Critical Consensus: Journey

Break out the thesaurus - thatgamecompany's latest will put your critical vocabulary to the test

Video game critics live to regret their reviews of games like Journey. Indeed, thatgamecompany's releases to date seems custom-built to lead the press down endless, winding avenues of purple prose: deliberately minimalist and aesthetically beautiful, flOw and Flower left acres of room for players to project their thoughts and feelings on the experience. The problem critics face is how to project those thoughts and feelings onto the page in a way that serves their readers rather than their own need to let the adjectives fly.

Joystiq's Jordan Mallory starts his five-star review with the definition of an adjective: awesome; a word, he argues, that is misused so often in the modern world that its true meaning has been lost. Fortunately, is at hand to offer some clarity: "an overwhelming feeling of reverence, admiration, fear, etc., produced by that which is grand, sublime, extremely powerful, or the like."

"Nowadays, 'awesome' functions as a synonym for 'cool' or 'impressive'. When someone says a game is awesome, they're really saying that it's great, and generally are not implying any existential or emotional significance beyond that."

"I bring this up, because I don't want to be misconstrued as generic or uninspired when I say that Journey is an awesome game. In the most classical, archaic sense of the word, Journey is a beautiful, evocative and unequivocally transcendental experience."

So Journey is pretty good, then, and its current Metacritic average of 92 suggests that almost the entire gaming world feels basically the same way. That includes Eurogamer's Christian Donlan, who is open in his admiration for the way thatgamecompany implements classic design techniques with style and originality.

If Journey is mesmeric on your own, it's a revelation with a partner. These vast expanses are much easier to traverse with two

Chris Schilling, Videogamer

"That glowing mountain on the horizon is a case in point," he says in his 9 out of 10 review. "It seems like a straight lift from the Old Testament at first, but in Journey it's also your ultimate objective. It's both goal and waypoint marker, far less artificial than the breadcrumb trails of Perfect Dark Zero or Fable 2, but no less effective when it comes to the simple, crucial things that a game has to do - like keeping its players oriented as they move through large, artfully empty environments."

"Or check out the scarf that billows and flaps around your devout and pin-legged avatar as you lean into the wind. It's part of a distinctive moth-brown uniform that comes teasingly close to referencing religious garb as varied as the burqa or a Franciscan's habit, but it's also there to tell you how much magical energy you have left for jumping and floating."

"It's a piece of standard UI, essentially, yet it's stuck right into the game world, tracing pretty little spirals in the desert air as form and function merge."

Donlan touches on crucial aspects of thatgamescompany's work. Flower and flOw may have been zen-like counterpoints to the sturm und drang of the average video game, but they also adhered closely to classic tropes. In Flower you had to collect items to access the next area, while flOw played like Pacman in the Primordial Soup. Their originality lay in the execution more than the ideas; thatgamecompany's brilliance lies in its understanding of where to let the player fill in the gaps, and the powerful impressions that a lack of authored elements can elicit.

"The storyline leaves much to your own interpretation: you wake, alone, in the desert, and must then head towards a glowing peak in the distance.," Donlan continues. "Everything beyond that is what you make of it. Yet the game's mechanics waste no time at all explaining exactly what you should be doing from one moment to the next."

"Journey has room for physics challenges, stealth sections, and even some gentle levelling up as you collect tokens that allow you to hover in the air for longer periods of time. But it does all of this with an unusual economy of control - you're basically limited to move, jump, float and, um, sing."

Journey is a resolutely linear game in which your range of interactions is minimal. For some, that will make it a pretty but hollow novelty

Edge magazine

Journey's singing mechanic exists as a means of communication between players, but, true to form, thatgamecompany's implementation of multiplayer is unique. There are no separate modes, no challenges specifically designed for two, but every now and then the game will allow your journey to overlap with that of another player. You will spot them somewhere on that vast horizon; their companionship is entirely optional, but Videogamer's Chris Schilling describes the impact as akin to having "two games in one."

"If Journey is mesmeric on your own, it's a revelation with a partner," says Schilling, who also awards the game 9 out of 10. "That early reticence to engage will dissolve as you realise that these vast expanses are much easier to traverse with two. A jab of the circle button from either player sends out a noise that sparks the other's inner powers, and instead of trudging slowly across hilly dunes, you'll glide over them."

"In an arena dominated by conflict, it's an astonishing achievement to imbue players with the desire to co-operate. And not just to co-operate, but to co-habit, to share this bizarre, beautiful experience... Alone, you feel lost, fragile; together, you're empowered. You may have experienced similar in the silent but unbreakable bond of friendship found in Ico. But never quite like this, never with another player."

Edge magazine is less kind with with its score, though you'll have to read through 8 paragraphs of glowing praise before you find any negativity. Like so many others, the Edge hive-mind is full of admiration for the sparse beauty of the art direction, the ingenious subtlety of the level design, and the powerful effect of making your way with a partner in tow.

But this is Edge, and the score is 8 out of 10, so there must be flaws, even if they are described as little more than "niggles."

"The presence of collectible glyphs and hidden tapestries add a faint collect 'em all mentality to a game that's better without them - Journey's environments feel like they're designed to pass by in a dreamlike haze, not to be scoured for content. And some players will bemoan its relative brevity, coupled with the lack of incentive the game gives them to return. The problem with building a game around the magic of discovery is that it's a one-time enchantment."

"But Journey's real issue, if it has one, goes much deeper than that. It's a resolutely linear game in which your range of interactions is minimal. For some, that will make it a pretty but hollow novelty; boring, perhaps. But for those who play games to explore strange lands, see beautiful sights and to immerse themselves - for however brief a time - in a new world, Journey is perfect. And what's more, they'll find someone like them to share it with."

Related stories

"It's the game designer's job to evoke different sides of humanity"

Thatgamecompany president Jenova Chen believes that positive behavior can be rewarded and monetized

By James Brightman

Thatgamecompany considering move to a multi-project studio

Studio manager Sunni Pavlovic says Journey outfit could run two teams after wrapping work on current game

By Brendan Sinclair

Latest comments (8)

I think, we all could do with a small pocket of magic, wonderment and a mind free of cynical modern constraints. Journey delivers it with beauty in one small cupful of desert sand.

More please!
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
David Radd Senior Editor, IndustryGamers6 years ago
If most reviewers were struggling for the words of praise, sounds like Edge was struggling for words of criticism!
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Roland Austinat roland austinat media productions|consulting, IDG, Computec, Spiegel Online6 years ago
"Edge magazine is less kind with its score (...) 8 out of 10."

You do know that Edge has not bowed to the "8/10 is the new 5/10" mantra? Edge's average is actually 5/10 and someone who loves a genre could and should investigate a 6/10, too. Something that would be utterly bad in any other magazine.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (8)
Matthew Handrahan European Deputy Editor, GamesIndustry.biz6 years ago
Hi Roland. Yes, I'm certainly aware of that, having worked on its main rival, which had the same scoring policy, for many years. The quote you mention is intended as a statement of fact rather than an assessment of the review's accuracy or worth - a conversational way of saying that an 8 is lower than a 9 or a 10.

That said, do read Edge's full review. It actually calls the game "perfect" and suggests that it may have no significant flaws at all. Its only critcisims seem to be made on the assumed tastes of other people. I find the sentiment that "some will feel the game is too short" to be disingenous in context, given that the reviewer doesn't seem to agree with that assessment as an individual.

But that's a very different and very thorny issue.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Matthew Handrahan on 14th March 2012 10:14am

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
David Radd Senior Editor, IndustryGamers6 years ago
That's an excellent point Matt, and I think it's one of the major fallacies of game reviewers is that they're trying to presume the opinions of a theoretical person that may not exist. For me personally, I'm a grown up and I can make my own decisions - if I'm reading a review, I want to hear someone else's opinion and make up my own mind, not have that reviewer try to guess what my disposition is.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Greg Wilcox Creator, Destroy All Fanboys! 6 years ago
As a reviewer, I dislike when writers fall back on assuming readers who might just WANT to be turned on to a new game WON'T like it for reasons the writer comes up with, then uses to generate the final score.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Private Industry 6 years ago
I was doing reviews for several years and I have to agree with Greg, you cant assume what other people like. And when it comes to game length you just put there the hard facts aka "to finish the game it takes around x amount of hours" and people will decide for themself if it`s worth it or not. Reviews are there to educate people on how the game is, how the gameplay is and what not and obviously since reviwers are humans the rating needs to take into account what the reviewer likes and not what he/she asumes others will like.

From Edge:
"Journey's real issue, if it has one, goes much deeper than that. It's a resolutely linear game in which your range of interactions is minimal. For some, that will make it a pretty but hollow novelty; boring, perhaps. But for those who play games to explore strange lands, see beautiful sights and to immerse themselves for however brief a time in a new world, Journey is perfect."

Aka because some people might perhaps not like a certain aspect but I enjoyed the hell out of it I will give it a lower rating. I don`t agree with with Edge since a long time ago for a lot of reviews. We talk here about the people who gave God of War 2 and Fallout 3 a 7/10 and Zone of the Enders 2 a 4/10 among other questionable scores.

I find a lot of reviews in general nowadays questionable, the other day I was reading a review of a bigger website for ME3 where they actually complained that you don`t have anymore to waste your time scanning planets for a half an hour to get the minerals *facepalm*

Anyway Journey is awesome and for the price it costs there is no problem at all with the length of the game :)
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Matthew Handrahan European Deputy Editor, GamesIndustry.biz6 years ago
Don't forget the 5/10 for Dragon Age: Origins! :)

Joking aside, I totally agree. This is my own opinion, and isn't related to the article above, but I take issue with Edge's comment that Journey could be considered boring, only a sentence before the reviewer also calls it perfect. It's a confusing sentiment, particularly for a publication like Edge, which I would expect to avoid hedging its bets and have a little more confidence in its own opinions.

Edited 2 times. Last edit by Matthew Handrahan on 15th March 2012 2:14pm

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.