Maroon 5 singer sues Activision

Adam Levine unhappy with his role in Band Hero

Maroon 5 front man Adam Levine is suing Activision over his the use of his likeness in music game Band Hero.

The singer alleged that while he performed both the hit song She Will Be Loved and provided motion capture for the game, he was not aware he avatar could be used to perform other musician's tracks.

Levine also claimed that he received a lower fee than other Band Hero artists.

According to The Wrap, Levine is seeking damages for breach of contract, fraudulent inducement, violation of the common-law right of publicity, and unfair business acts or practices.

Activision has so far failed to comment on the lawsuit.

Last year No Doubt filed a similar lawsuit against Activision over Band Hero.

Related stories

NFL and NBA veterans among key hires at Activision Blizzard's new esports division

"We're committed to maintaining the highest degree of excellence and professionalism in our operation," says esports division CEO

By Haydn Taylor

Call of Duty goes early to avoid Red Dead clash

Activision releasing Black Ops 4 a full month earlier than usual as Rockstar's next is set to dominate Q4 - but will others follow?

By James Batchelor

Latest comments (8)

Andrew Goodchild Studying development, Train2Game6 years ago
Now whether he was mislead into thinking he would only be performing his own song, that is an issue. This should have been laid out in a contract clearly, I'm guessing it perhaps wasn't clear enough not to leave room for interpretation.

However, "Levine also claimed that he received a lower fee than other Band Hero artists."

Well as long as he was paid the figure he or his agent on his behalf agreed to, it's irrelevent. If people got paid more it's because they either a) were seen as a bigger draw or b) had an agent who was better at negotiating price. So for that one blame your agent, the money was obviously enough for the appearence (or at least allowing for the other part, what he thought the appearence was) before he found out what others were on, and frankly, I'd expect some artists to command a higher fee due to demand, profile and brand.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Andrew Goodchild on 5th August 2011 11:51am

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Tommy Thompson Studying Artificial Intelligence (PhD), University of Strathclyde6 years ago
A bit late isn't he? Band Hero came out 2 years ago right?

I agree with Andrew, it's only whether it was indicated the avatar would perform other artists songs that is an issue.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Rick Lopez Illustrator, Graphic Designer 6 years ago
Its easy to understand why the gaming industry stopped making music games. You know what it is, as the developer to wake up every morning to have one of these spoiled brats up your ass demanding more money. The music gaming genere probably gave these musicians more publicity and exposure then ever. Especially to kids who werent even born or raised listening to their music. As a developer Id say "Screw music games!" So much legal crap behind it, it really is not worth it.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Rick Lopez on 5th August 2011 1:33pm

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (8)
Aleksi Ranta Category Management Project Manager 6 years ago
Mo money, mo problems...
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Pelle Lundborg CEO, GAME Sweden6 years ago
All music content licensing deals comes under even the small unknown bands on a compilation get the same fee as the big boys...not that MFN was ever invented to use as a price fixing instrument, but rather to deal with international trade between nations...
Anyway, I am 100% sure he has a MFN clause in his contract, and if it hasnt been respected, he has the right to get the same as the best paid other contracted artist/band on the same product...
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Kevin Patterson musician 6 years ago
As a musician, I was disgusted to see Kurt Cobain singing Play that funky music in Guitar hero. Maybe Kurt would laughed, we will never know, but i thought it was disrespectful. I can understand not liking having your image available to perform songs that are way different than your style. I can't imagine them doing this to Danzig lol.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Andrew Goodchild Studying development, Train2Game6 years ago
@Andrew McFain re."learn to read a contract"

I would assume it's not that simple. If these things were explicitly detailed in contract, surely they wouldn't have much of a case to begin with?
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Alex Bunch Proof Reader, ZiCorp Studios6 years ago
Always seems to be the artists heading towards the dumper (copyright Smash Hits 1985) that sue.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.