Find out how to kick start your games industry career

Get Your Free Ticket Today

Gender pay gap widens in UK games industry

Women increase their representation throughout gaming, but median wages losing ground

The UK industry gender pay gap widened last year by 3.5%, and continues to be well above national averages in terms of inequality.

According to the latest government figures, the median gender wage disparity is 18.8% compared to a national median wage gap of 9.6%.

Over 10,000 companies submitted their data. Of the 19 games-related companies identified , every single one paid women a lower median wage than men.

While the data is not detailed enough to provide an examination of equal pay for equal work, it does shine a light on inequality in the industry in areas such as median pay disparity, difference in bonus pay, and number of high-ranking female employees.

Additionally, given that only companies with more than 250 UK staff were legally required to submit data, there are several notable omissions including Activision, Ninja Theory, Nintendo UK, Sega, Team17, and Playground Games.

Some companies, such as Rockstar North, include data for subsidiaries while King is considered a separate entity from Activision and is reported by the government as

The three companies with the largest gender wage gap remained the same as 2017, though the order has shifted around a little.

Rockstar North now has the largest median wage gap at 34.4%, followed closely by Codemasters with 33.3% and Sumo Digital with 32.6%.

While Rockstar and Codemasters' median wage gap grew by 2.5% and 5.4% respectively, Sumo Digital saw its gap shrink by just under 2%.

Meanwhile, GAME (0.3% ), Inspired Gaming (1.5%), PlayNation (3.8%) , and Namco (4%) and all had the narrowest gender wage gap, which was narrower than both industry and national averages.

Median wage gap in the UK games industry

Median wage gap in the UK games industry

In public statements addressing the wage gap, the running theme was that female employees were receiving equal pay for equal work, but the disparity comes from a lack of women working in the industry.

"It is widely acknowledged that encouraging women into the industry starts at a young age, as such, we are working in partnership with schools and colleges in the community to help educate, attract and inspire girls and young women into an education in STEM subjects," said Codemasters CEO Frank Sagnier.

"Concurrently, we have committed to a series of university lectures, games education summits and school career days all with the aim of promoting Codemasters and attracting the next generation of talent, regardless of gender."

It was a sentiment echoed by Sumo managing director Paul Porter who said: "While Sumo's gender pay gap results for 2018 are a slight improvement on the previous year, we recognize there is much more we need to do. We are investing in quantifiable, sustainable initiatives designed to have a positive impact on reducing the gap in the coming years."

Even so, gender diversity in the games industry did actually improve across all four pay quartiles -- though by the narrowest of margins.

It tilts overwhelmingly towards men, especially in the top quartile where on average just 14.2% of employees are women (up 0.3% year-on-year).

The games industry still lags behind other sectors overall, where the average for women employed in the top pay quartile 39.7%.

The best companies for women represented in the top quartile were King (33%), Namco (31%), Electronic Arts (23%), and GAME (22%).

Sumo Digital had the lowest percentage of women in the top quartile with just 4%, followed by TT Games (4.2%), The Creative Assembly (4.5%), Ubisoft Reflections (5.6%), Jagex (6.1%), and Codemasters (7%).

Women working in top quartile by company

Women working in top quartile by company

Finally, the games industry is still a more generous sector on average than other UK industries when it comes to bonus payouts, though women still receive fewer payments than men.

On average, 56.3% of women in the industry received a bonus in 2018 compared to 62.2% of men; the national average is 34.5% and 35.8% respectively.

Inspired Gaming, Ubisoft Reflections, and Namco all presented notable figures for the amount of money paid out in bonuses, leaning heavily in favour of women. According to the data, the median women's bonus payment was 725% more than men's at Inspired, 292.3% more at Ubisoft Reflections, and 112.6% more at Namco.

Every other company except for GAME, which gave equal bonuses to men an women, paid men more money in bonuses. The median gap ranged from as low as 3.2% at online gambling software firm Gaming Technology Solutions, to 62.5% at Rockstar North.

"The gender pay gap reporting can help us to diagnose the problem, and going forward with a commitment from all sides to improvement, they could also help provide a solution," said Women in Games CEO Marie-Claire Issaman.

"Some employers have said it's not our fault that there are too few women in the sector. In reality studios do need to work more closely with the educational pipeline, target their job adverts and working culture as well as commit to working with third-party, not for profit organisations, such as Women in Games who can provide invaluable expertise and specialist knowledge."

This is only the second year since the UK government introduced legislation requiring companies to report gender pay gap data. However, it was the first year which saw Ubisoft Reflections and Splash Damage compelled to submit data.

While this indicates wider industry growth, it also serves to highlight inequality as both companies have a larger gender pay gap than the industry median.

Find out how to kick start your games industry career

Get Your Free Ticket Today

More stories

Over 200 Chinese games firms reportedly vow to self-regulate in face of new restrictions

Statement from state-backed gaming association suggests firms will use facial recognition to identify minors

By James Batchelor

China trials website for public to report games violating new restrictions

Players encouraged to identify games that don't require real name registration or implement time and spending limits

By James Batchelor

Latest comments (2)

Bonnie Patterson Narrative Designer, Writer 2 years ago
Looking at the recent pay gap debate in parliament*, it's not just the games industry that's gotten worse at paying women. The gap has widened across the board.

As Victoria Atkins points out in that debate, addressing the inequity in the numbers of women employed in technical fields - while a different problem to the pay gap - is something that has to start in schools, but also with parents. I'm interested to hear more about the action she alludes to, to inspire girls at the early school level.

More families are now giving their daughters "engineering" toys such as Lego and Mechano (I had the Lego Millennium Falcon because my parents were win). This has been helped by such toys being promoted in a more "gender-neutral" manner, and by offering more diverse entry points to play - you can have ponies and princesses alongside lasers and fire departments. (Is that Lego City playset that looks like the end of Firewatch real? I want one.)

But children still tend to mimic the people they see in their lives, and women still make up the majority of "homemakers" so it's more difficult for parents to provide an in-house example of ways to be a woman that don't involve building a nest (or ways to be a man that do). That's why we've got to push the image elsewhere, and get the idea into children's heads across the board that games are for everyone, coding is for everyone, and that they will be welcome among us, treated professionally and urged to thrive regardless of skin, hair or genitalia.

By and large, girls tend to step away from STEM fields for a number of reasons, but a primary one is that working in STEM never occurs to them because it's not floating around out there as an option to be presented to girls, just as nobody thinks of suggesting legal or medical secretary instead of first-line IT support to boys.

BUT that is a different issue to the gender pay gap being monitored right now. It doesn't help that two different things are often labelled with the same term.

There is the pay gap between women and men across all industries and roles, which tells us that there are factors that push women towards lower-paid, more social roles, and that is useful to those who study vulnerability to poverty, impact of child-rearing, educational biases and such things. It's still a bad thing to have, but involves more complex societal interactions and influences than direct discrimination.

The pay gap under debate at the moment is the other one - of two individuals with the same roles and responsibilities, working roughly the same hours at the same company, one is paid less, and that one is most often a woman. And now, it's a woman more often than it was last year, and the pay difference is bigger.

Misogynist Twitter will try to convince you that gender pay gap numbers compare pediatricians with surgeons. They don't. They compare two surgeons of the same speciality at the same hospital working the same core hours with the same amount of overtime.

It needn't be because of an overt prejudice - an "I hate women so I'm giving this one £50 a day less than god old Johnny boy." But imagine you're trying to save money while your staff are fed up with pay rises that don't meet inflation. Who is least intimidating to disappoint?

* - A bloody addictive site this is too - you can see which MPs are doing their jobs in parliament and which are wasting time being the guy who speaks because he has to say something.
4Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Tom Keresztes Programmer 2 years ago
@Bonnie Patterson:
Misogynist Twitter will try to convince you that gender pay gap numbers compare pediatricians with surgeons. They don't. They compare two surgeons of the same speciality at the same hospital working the same core hours with the same amount of overtime.
Actually, in this case, they do compare paediatricians, surgeons and cleaners. This survey only contains mean, median averages for pay, bonus and proportion of women per pay quarter . There is nothing in this survey about roles or titles.
From the gender pay gap portal ( :
The mean hourly rate is the average hourly wage across the entire organisation so the mean gender pay gap is a measure of the difference between women’s mean hourly wage and men’s mean hourly wage.

The median hourly rate is calculated by ranking all employees from the highest paid to the lowest paid, and taking the hourly wage of the person in the middle; so the median gender pay gap is the difference between women’s median hourly wage (the middle paid woman) and men’s median hourly wage (the middle paid man).
5Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.