Riot says women waived right to sue when they were hired

League of Legends maker wants to enforce private arbitration clauses for gender discrimination claims

Riot Games is looking to keep some of the lawsuits it's facing for alleged gender discrimination out of the courts.

Kotaku today reported that the League of Legends maker has motioned for two of five gender discrimination lawsuits to be subject to private arbitration hearings instead.

The reasoning behind the motions is that the two women in question signed arbitration clauses with Riot when they were hired. Riot noted that "claims for discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, as well as for wages due, are expressly listed" in the agreements signed.

A Cornell study of private arbitration outcomes found that employees win less often than they do in legal proceedings, and when they do win, are awarded "substantially lower" amounts. The practice is controversial enough that last year, Google, Facebook, and Uber all dropped their forced arbitration clauses for cases involving sexual harassment and assault. Google followed that up in February by abandoning the practice for all employee disputes.

Last August, Kotaku ran an extensive account of the work culture at Riot, with dozens of then-current and former employees of the studio speaking to a company culture that refused to hire women into leadership roles, subjected them to gendered remarks and overt day-to-day sexual harassment, and pressured them to leave after they complained. After the piece ran, Riot released a statement saying, "We recognise we still have work to do to achieve our goals, which starts with listening to feedback from Rioters and others, and providing Rioters with the guidance and resources they need to uphold our values."

After Riot filed its motions to force arbitration, the plaintiff's lawyer Ryan Saba responded, saying, "Today's actions only serve to silence the voices of individuals who speak out against such misconduct and demonstrate that the company's words were no more than lip service."

A Riot representative told Kotaku, "While we won't discuss details about ongoing litigation, we look forward to resolving all matters through the appropriate processes." The representative added that the company is reviewing "all of our procedures and policies, including those related to arbitration."

Related stories

Riot forms governing body for scholastic esports

Riot Scholastic Association of America to oversee high school and collegiate League of Legends competitions

By Brendan Sinclair

Riot Games stands firm against walkout employees' demands

UPDATE: League of Legends developer describes walkout as an "important moment" for the company, details changes made as a result

By James Batchelor

Latest comments (2)

Bonnie Patterson Narrative Designer, Writer 25 days ago
Honestly, this sounds like Riot massively missing the point of anti-discrimination and anti-harassment legislation.

The point is not to treat people badly and then get away with it or pay as little as possible.

The point is NOT TO DO IT or at least, NOT WANT TO DO IT, and if it happens, MAKE IT RIGHT.
6Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Adam Campbell Game Manager, Azoomee24 days ago
At this stage, I'm not sure how they can do any worse on this issue than they are.
4Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.