Lodsys sues seven App Store devs over patents

Company begins legal action after cease and desist from Apple fails to impress

Lodsys, the patent licensing company which threatened to sue several App Store developers over supposed patent infringements has followed through on that warning, initiating seven legal cases against developers despite receiving a very public cease and desist letter from Apple last month.

The issue stem from two patents relating to apps which allow the user to purchase an upgrade or full program internally from a demo or partial app. Those two patents are entirely valid, and owned by Lodsys, but last month apple backed developers by stating that the licensing agreement it has with Lodsys over the patents covers all of its customers and business partners too.

Lodsys disputes this claim and, on Tuesday, launched seven legal cases in East Texas against five US developers and two from overseas. At least one Android title is also covered in the litigation, but so far Google have not become publicly involved.

"On May 22nd, Apple's chief lawyer Bruce Sewell unequivocally announced that Apple's license to the Lodsys patents gave Apple's 3rd party developers complete and 'indisputable' freedom to use the covered inventions without paying royalties or fearing lawsuits," reads a post on the Lodsys blog.

"There was a very positive reaction in the press and blogs. Apple appeared to give the Developer community what they wanted. Unfortunately for Developers, Apple's claim of infallibility has no discernible basis in law or fact.

"The letter was very surprising as Apple and Lodsys were in confidential discussions and there was clearly disagreement on the interpretation of the license terms of Apple's agreement. Before, during and after these interactions, Lodsys has carefully considered this issue and consulted several legal experts to consider Apple's claims," continues the post.

"We stand firm and restate our previous position that it is the 3rd party Developers that are responsible for the infringement of Lodsys' patents and they are responsible for securing the rights for their applications. Developers relying on Apple's letter do so to their own detriment and are strongly urged to review Apple's own developer agreements to determine the true extent of Apple's responsibilities to them.

"In a private communication, simultaneous to this posting, Lodsys has sent a detailed legal position on the license interpretation issue, in writing to Apple that has been previously only verbally communicated. Apple has our permission to publish that letter, in its entirety, should developers wish to review our dispute and evaluate the risks with their own counsel. While we have nothing to hide, we cannot unilaterally publish the letter because it refers to information that was obtained with an obligation of confidentiality to Apple and we do not have their permission to do so."

The details of the companies covered by the cases were not made public by either party, but legal blog Foss Patents obtained and published the names of the following seven studios: Combay, Inc. of Roanoke, Texas; Iconfactory, Inc. of Greensboro, North Carolina; Illusion Labs AB of Malmö, Sweden; Shovelmate of Las Vegas, Nevada; Quickoffice, Inc. of Plano, Texas; Richard Shinderman of Brooklyn, New York and Wulven Games of Hanoi, Vietnam.

Lodsys had previously demanded 0.575 per cent of the US revenues of all affected companies, which may well eventually extend beyond those already named. The company is now suing for damages and reparations, counting any continued use of unlicensed patents after its initial complaint as willful infringement - an offence which could triple the cost of settlement.

Patent litigation can be a tremendously expensive business in the US and the seven developers will no doubt be hoping that Apple's previous solidarity translates into legal backing or compensation - a position which Lodsys likely shares given the relative ease of suing one large, rich company over several smaller ones.

As a sign of how convinced it is of the strength of its case, Lodsys has promised to pay an extra $1000 to any company which it sues over the issue and loses against.

Related stories

Apple TV: Limitation or Opportunity?

Graham McAllister sees a bright future for Apple's latest amalgamation of ideas

By Graham McAllister

Threes & Monument Valley named GOTY by Apple

Official rewards for two premium titles

By Dan Pearson

Latest comments (5)

James Prendergast Research Chemist 6 years ago
Wouldn't it be something if every app developer pulled all of their apps from the app store on the same day in a show of force to apple?

I think that would be a pretty strong statement to apple and its source of income.

Also.... i'm not sure how this patent can be valid... or does it only apply to mobile devices? Though god only knows why they'd be an exception for them as upgrading to "full" versions has been around in the desktop market for many years and the principle was logically derived from the whole shareware boom where you paid and then got the unlock code...etc etc.... Unless there's been this huge payment scheme for allowing people to upgrade from demos on the PC front that i've never heard of before?
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Eliot Lloyd Studying Computer Games Design and Production, Northumbria University6 years ago
Except that Apple are kind of defending the developers here. So it'd be stupid to withdraw support for them just as Apple has their backs for once.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Graheme Wilson producer 6 years ago
Makes me nostalgic for the days when software developers actually shared information. Then the lawyers smelt money and became interested.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Graheme Wilson on 2nd June 2011 10:37pm

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (5)
James Prendergast Research Chemist 6 years ago
@Eliot Lloyd. I'm not seeing much of a defense yet from them... Apple has communicated with Lodsys about their contract. Lodsys has disagreed with Apple over the terms and conditions. Apple aren't even involved with any of the lawsuits yet and Lodsys isn't suing them. There's no defense until they actually get into the pool and start swimming around.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Rafael Brown Lead Designer, id software6 years ago
@James, would you like Steve Jobs to personally walk over to your house and explain what his legal team is doing? Legal issues between companies take time and move at a different rate from weblog articles that need to fill daily impressions. How could Apple be involved in the lawsuits? They were _just_ announced. Apple has taken a clear legal stance, and are in talks with Lodsys, let them move at the pace their legal depts will allow.

And "wouldn't it be something if every app developer pulled our apps from Apple at the same time?' (paraphrasing) First off you realize that's hundreds of thousands of developers, when you count all the one and two man show garage devs. You may as well ask that that everyone in the world jump up in the air at the same time to see if it changes Earth's orbit.

And that's just a silly idea, Apple has been fairly good in fostering one of the most thriving and active indie dev scened in recent years. Before you condemn them, maybe you should do your homework. You act as if Apple is in cahoots with Lodsys.

@ Graheme, yes patent litigation in technology has become a disturbing field in the last 20 or so odd years. I do have to wonder how in-app purchases in this patent are all that different from what id did with Doom shareware 17 or so years ago. Seems like their should be plenty of examples of prior art for the lawyers to fight over.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.