Find out how to kick start your games industry career

Get Your Free Ticket Today

Epic v. Silicon Knights: Jury finds for Epic on all counts

Tweet from Epic VP Mark Rein says it's over [UPDATE: Judge awards Epic $4.5m]

Update: Details are still trickling in, but according to a source close to the case speaking to The Escapist, a judge has awarded Epic Games $4.5 million in damages in its countersuit against Silicon Knights. The situation does not look good for the Canadian developer, which now owes far more than its already large legal fees. We've contacted Silicon Knights boss Denis Dyack for reaction, but have yet to hear back.

Original story:

The five-year long battle between Silicon Knights and Epic is over, according to a tweet from Epic VP Mark Rein: "Case over. Jury finds for Epic on all counts."

Silicon Knights sought $58 million in damages over problems with Epic's support for the Unreal Engine 3 during development of Silicon Kinght's Too Human game. The case was essentially mooted a few weeks ago, when the judge decided that Silicon Knight's damages claims were only worth $1 each.

There's no word yet on whether Silicon Knights might appeal. At least for the moment, this trial appears to be finished.

Find out how to kick start your games industry career

Get Your Free Ticket Today

More stories

Epic welcomes blockchain and NFT games as Steam bans them

But firm says titles will need to comply with financial laws and make it clear how blockchain is used, with more rules to follow

By James Batchelor

Google countersues Epic Games for breach of contract

The tech giant argues that "Epic's purported launch on Google Play was an act of deception designed to provoke litigation"

By Marie Dealessandri

Latest comments (5)

David Radd Senior Editor, IndustryGamers9 years ago
The only reason I can think that Silicon Knights would not appeal is that they can't afford another legal joust like this. Considering the recent contraction of the company, losing this case could be devastating.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Peter Dwyer Games Designer/Developer 9 years ago
It's sad that we only wanted Epic to loose so that we could legitimately say "Epic fail"
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Thomas Dolby Project Manager / Lead Programmer, Ai Solve9 years ago
I wanted Epic to lose because they managed to stop key testimonies and evidence from surfacing in the trial. I don't know the full story behind either, so I don't know if Silicon Knights were right to take the case forward in the first place, but when they have key witnesses barred from court and then have their claims practically thrown out because of lack of evidence it's pure injustice.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (5)
Patrick Frost QA Project Monitor 9 years ago
Thomas, from what I have read, that particular witness was going to make claims that were unsubstantiated.

Them being barred from the court would have been a carefully decided move by the court, not Epic. It would not have been allowed to happen without full investigations being made and a decision that the testimony would have been invalid.

I much prefer the version of justice where people who make up figures and facts are not allowed to testify.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
David Radd Senior Editor, IndustryGamers9 years ago
Any lawyer worth his salt tries to get things dismissed, that's just part of the legal process. I will say thought that if certain evidence has been disallowed and it was an important pillar of SK's argument, that could keep them from filing another suit because they may no longer have a solid argument - clearly the jury thought so in this case.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.