Blizzard phasing out branding

After 20 years, World of Warcraft maker decides its networking services don't need their own moniker has long been virtually synonymous with Blizzard, but the World of Warcraft publisher will soon make it actually synonymous as well. The company today announced that it will retire the branding and simply refer to it as "Blizzard tech."

"When we created, the idea of including a tailored online-gaming service together with your game was more of a novel concept, so we put a lot of focus on explaining what the service was and how it worked, including giving it a distinct name," the company explained in a blog post. "Over time, though, we've seen that there's been occasional confusion and inefficiencies related to having two separate identities under which everything falls--Blizzard and Given that built-in multiplayer support is a well-understood concept and more of a normal expectation these days, there isn't as much of a need to maintain a separate identity for what is essentially our networking technology."

The company has already taken some steps away from the name, such as introducing new features like Blizzard Voice chat and Blizzard Streaming under the company branding. The company said it will institute further changes in the next several months.

Launched alongside Diablo in 1996, was originally used for chat and multiplayer matchmaking. Over time, the service became more fully featured, and was made mandatory for modern Blizzard games like Diablo III, Hearthstone, and Overwatch.

Related stories

Overwatch: Building an esport from the ground up

At the DICE Summit, Mike Morhaime, Nate Nazer, and Kim Phan discussed the publisher's approach to establishing Overwatch as a top flight esport

By Haydn Taylor

Overwatch director says toxicity not solved, but improving

Abusive chat is down 17% and player reports are up 20% as Blizzard's Jeff Kaplan says "we're restoring faith in the system"

By Brendan Sinclair

Latest comments (1)

Andreia Quinta Photographer, Studio52 LondonA year ago
I believe your link to the blog post is incorrect as it links to a password protected preview here at, I think what you are meaning to link to is this.

Feel free to delete this comment after fixing it ^^
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.