The Astronauts: 'It's just a game' design

Adrian Chmielarz on moving beyond his intuition with The Vanishing of Ethan Carter

Adrian Chmielarz is a great believer in freedom. His experiences making Bulletstorm with People Can Fly clearly illustrated the weaknesses inherent in the game-on-a-disc-for-$60 model on which the AAA industry had come to rely. The practical demands of distribution, marketing and retail were so suffocating that they had become as influential on the content of games as the whims of the people making them. For Chmielarz, the commercial failure of Bulletstorm was a symptom of that system being brought to its knees. It was difficult, certainly, but it was necessary to usher in a new and vibrant era of creativity.

And it all comes down to freedom. The freedom to tell any story at any length, to find the right audience and set the right price. Chmielarz has no illusions that achieving success will be any easier for The Astronauts, his new studio, than it was for People Can Fly, but there is an opportunity for independent developers to supplement the limited palette of AAA gaming, and to do so on their own terms.

"What we had in those games [Painkiller and Bulletstorm] was, in part at least, a response to what was happening in the shooter genre and the shooter market at that time. We felt that it lacked imagination, it lacked spark, it was becoming boring. And that's incredible," Chmielarz says.

"These are games where you press the trigger and bullets come out. It's instant gratification and, to be honest, that core combat loop is one of the easiest things to make. So, in theory, we should see a lot of really imaginative shooters out there, but that wasn't the case. It was puzzling to us, so - I know it's a cliched saying - we made the games that we wanted to play."

If that felt like original thinking at the time, Chmielarz became a harsher critic of his work after he left People Can Fly. Certainly, when placed next to many of their peers Painkiller and Bulletstorm still seem refreshing, and Chmielarz is clearly proud of what they accomplished, but he now holds himself to a different set of standards. After a lifetime of playing games, Chmielarz says, it's perfectly possible for a designer to get results by intuition alone, drawing from the visceral memory of play rather than any real understanding of how to push forward and break new ground.

"I feel like the more I know the less I know. I'm still learning"

"I was happy that Painkiller was fun and Bulletstorm was fun, but I didn't really have any theory behind what worked and what didn't. It was like, 'I feel like I can do more,' but I didn't have enough knowledge about what needs to change to achieve progress in games as storytelling devices. I started to realise how many things in design are basically what designers do without deep, deep understanding of how it truly affects the player."

When a developer talks about the medium in this way it's easy to dismiss as bravado or conceit, but Chmielarz obviously doesn't see himself as separate from or superior to others in his craft. Quite the opposite, in fact; Chmielarz sees himself as part of a community, the conversation littered with references to the thoughts and theories of his fellow developers, some of whom have had a profound influence on the way he approaches game design. Chmielarz now wants to make games that transcend twitchy gameplay loops and attain something more resonant and profound. He freely admits that he doesn't yet have the answers, but that's the wellspring of his enthusiasm - nobody knows, but little by little they're figuring it out

"I feel like the more I know the less I know. I'm still learning," he says. "But I wish that more designers would join us all in this because... Let me just give you an example: less than a year ago I was talking with a couple of AAA designers, and I mentioned the idea of 'ludonarrative dissonance.' Now, I use that term as an obvious thing - it's obviously a problem facing game designers - but they told me that they didn't really care. 'Nah, it's just a game.'

"My jaw dropped. It's a very simple concept, and if you question that then we have a serious problem. But that's the case, and when I play games I always see this kind of thinking. In a way, it can be described as: 'It's just a game' design."

"I was happy that Painkiller was fun and Bulletstorm was fun, but I didn't really have any theory behind what worked and what didn't"

Chmielarz offers the widely lauded Gone Home as a counterexample to this tendency: In that game, The Fullbright Company found a synthesis between the game's premise and the player's actions that felt coherent and complete. At a fundamental level it employed the same basic set of mechanics used to ransack cottages in Skyrim, but by setting the game in a unique time and place, and by limiting the possible interactions with care and consideration, it created a more powerful emotional experience than most studios have managed with ten times the resources. It was a two hour game about exploring a house in humdrum Nineties suburbia, and yet it was one of the most remarkable creative feats of last year. Fortunately, Chmielarz says, Gone Home is just one of many.

"These new games are looking at the language of what we have so far, and seeing game design from a different angle. It's beautiful in a way. On the one hand you have these entertaining linear stories, which should not work as a game but they do, like To The Moon. On the other hand you have what is basically an interactive movie, like Telltale's The Walking Dead. And then on another hand you have what Quantic Dream is doing, which is their own thing. And then you have Frictional, who with SOMA is going down a completely new route. They are all using the established language of video games, but in a very fresh way. At The Astronauts we're just looking left and right, trying to figure out the formula.

"But," he smiles, "we might not need a formula at all."

I point out that, on paper and in practice, Gone Home doesn't seem to care about the one quality for which almost every game seems to strive, and on which the majority of games are sold: Fun. The same would appear to be true of The Astronauts first project, The Vanishing of Ethan Carter, a kind of neo-adventure game in which the player controls a detective with second-sight attempting to locate a kidnapped child. There will be violence, Chmielarz says, but not the flippant avalanche of mayhem found in a game like Bulletstorm; Ethan Carter's violence will be used sparingly, and it will be all the more disturbing for it.

"Whatever feeling is involved, as long as it's not boring then we're doing our jobs"

Sure enough, the Ethan Carter footage Chmielarz shows at Digital Dragons features careful exploration, quiet observation, at least one horrifically mutilated corpse, but precious little that could safely be described as 'fun'. Chmielarz admits that 'fun' isn't what The Astronauts' team is aiming for, but, even in the refined air of 2014, it's still difficult to approach the marketing for any game without resorting to that sort of language.

"Actually, the perfect word to describe it comes from a blog post by Chris Pruett of Robot Invader: 'Omoshiroi', which is apparently a Japanese word that means 'interesting' or 'fun'. But space travel is interesting and it can't necessarily be called fun, so what exactly is the meaning of that word? Chris had a Eureka moment where he realised that 'Omoshiroi' really means 'not boring'. That's how I look at it now.

"Whether it makes you laugh or cry or whatever feeling is involved, as long as it's not boring then we're doing our jobs."

To read the first part of our conversation with Adrian Chmielarz, follow the link.

More stories

Astronauts' Ethan Carter sells 60K in first month

"When you dig deep, you will see that 60K copies is actually pretty good"

By Rachel Weber

The Astronauts: "In 2014, $60 for a game is a little insane"

Creative director Adrian Chmielarz on the lessons of Bulletstorm and the problem with price-points

By Matthew Handrahan

Latest comments (6)

Ron Dippold Software/Firmware Engineer 8 years ago
'Fun' is a really bad metric. Its just one axis of engagement.

You could even argue that most F2P games are not about Fun at all. They're about hooking you into to the basic ludic loop of reward that you mistake for fun and then punishing you so hard you're willing to pay money to mitigate the pain and get the reward back. That's the opposite of fun. /Most/ games are not fun - only if you cackle with glee, or at least grin, is it fun. Goat Simulator is fun.

Bulletstorm was a hell of a lot of fun as long as you approached it as a skill game rather than the FPS game most people thought it was. Once you start seeing what obscene combos you can come up with it's an absolute blast. I cackled SO MUCH.

Gone Home wasn't 'fun', but I enjoyed it a lot. And I respect Adrian and I'm looking forward to this one too - 'not boring' is a much better goal than 'fun'. Even if (gawd forbid) it's a failure I think it'll be a good one. Give me something I haven't seen yet.

Edit: Quantify the Bulletstorm Cackle Metric

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Ron Dippold on 6th June 2014 8:44am

2Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Marty Howe Director, Figurehead Studios8 years ago
if 'fun' is just one axis of engagement, can you list what the other axis's of engagement are?
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Guillermo Aguilera Bugallo Senior Game Designer, U-play studios8 years ago
Some people mixing up action with fun, but event the more slow pace game need to be fun.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (6)
Jonathan Burroughs Game Developer, Variable State8 years ago
I feel like we're still coming to terms with commercial video games bumping up against more formal interactive art. Video games' legacy is more associated with parlour games and competitive sports, where competition and mastery are core. And the adrenaline thrill, the delight in victory, is seen as the prime motivator for player engagement. But if you look to other media you see audiences emotionally engaged with forms and narratives which aren't intended to be fun at all. The Road isn't a fun read. The Holy Bible isn't fun listening. But they're stimulating and evocative. And formal art recognises this. And has embodied this in installation art and interactive works. It really feels like the commoditised retail world of video games is starting to wake up to there being a market for these experiences too. By which I'm not saying "yay, opportunity to make a fast buck off the feels". But if you're an artist you can legitimately explore these spaces and do so with the comfort of probably receiving sufficient return on investment that you can continue being creative.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Ron Dippold Software/Firmware Engineer 8 years ago
@Marty, I certainly don't know all of the axes of engagement, or I'd be Mark Cerny! But here's a couple others I can think of:
- Puzzle solving: There's immense satisfaction when a solution clicks, but I wouldn't call it 'fun'. Dopamine rush.
- Story: I think we've all played games with bad mechanics just because we were hooked by the story.
- Sense of wonder/spectacle: Unfinished Swan later levels, Uncharted 2's train level, Rez
- Creative satisfaction: Building stuff in Minecraft, etc.
- Compulsive: Just... need... to get... that last... achievement.
- In the zone: Games like Waves, Geometry Wars, Pixeljunk Eden, etc are amazingly soothing and rewarding if you get in the zone.
- Hate: This is a strange one, but sometimes games piss us off so much we keep playing them just to get more justification of how horrible they are. Like this guy lovingly detailing everything he hates about Watch_Dogs
- Griefing: Obviously, some people get a lot of satisfaction out of messing with other people. This might actually qualify as fun - it's not my thing, I don't know! I don't think The Great Betrayal in Eve Online would count as fun though. That's cold revenge.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Marty Howe Director, Figurehead Studios8 years ago
Thanks Ron. Just make it fun. Keep it simple.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.