Gi Live London graphic

Connect with the UK Video Games Industry

Buy Your Tickets Today
Gi Live London graphic

Steam pulls game over Gabe Newell death threat

UPDATE: Developer responsible leaves Code Avarice


Michael Maulbeck is leaving Paranautical Activity studio Code Avarice after threatening Valve's Gabe Newell on Twitter. He published a statement this morning explaining his departure.

"As a result of my actions, Paranautical Activity, a game made by 4 or 5 people depending on who you count as team members, was removed from steam. I feel is it my responsibility to step down from Code Avarice completely so that Steam has no reason to harbor any more ill will towards the company, and maybe even if we can't see Paranautical Activity restored, at least future Code Avarice games may be allowed onto the platform."

He apologised to Valve and Gabe Newell and explained he has had issues with anger management for some time.

"My temper and tendency to use twitter to vent has been a consistent problem since I entered the games industry, and I just can't do it. I don't have the willpower necessary to be the “face” of a company. If I do continue to work in games it'll be as an anonymous 1 of 1000 at some shitty corporation, not the most public figure of a single digit sized team.

"I've sold my half of Code Avarice to Travis. Given up all my rights to CA as a company, and all it's intellectual properties. I won't receive any money from the sale of Paranautical Activity or any future games CA develops, I won't be consulted on business decisions, and I won't have any hand in development."

Original story

Valve has removed the first-person shooter Paranautical Activity from Steam after its creator, Michael Maulbeck, appeared to threaten the life of Gabe Newell.

The turnaround was rapid. Yesterday, the final version of Paranautical Activity was released on Steam, as part of a Halloween-themed selection of games on Valve's popular distribution platform.

However, an error meant that Paranautical Activity was still advertised as being in Early Access, something that Maulbeck believed would hurt the game's chances of commercial success.

I knew this would greatly cripple sales and confuse customers," Maulbeck said in a statement sent to Eurogamer. "I in fact had already begun getting tweets and emails from people claiming I marked it as Early Access myself to try and avoid criticism of the final version."

Maulbeck's response was, first, to contact Valve, and then to embark on an obviously cathartic series of angry tweets, mostly addressing Valve's perceived incompetence - to wit, "Steam is the most incompetent piece of fucking shit" - and the negative impact of Valve's "awful fucking monopoly" on PC developers who rely on Steam's smooth running to find success.

More stories

UK ad regulator issues new guidance on in-game spending

Committee of Advertising Practice details preferred handling of virtual currency pricing and pressure tactics in ads

By Jeffrey Rousseau

EA lays out the plan for Playdemic

EA mobile exec Jeff Karp sees "immediate opportunities" to bring Golf Clash design elements to EA Sports series, potential for "future synergies"

By Brendan Sinclair

Latest comments (21)

Darren Adams Managing Director, ChaosTrend6 years ago
And this my friends is how not to use twitter. ;)
21Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Matthew Handrahan European Deputy Editor, GamesIndustry.biz6 years ago
John: Those numbers are taken directly from Maulbeck's tweets. The gulf is almost certainly vast, but I suppose I would advise a sprinkling of salt in terms of the precision of the numbers. I honestly don't know that I've ever encountered a Twitter feed where it's so difficult to distinguish between a legitimate comment and sarcasm/anger.
5Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Tim Browne Game Studio Design Director, King.com6 years ago
After hearing of this story last night I decided to check out his twitter feed.

I know its easy to say he needs social media training (we all do at times) but some of the things he was saying suggest to me he might need anger management classes. Also once it was pulled he seemed to immediately start complaining and ranting more on twitter.

I wonder if he had perhaps walked away from twitter and then, cap in hand approached Valve to try and sort it out, Valve may have re-instated his game. Instead he's claiming the victim card but really I only see him being a victim of his own stupidity.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Tim Browne on 21st October 2014 11:32am

11Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (21)
Martyn Brown Managing Director, Insight For Hire6 years ago
Small minded, entitled-generation mentality. Have to worry about future generation's communication skills given the ease at which this nonsense is fired and generated from behind a keyboard on twitter and similar. Anyway, with him quitting games, it would appear one less dickhead out there.
13Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Marty Howe Director, Figurehead Studios6 years ago
HI Martyn, im trying to see it from his point of view. As developers, we love our creations so much - so his level of frustration must have been pretty profound for him to threaten a prominent CEO like that.

If I was him I would phone and personally apologize, imagine how it would feel if someone said they wanted to kill you. The internet apology is a good start..
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Martyn Brown Managing Director, Insight For Hire6 years ago
Sorry Marty it's just rampant stupidity on his part. Everyone has frustrations but not everyone can keep them in check. Incredulous lack of communication skills and any kind of consideration of what is an immense structure.
6Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Iain McNulty Person doing things 6 years ago

To be fair, saying "entitled-generation mentality" is a pretty ageist slur. To write off an entire generation as being self-entitled is wrong, especially when there are a lot of hard working young people out there who want to make it in the industry off their own back, and not from hand-outs.

But yeah, this guy threw a tantrum due to a mistake on his game's listing, something which could easily have been resolved with a quick e-mail to Valve. Silly behaviour indeed.
10Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Anthony Chan6 years ago
Maulbeck's response was, first, to contact Valve, and then to embark on an obviously cathartic series of angry tweets, mostly addressing Valve's perceived incompetence - to wit, "Steam is the most incompetent piece of fucking shit" - and the negative impact of Valve's "awful fucking monopoly" on PC developers who rely on Steam's smooth running to find success.
This.... To insult your business partner is already a major no-no in communications and business. Then to follow with a death threat - just wow. I can understand his anger, and that his livelihood is in the direct balance of the mess, but there are NO professional industries that accept this kind of behavior. It is called professionalism. To forgive this man and pretend his behavior is "just a bad day" or accept that he is "human and prone to faults" is not acceptable. Professionalism must exist in all industries from being a server at Mcdonalds or a Car Park attendant to being a CEO in a blue chip firm. If the art industry (music, movies, video games, etc) employ people who can rage at work, it takes away from the credibility and integrity the profession enjoys. Remember, there are young people out there who are taught better manners, discipline, and self-control of their emotions while in school. Many of them will be future developers in Games as well. This is NOT the way to set the example of what is acceptable professional behavior for the Game Development inudstry.
10Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
James Berg Games User Researcher 6 years ago
What a tremendous loss to the developer community. /sarcasm

Raging at a business partner in public is beyond foolish, death threats are an outright crime. Glad Valve is taking a clear and firm stance on this - I don't have high hopes that it'll impact Twitter toxicity, but perhaps it'll help a bit in our little microcosm of it.
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Tim Carter Designer - Writer - Producer 6 years ago
The simplistic view will be to utterly demonize the fellow.

But a more nuanced, complex examination may uncover an element of truth to his beef.

You know in domestic murder cases, they always go something like "Son kills his father because of an argument over [insert trivial issue here]." The invitation is to laugh at the "absurdity" of killing someone for a trivial issue, but a deeper examination reveals that, no... actually the trivial issue masks deeper injustices that were allowed to fester.

I have a game that's been "Greenlit" by Steam. If you were to liken a deal to having babies, my experience of being "Greenlit" is that it's been like having sex with a corpse. Valve does the bare minimum... it gives you some tools and says "You figure it out." It gives no support that you could leverage to... you know.... gather in external support, to crew up, get some bank financing production, etcetera. (That's what a true greenlight is, if say you were going to make a movie.) Rather, Valve leaves you to your own ends. If you can make something of it, they get their cut, but if you can't they don't seem to care.

They are totally disengaged. They throw the spaghetti at the wall and leave it to see what sticks.

You can't dismiss the emotional destruction that this kind of disengagement can manifest into. My feeling of the experience is almost as if I was lured into a trap, having dedicated tremendous emotional commitment to something only to have it left to rot from Valve's perspective.

Sorry, I'm old-fashioned: I would seek a purchase order which I could use as collateral against a standard film-style bank loan. THAT would demonstrate a true greenlight, including emotional commitment and some degree of acceptance of risk.

Edited 2 times. Last edit by Tim Carter on 21st October 2014 6:06pm

2Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Christopher Bowen Editor in Chief, Gaming Bus6 years ago
Nuance? No. He threatened to kill a person over something easily fixable. I have no problem watching his career go down in flames. Full stop.
6Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Andrew Goodchild Studying development, Train2Game6 years ago
It seems he is lucky to not be at least questioned by the police. Remembering the guy over here who got in a lot of trouble over his joke about blowing an airport sky high, and as this clearly is not an anonymous account, that bit of idiocy could lead to worse than the offended party cutting off business relations.

"If I do continue to work in games it'll be as an anonymous 1 of 1000 at some shitty corporation,"
I'm not sure many large corporations look kindly to being called shitty by prospective candidates. I think maybe he should never make a statement, tweet or blog post again.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Andrew Goodchild on 21st October 2014 9:31pm

3Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Tim Carter Designer - Writer - Producer 6 years ago
Eric Berne, the psychologist and author of "Games People Play" identifies one game: "Now I've Got You, You Son of a Bitch".

In NIGYYSOB, White crosses an unacceptable line. Okay, so that's bad enough. But the real player is Black. Black uses White's mistake as an excuse to vent his spleen and utterly destroy White.

Sounds like you'd be a player of that game.

Edited 2 times. Last edit by Tim Carter on 21st October 2014 9:42pm

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Morville O'Driscoll Blogger & Critic 6 years ago
@ Tim

That sounds like so many things nowadays (not just in gaming, but generally). :( Think I'll have to have a look at that book. Thanks. :)
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Paul Jace Merchandiser 6 years ago
Twitter: Launched July 2006
274 million active users

Facebook: Launched February 2004
1.32 billion active users

Fired for angry rants and or disrespectful/shameful behavior on one or the other: 30 million and growing everyday

Perhaps Mr. Maulbeck should have read our "House Rules" thread for proper internet etiquette:

Edited 2 times. Last edit by Paul Jace on 22nd October 2014 12:39am

2Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Shane Sweeney Academic 6 years ago
What a different world we live in. Gave Newell was once known for his online temper tantrums but now that he is the establishment can wield a mighty sword. Admittedly, Newell posting ragey messages on a forum to a few hundred barely connected people is very different to how we relate via Twitter. Twitter might as well be a press release, and in no reality is what he said okay.

I have little sympathy For Maulbeck, but I suspect during their younger years Carmack, Romero, Garriot or even the Oliver twins would of got into quite a lot of social media trouble had it existed during there most trying times. Lest we forget Derrick Smarts biggest flame war which predates forums let alone social media. Yes, we all agree Maulbeck should of known better but had social media existed previously we would have countless other examples to draw on so we shouldn't judge his generation too harshly.

I think the biggest thing to take away from this is a chilling reminder about how powerful Valve really is and despite the openess of the PC platform economic survivability does depend on a single gatekeeper without a real transparent place to deal with grievances.

Is the games industry really a better off place now that we can't burn bridges at least sometimes?

Edited 2 times. Last edit by Shane Sweeney on 22nd October 2014 1:50pm

2Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Darren Adams Managing Director, ChaosTrend6 years ago

I also have a Greenlit title but see it in a different way from the way you see it.

Valve set up a digital shop many years ago and there are costs to building/running that shop. They worked hard for 10 years+ to fine tune the platform and build up a reputation, even though there were many people fighting against them. Now they have fought through that they are now the biggest PC digital platform.

It is a huge potential market and I want to use their platform for my own gains, so I will pay a price to do so. I will make more money if I sell the game on Steam, which I could not make myself if I went all lone wolf on its release. I am happy to give valve their percentage for the store page alone.

I don't expect them to give me anything other than a store page, why would they??? To expect anything other than a place on their store is essentially as Martyn so eloquently pointed out "entitled-generation mentality". You made a deal with Valve when you put your game up and the deal was "I supply the game, you give me store page", nothing more.

Bad mouthing a potential business partner online for the world to see could be a career ending furk up that cannot really be excused. For all you know someone from Valve frequents here (entirely possible) and will see your post as an attack on them and take your game down. Probably not, but who knows....

Edited 3 times. Last edit by Darren Adams on 22nd October 2014 1:30pm

5Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Christopher Ashton Carlos Software Programmer 6 years ago
I don't understand why it would be so hard to tweet "Hey guys, Steam says it is early access, but the full game is out!" and do some management that way, while trying to contact Valve to fix the error and also state you're in process of doing so to clear up the confusion. I mean, isn't that just a given...? I understand development can be hard and take its toll on people, but stopping to think and take a moment to relax is what I believe most developers are practiced with already (like when coming up to a problem that is not being resolved in the manner they expected.)

I feel if anything developing and programming have taught me to be more patient, to not jump the gun, and always to think of alternate solutions before, during, and after the event has occurred.
3Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Christopher Ashton Carlos Software Programmer 6 years ago
Honestly, I believe these days having a "joke" or "sarcastic" or even "figure of speech" such as "killing/raping/etc." someone and passing it off as such is just poor taste. Why are such things even considered a joke? Frankly, I believe they are completely unnecessary in any context, especially when in aimed at someone you do not know at all. For all we know it would have been serious, or it was not. It doesn't matter, but to someone who doesn't know this person, these are words of hate and wishing harm upon another for something stupid. Also, frankly I think it just demonstrates a persons' poor behavior habits and anger management.

There are other ways to express your frustration with someone, but saying "I would kill X" even though they personally had no hand in the issue is just plain wrong and shouldn't be taken lightly. We live often in times where everyone needs to have "tough skin" or "lighten up" (which is it?), but overall we don't have people take ownership of their words, and allow them to fire off anything in the name of "sarcasm" and "figuratively speaking." Sometimes we forget, people are people... and some of those people have probably encountered similar scenarios already. (Rape, murder, etc.) So you don't know "funny" it is to that other person, now do you?
4Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Alfonso Sexto Lead Tester, Ubisoft Germany6 years ago
You know? I too sometimes I feel like ranting out, specially after those days of work in which everything seems to go opposite to what was planned. But I don't. Period. It's just not correct.

By the way: Those seven guys who liked the twits and the guy who re-twitted? what was there to like?
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Paul Johnson Managing Director / Lead code monkey, Rubicon Development6 years ago
I would give my right testicle to get our games on Steam. How come this moron managed it. :(
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.