Sections

Find out how to kick start your games industry career

Get Your Free Ticket Today

UK charity calls on government to regulate loot boxes

The Royal Society for Public Health releases report on attitude of young people toward loot boxes

The Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) has called on the newly elected British government to implement tight restrictions on loot boxes in video games.

The call is joined by a report titled Skins in the Game, which alleges the normalisation of gambling in video games.

Based on research funded by charity GambleAware, the report found that the majority of young people see both loot boxes (58%) and skin betting (60%) as "forms of highly addictive gambling."

The survey was conducted on over 1,000 young people living in the UK, aged between 11 and 24.

Based on the report, the RSPH is now calling on the government to legally recognise loot boxes and skin betting as forms of gambling.

"Young people have told us that gambling and gambling-like activity are slowly but surely polluting hobbies and past-times that have traditionally been beneficial to their wellbeing," said RSPH chief executive Shirley Cramer.

"Today, the vast majority of young people take part regularly in video-gaming and no doubt many will receive video games as Christmas presents. However we, and the young people we've spoken to are concerned at how firmly embedded gambling-type features are in many of these games.

"The rise of loot boxes and skin betting have seen young people introduced to the same mechanisms that underpin gambling, through an industry that operates unchecked and unregulated on the back alleys of the internet, which young people can access from their bedrooms."

This call comes just months after the Department for Digital, Media, Culture, and Sport released its inquiry report into immersive and addictive technologies.

The report was the result of months of evidence gathering, and proposed that loot boxes be regulated under under gambling law.

For the record: This article previously stated it was the Royal Society for the Protection of Health, rather than the Royal Society for Public Health, and has been amended accordingly.

Find out how to kick start your games industry career

Get Your Free Ticket Today

More stories

Over 200 Chinese games firms reportedly vow to self-regulate in face of new restrictions

Statement from state-backed gaming association suggests firms will use facial recognition to identify minors

By James Batchelor

China trials website for public to report games violating new restrictions

Players encouraged to identify games that don't require real name registration or implement time and spending limits

By James Batchelor

Latest comments (1)

Neil Young Programmer, Rebellion DevelopmentsA year ago
"Royal Society for Public Health", I think?

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Neil Young on 20th December 2019 12:59pm

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.