SOPA and PIPA co-sponsors withdraw support

Missouri, Utah and Florida senators reverse stance in the face of widespread protests

A number of US politicians have retracted their support of the controversial SOPA and PIPA anti-piracy laws following a series of online protests from major web companies.

Senators Marco Rubio (Florida) and Roy Blunt (Missouri), who were initially co-sponsors of the Protect IP Act (PIPA), both issued statements on Facebook yesterday reversing their positions.

"I have a strong interest in stopping online piracy that costs Florida jobs," Rubio said. "However, we must do this while simultaneously promoting an open, dynamic internet environment that is ripe for innovation and promotes new technologies."

"Therefore, I have decided to withdraw my support for the Protect IP Act. Furthermore, I encourage Senator [Harry] Reid to abandon his plan to rush the bill to the floor."

Senator Blunt criticised PIPA as "deeply flawed" and in need of "much work" before it is acceptable. However, Blunt stressed that he still supported the issues raised by the legislation.

"The right to free speech is one of the most basic foundations that makes our nation great, and I strongly oppose sanctioning Americans' right to free speech in any medium - including over the internet," he said.

"I continue to believe that we can come to a solution that will cut off the revenue sources for foreign websites dedicated to counterfeiting and piracy that steal American jobs, hurt the economy, and harm consumers."

Utah senator Orrin Hatch also withdrew his co-sponsorship, calling PIPA "simply not ready for primetime" and confirming that he will vote against the legislation when it passes before the Senate next week.

"Given the legitimate vocal concerns, it is imperative that we take a step back to allow everyone to come together and find a reasonable solution," he said.

Rubio, Blunt and Hatch were among 13 members of the senate who altered their position on SOPA and PIPA yesterday - 11 Republicans and 2 Democrats.

SOPA and PIPA have been widely criticised by gaming and technology companies on the grounds that, should they be passed, their consequences could ultimately prove damaging to the very people they were designed to protect.

Yesterday, Reddit and Wikipedia were among a number of sites that went offline in protest. Google censored its homepage logo to raise awareness of the issue, and collected more than 4.5 million signatures on its anti-SOPA petition.

Related stories

Hawaii proposes landmark legislation against loot boxes

UPDATE: State representative who previously declared legislation a "slippery slope" affirms support for efforts toward regulating loot boxes; expects more states to follow Hawaii's lead

By Haydn Taylor

South Australian Game Development Fund now open

Production, development, and marketing grants now available as part of state government's AU $2 million investment fund

By Haydn Taylor

Latest comments (4)

Justin Biddle Software Developer 6 years ago
Tide is turning. Thank goodness.

I do object to the SOPA sponsors trying to paint protest sites like wikipedia and the like of twisting the bill and giving a false impression of the bill. I've read the contents of the bill and what it entails myself and formed my own conclusions (and PIPA). I've also read the arguments both for and against. I object to being painted as an idiot who believes only what one side says and not reading an objective overview of the matter in question or listening to opposing people's opinions.

Edited 3 times. Last edit by Justin Biddle on 19th January 2012 11:53am

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
John Donnelly Quality Assurance 6 years ago
Power to the people.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
robert troughton Managing Director, Coconut Lizard6 years ago
Blunt had to withdraw, really, after breaking the act by using (without acknowledgement) someone's photo as his Twitter background:-

[link url=
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (4)
Tony Johns6 years ago
People of America.

At this years federal election, only YOU would be able to stop these politicians as well as any other future industry or politician fools from trying to screw over the internet even if they try to use the excuse of trying to stop online piracy or god forbid, those politicians who deliberately try to break the first amendment all because of them wanting to 'protect the children'


Because it is an election year, don't expect these politicians to keep their words when they get voted in for another 2 or 4 years. They can easily betray you if you allow them back in.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.