Blizzard shuts down legacy WoW server hours after launch

Four years of work on Burning Crusade server brought to an end within five hours of launch

Blizzard shut down a fan-run, legacy World of Warcraft server just a few hours after it went live, bringing four years of work to an abrupt end.

The "Felmyst" server was intended to emulate WoW's first expansion pack, Burning Crusade, which launched in January 2007. A Reddit post by the server's creator, who uses the name "Gummy52", teased last week's launch, stating an aim to, "set a new standard in warcraft emulation."

However, that dream was short-lived. As Ars Technica reports, Blizzard issued a cease-and-desist letter through the legal firm Mitchell Silberberg and Knupp LLP, which arrived at Gummy52's door within five hours of Felmyst going live, and cited breach of Blizzard's copyrights.

Blizzard has a track record in this area. In April 2016, it ordered that a vanilla WoW legacy server, Nostalrius, be taken offline. The company subsequently discussed the possibility of offering its fans a similar experience in an official capacity, but it hasn't committed to any specific plan.

Gummy52 had operated a WoW server in the past, called Scriptcraft, which escaped Blizzard's notice. In an open letter published after Felmyst was shut down, Gummy52 said, "I gambled that we could cap the servers at 3k and enjoy a close community." Ultimately, the public interest in Felmyst was its downfall.

"The problem with private servers is that there is no middle ground," Gummy52 continued. "If people expect a server to 'only' have 3000 (real) players then they just won't play and you'll instead end up with 300, which isn't playable."

Gummy52 cited a medical condition, muscular dystrophy, as the reason the work didn't stop when Blizzard took a more active stance on fan-run servers last year. "Last year's news of what Blizzard was doing came at the absolute worst time for me, frankly, with so many years already invested."

It is also the reason why Felmyst cannot be moved to a different country and operated from there. "I'm not really able to live on my own," Gummy52 added. "That is also the reason I've been able to work mostly full time on this project as I'm unemployed, though I have sacrificed much of my well being dedicating everything I have to this. Why am I disclosing this? I'm not really sure, but I feel compelled to."

More stories

Blizzard faces poposed class-action lawsuit over Hearthstone card packs

Suit argues packs deceive minors into making non-refundable purchases, Blizzard attempting to move case to another court

By James Batchelor

You can't quantify DEI, Activision Blizzard | Opinion

Gaming firm's latest gaffe is a reminder that game companies have a long way to go for inclusivity

By Jeffrey Rousseau

Latest comments (1)

Aleksi Ranta Category Management Project Manager 4 years ago
while this is might be considered to some degree sad and not community friendly action on Blizzards part, it also makes me somewhat sick to my stomach to see a "pity" angle brought up. Business is business and moses is moses.

Please do an editorial/story as to WHY companies NEED to protect their trademarks. Bring some perspective into to mix. These stories are horrendously one sided and have been for years, and not just on this site but everywhere else. Same goes for Nintendo taking down some fan projects.

Trademarks need to be protected because giving someone a free pass = everyone getting a free pass.

But yes, im not suprised action was taken, and yes, im in Blizzards corner one this one.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.