Sony, Nintendo aim to appeal to mobile developers

Far from putting their IP on mobile phones, Japan's platform holders want mobile developers to come to them

Have you ever been on a busy train carriage which pulls up to an equally busy station at rush hour? The doors open, and several moments of eyeballing and general unhappiness ensue as the people already on the train realise that yes, all of those people on the crowded platform are definitely going to try to squeeze onto this train. Some shuffle backwards to make room; others puff out their chests and try to claim as much air space around themselves as possible, projecting physically the notion that there's no room at the inn. It never works; puff all you like, you're still going to get a face full of someone's slightly sweaty hair and a peculiarly sharp elbow rammed into your kidneys for the rest of the journey.

"PlayStation Mobile hasn't been all that impressive thus far, and the cost wasn't very high in the first place, but the platform has immense potential"

It's those few moments that I think of when I consider how mobile games businesses and the traditional business - most notably the console platform holder businesses - have considered each other over the past five years. There's been an uneasy standoff in some regards. Some have talked down mobile, while others have expressed fear (or in some instances, rather unseemly joy) at the notion that mobile will kill off dedicated gaming hardware for good. For the first few years, platform holders focused on downplaying the importance of mobile, even as publishers spent huge amounts of money on getting their foot in the door by acquiring hot mobile and social gaming firms (few of whom turned out to be worth the money paid, in the end).

It's increasingly obvious that we're now in stage two of this relationship. The people from the platform have boarded the train, and we're on our way to destinations unknown. It's now crowded and a bit uncomfortable, and some people are going to get crushed. The past year, and the coming years, will see an interesting dance being played out - a jockeying for position, an attempt to remove elbows from ribs or to figure out who ought to be giving up a seat for whom. I wouldn't put much stead by anyone proclaiming to know who's going to be in the best state when they alight at the next station.

Look at the past week's events for some interesting pointers on just how intertwined these businesses are becoming. Sony, which has arguably embraced mobile as part of its core games strategy more than any other platform holder (that's not saying a great deal, admittedly), has completely dropped the cost barrier for developers who want to create games for the PlayStation Mobile platform. PlayStation Mobile hasn't been all that impressive thus far, and the cost wasn't very high in the first place, but the platform has immense potential. Its problem, right now, is that it targets PlayStation Vita and a handful of not terribly popular Android handsets - primarily Sony Xperia phones, but also a menagerie of handsets from the likes of HTC. PS Mobile arguably needs a big platform coup to become a serious contender. If Sony could get the platform supported on Samsung's phones (perhaps an olive branch too far) or finally get a bit of momentum behind Vita, PS Mobile could be a serious feather in the company's cap.

"Finally, we now have an actual business move from Nintendo which acknowledges that games exist on mobile devices"

More dramatic, in a sense, is Nintendo's announcement that it's going to launch tools aimed at helping smartphone developers to bring their software to the Wii U. This announcement is more important in terms of what it adds to the mood music of the industry than it is in actual commercial terms, I suspect. Lots of commentators have spent the past five years arguing either that Nintendo should or must bring its world-class IP to mobile devices, and plenty of hot air has been generated over the industry's favourite fantasy football pairing of Apple and Nintendo, regardless of the extraordinary cultural clash such a combination would inevitably engender. Through all of this, Nintendo maintained a stoic silence about the import of the mobile space, broken only by Satoru Iwata's occasional acknowledgement of new competition for gamers' attention - acknowledgement that may have gained a slightly wry edge when the 3DS started confounding everyone by outperforming its world-beating predecessor, at least in Japan (which is also a seriously big market for mobile games).

Finally, we now have an actual business move from Nintendo which acknowledges that games exist on mobile devices, and not just Pokemon companion applications. Yet it's precisely the opposite of what the world has insisted the company must do. Far from putting Nintendo games on iOS or Android, Nintendo is inviting developers on those platforms to come and bring their games to Wii U. Apple market commentator John Gruber describes this as Nintendo being "on the right road, but driving in the wrong direction". I take his point, and I'm not even sure I entirely disagree (although I certainly don't entirely agree either) - but I couldn't help but laugh at the sheer brass neck of Nintendo's move.

With both Nintendo's outreach to bring smartphone games to the Wii U and Sony's PlayStation Mobile platform, I can't help but feel that there's a strong element of PR involved. Not PR aimed at consumers, but PR aimed squarely at developers - small studios in particular, people who have come to see mobile phones as the natural home for their software while regarding Nintendo and Sony's platforms as being closed-up gardens, tucked away behind high walls that can only be scaled by multinational publishers and other such deep-pocketed types. We've seen with the tone and pitch of Sony's PlayStation 4 announcements how important it considers it to be to get support from grassroots developers as well as sewing up a steady stream of AAA titles. PlayStation Mobile as an early shot in that war - and to the surprise of many, it looks like Nintendo may now be willing to court the same market.

"The real objective is something else - it's a way to show developers that the gates to console development are standing open in a way they never really were before"

So is this a "fight back" against the rise of mobile? Not really, no. The reality is that even if GungHo's Puzzle & Dragons is making millions of dollars a day on mobile (it's the most embarrassingly addictive mobile game I've ever played, for the record, and while I have yet to give it a single Yen of my hard-earned after a month of play, I won't regret doing so down the line), its presence on the Wii U still wouldn't be a system seller, or even a terribly big commercial success, most likely. Much of the coverage of Nintendo's announcement has been focused on the idea of existing mobile titles being launched on Wii U, just as early coverage of PlayStation Mobile pitched it alternately as a way to bring PSone classics to mobile phones and a way to bring mobile phone games to Vita. In both cases, the real objective is something else - it's a way to show developers that the gates to console development are standing open in a way they never really were before.

For Sony, the realisation of the increasingly distributed nature of game development - which was once centralised in a tiny number of publishers and a slightly less tiny number of expensively-run studios - took a tough hardware generation and a fair bit of internal struggle. For Nintendo, I suspect that it runs even more counter to the firm's internal philosophy, and I would not be hugely optimistic about the company's chances of building a really welcoming platform for the wider development community. All the same, a firm doesn't stay in business for over a century without becoming pretty good at moving with the wind when the times require it. First for Sony and now for Nintendo, the strategy for dealing with the influx of mobile is not to surrender - it's to be about figuring out how to co-exist in the industry's new reality.

Related stories

Nintendo's eShop refund policy found to violate European consumer rights

Norwegian Consumer Council asks Nintendo to bring its policy in line with European law

By Matthew Handrahan

Fire Emblem Heroes generates five times more revenue in its first year than Super Mario Run

Nintendo's third mobile game grosses $295 million in year-one, but falls well short of Pokémon Go

By Haydn Taylor

Latest comments (6)

Christopher Bowen Editor in Chief, Gaming Bus4 years ago
Can a mobile developer possibly answer why they'd want to deal with a middle man who has historically never been totally receptive to treating their third parties well? I don't blame people for going past Nintendo, Sony or Microsoft at this point, even if I believe dealing with Google or Apple will prove no better.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Christopher Bowen on 10th May 2013 8:55am

1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
James Barnard Founder / Developer, Springloaded4 years ago
I personally love making games on console, and who would want to turn down another potential avenue for profit? The thing that’s off is that I went to the Nintendo website the other day, and started looking at the “become a registered developer” stuff. It’s really heavy going, many small indie developers don’t have registered business addresses, and the first thing you see is “what is your business address, registered business number” etc etc. Looking at this, and knowing that even if they do accept me, I will have to pay several thousand dollars for a dev kit just made me back away. It’s a shame because I’d love to do it…they need to be less threatening, and have an open developer registration area. PSM is great, but why is PSM separate from the normal store, it’s a shame to be splitting things up like that, the new indie section won’t benefit me as a PSM developer…they need to make their retail devices into dev kits, and allow people to develop however they want to. Obviously looking at apple, the whole staff picks thing allows them to cherry pick their favourite content and leave the bad stuff to languish in obscurity.
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Adam Campbell Game Production Manager, Azoomee4 years ago
If that's the case Chris and Google and Apple will prove no better, then why not take a chance and extend your reach to Nintendo & Sony, seeing as they're seemingly offering help and support with open arms? In the same position I would love to see my top mobile games release on those platforms.
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (6)
Christopher Thigpen Lead Producer, Kiz Studios4 years ago

Awareness. Life Extension of your product. etc....
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Yiannis Koumoutzelis Founder & Creative Director, Neriad Games4 years ago
As a huge Nintendo fan, I think very positively towards taking my next game to WiiU or 3DS.

But as a small studio, that just started i say it really depends on Nintendo.
An open invitation is not enough. There are open invitations all over the place.

1. I have yet to see all this bureaucracy disappearing.
2. A way for developing games without having to spend money on their devkit.
3. A better shopping experience. Everything is crammed in there. The shop, especially on 3DS feels "claustrophobic" and is slow!!

Until at least 2 of the above are resolved, i can't say with certainty that i am ready to make that step!
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Sandy Lobban Founder, Noise Me Up4 years ago
Until you can download the tools for free and use the retail device as a devkit, it's simply not going to happen. Both companies are light years behind in this area.
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.