exactly that, but defendant does not like the result the jury reached. Defendant's dissatisfaction does not constitute grounds for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial."

 Get your job in front of the right talentSearch our CV libraryUtilise the global reach of Gamesindustry.biz

More stories

Catching up with the ESA on the eve of the first digital E3

Trade group's president Stanley Pierre-Louis answers our questions about cryptocurrency, gambling, social justice, and toxic fandoms

By Brendan Sinclair

Will the new world of the metaverse be governed by old rules?

Gregor Pryor looks at the legal implications of the latest trend and the need for publishers to form IP protection policies now

By Gregor Pryor

Latest comments

There are no comments on this article yet. Why not be the first to post one?

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.