EA, Microsoft, Zynga join opposition of Defence of Marriage Act

Publishers sign amicus brief in opposition to proposed law against same-sex marriages

Electronic Arts, Microsoft and Zynga have joined dozens of American companies in opposition to the Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA).

In broad terms, DOMA is a proposed federal law that defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman, so that no state or sub-division of the United States would be required to recognise a same-sex marriage granted by another state. This would extend to federal matters like insurance, social security and joint tax returns.

The companies have signed an amicus brief that asks the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to declare aspects of the act unconstitutional.

"DOMA presents a number of problems for businesses like EA, as it creates regulatory, tax, and discrimination complications for employers, and that's why we're standing against it," EA said in a statement.

"The underlying lawsuit impacts all employers no matter how big or small, and no matter the industry, and we encourage other business to join these efforts."

More stories

Would losing the FIFA name hurt EA? | Opinion

Common sense should prevail, but there's more to the FIFA game series than the brand

By Christopher Dring

EA: Publishers have a responsibility to demystify video games for parents

Samantha Ebelthite discusses EA's awareness campaign with Internet Matters and her new role as vice chair of UKIE

By James Batchelor

Latest comments (6)

Todd Hooper CEO, Zipline games9 years ago
FYI, DOMA is not a proposed Federal law. It was enacted in 1996. The case mentioned which EA et al is supporting is a challenge to DOMA in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Brian Perry Studying Master Science Game Design, Full Sail University9 years ago
Like Todd said, DOMA isn't a proposed law. Its already law. Homosexual activists want to change the already present law. You should correct your article.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Jack Lee9 years ago
I would prefer the term "homosexual rights activists," personally, Brian. I am neither gay nor a member of the gay community, but I staunchly support the challenge to DOMA. Just saying. You don't have to be part of the rumored gay agenda to support equality and the dismantling of state-enforced bigotry.
1Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (6)
Nicholas Pantazis Senior Editor, VGChartz Ltd9 years ago
Every time I hear "gay agenda" I now think of this excellent Ted talk
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Bruce Everiss Marketing Consultant 9 years ago
Any marriage law is the state interfering in other people's lives.
If I want to marry a set of male twins AND a set of female twins then what business is that of the state?
Or of the religious do-gooders who try and force their views onto everyone else.
Bigots everywhere.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Alfonso Sexto Lead Tester, Ubisoft Germany9 years ago
If I liked the idea of the state getting directly in the middle of people's life, I would move to Iran or China. If I have a homosexual son the State is in no right to tell him if he can marry or not.

Here in Europe Spain, Germany, Netherlands, France and some others have accepted gay marriage and I don't see the ideal family and church collapsing all around me. But I guess some of the anti-gay marriage would not waste time in blaming gay marriage for the Euro Crisis. We should pretty much call it "Gay Crisis" if that is the case lol
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.