Sections

Mobile marketing costs continue to rise exponentially

User acquisition and retention has never been so expensive, says Fiksu

The main metrics governing the cost of user acquisition and retention for mobile apps continue to rise sharply year on year, says mobile data firm Fiksu, with cost per install and cost per launch both rising sharply over the last few months.

Although the data released yesterday covers all apps rather than just games, previous game-specific figures from the firm indicate that games are following a very similar trend. With the cost of building a loyal audience spiralling, breaking into the top-grossing charts has never been more difficult.

iOS CPL increased 75% YoY, Android 169%.

iOS CPL increased 75% YoY, Android 169%.

However, Fiksu also sees money being spent more smartly, with better targeting and more fine tuning of the acquisition process leading to better customer retention overall.

"The trend line towards spending more on mobile continues: increased attention to mobile and willingness to spend to reach the 'right' app users is evident, and with that, costs have been rising," reads the report. "Higher-value sources, such as Facebook and video ads, cost more on a per-install basis but lead to higher-quality results. In addition, an increased focus on retargeting-to retain users and convert them to loyal users-allows advertisers to obtain higher loyalty rates. As demonstrated this month, the cost-per-install (CPI) and the cost to acquire a loyal user (CPLU) will eventually move closer together, and even converge, as targeting capabilities continue to improve, and each install is more likely to become a loyal user."

iOS CPI is up 54% since last year, Android 59%.

iOS CPI is up 54% since last year, Android 59%.

Related stories

Android cost-per-install down in July

Fiksu finds acquisition price on Google's OS continues decline, nears parity with modestly rising iOS CPI

By Brendan Sinclair

CPI continues to climb on iOS and Android

Fiksu data shows iOS climbing faster, but remains the most cost-effective platform

By Matthew Handrahan

Latest comments

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.