Sections

Find out how to kick start your games industry career

Get Your Free Ticket Today

Ubisoft apologises for ableist description in Assassin's Creed Valhalla

The publisher said it will address the issue in an upcoming update

Ubisoft apologised for using ableist language in Assassin's Creed Valhalla.

Courtney Craven, founder of Can I Play That -- a games publication for disabled gamers, focusing on accessibility -- called out Ubisoft for the way it described a character with severe burns in the latest Assassin's Creed entry, PC Gamer reported.

The description read: "Horribly burned in a childhood accident, Eorforwine is terrified someone will see her disfigured face. She relieves her fury with bursts of violence."

Craven said on Twitter that it is important to address such language, adding that it is "unacceptable to talk about facial differences this way."

"Writers for games and otherwise need to do better," they said. "GF, who is a burn victim and spent many years ashamed of her scars, was sitting beside me when I came upon this bit in the game and the look on her face... I was embarrassed that this was her impression of this industry I love so much."

Ubisoft replied on Twitter, apologising for "unintentionally reinforcing ableism through this language," and said it will remove it in an upcoming update. When it will do so is unclear at this stage.

Assassin's Creed Valhalla released yesterday. In our Critical Consensus, we noted that critics agreed that it is one of the very best games in the series, but its underlying themes are tainted by Ubisoft's year of scandal.

Find out how to kick start your games industry career

Get Your Free Ticket Today

More stories

Ubisoft employees upset with lack of communication on misconduct reports

Multiple developers told Kotaku the publisher's maze-like complaint process lacks follow-up, transparency, and in many cases resolution

By Brendan Sinclair

Ubisoft employees call for removal of 'role model' evaluation goal over concerns of misuse

Group claims it could favour abusers, but publisher maintains it is part of changes for "safe, respectful and inclusive workplace"

By James Batchelor

Latest comments

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.