Three former Realtime Worlds directors linked to MyWorld buyout

Hetherington, Chung and Weller appointed to board of Kimble Operations

Documents obtained by reveal that three former directors of Realtime Worlds have established a new company linked to the purchase of PC game MyWorld.

Industry veteran Ian Hetherington, venture capitalist Patrick Chung and financier Harry Weller were all on the board at the development studio behind PC flop APB - and are now named as directors of Kimble Operations.

A new report by Gamasutra seemingly confirms earlier suggestions that Kimble Operations has bought MyWorld - a second title in development at Realtime before it closed - keeping on just over 20 staff to complete the project for release next year.

Kimble Operations - originally known as Newincco - was formed in late July this year, just a month after the troubled launch of APB, by legal experts at law firm Olswang LLP.

After changing its name in September, Olswang's Chris Mackie stepped down from the board as Hetherington, Chung and Weller were named as directors just weeks later.

Realtime Worlds went into administration in August, with the studio's collapse leading to the axing of APB after only a short time on the market, and multiple job losses at the Dundee firm.

More stories

What the LG vs Sony lawsuit means for you

The possible repercussions of the PS3 ban

By GamesIndustry International

APB's Second Life

GamersFirst's CCO talks why, how and when for the APB relaunch

By Alec Meer

Latest comments (11)

Fran Mulhern , Recruit3D11 years ago
There really shouldn't be any surprise here, this kind of thing happens all the time - company goes under owing money, senior management/owners set up new company and buy the old company's assets. Whether it should be ALLOWED to happen is another thing, but it does.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Nick McCrea Gentleman, Pocket Starship11 years ago
I have mixed feelings about this kind of thing.

Protecting company directors and owners from some of the consequences of a failed company via limited liability is an imperative in creating the kind of environment where people feel able to take calculated risks with their money. If you have some kind of post-administration penalty or restrictions on former company officers, there just might be negative consequences for subsequent job creation.

On the other hand, you can easily envisage a situation where perverse incentives come into play - it's clear the company is going down, company directors may be able to save it by inviting others in or selling at some cost to themselves (diluted shareholding, reduced power etc), but of course have the alternative of letting everything fall apart then picking up the juicy bits for cheap.

I wonder if there is a jurisdiction somewhere that's attempted to resolve this kind of issue.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Martyn Brown Managing Director, Insight For Hire11 years ago
This happens in all walks of business life, look at football clubs for a start. However, that's not to suggest it's acceptable and you have to feel for the people hurt in all this when they read such headlines.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (11)
Stewart Gilray Managing Director, Just Add Water11 years ago
It also shows belief from Hetherington and Co. in MyWorld, something they obviously didn't have in APB.

Hetherington has been synonymous with the UK industry since the early/mid 80s, I for one have a lot of time for Ian, and have done since the Psygnosis days, so I say, good on them, and get the bloody title done and out.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Fran Mulhern , Recruit3D11 years ago - this is where a "like" button would be useful, a la Facebook.

What Stewart said.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
John Bye Lead Designer, Freejam11 years ago
The fact that the new company was setup after the board members knew their old company was probably going to be in trouble but before it actually hit the rocks does make it sound a tad dodgy, especially if (as the story suggests) the new company was setup as an off-the-shelf shell by a law firm acting on their behalf and they only joined it later on to hoover up the choice bits of their former company after it had collapsed.

What leaves a bad taste in the mouth for me is that this new company was apparently setup (in late July, according to this story, presumably with exactly this function in mind) three weeks before RTW went into administration (in mid-August). Which means the board of directors of RTW already knew the writing was on the wall and were preparing for the worst, but let their company flounder on for another few weeks and then collapse in such a way that it apparently left their employees thousands of pounds out of pocket, without any salary for their final few weeks, let alone any redundancy money.

It's like if the captain of the Titanic had hopped into a lifeboat after it hit the iceberg and paddled off, while his crew kept on assuring the passengers everything was going to be fine.

I can't help feeling the responsible thing to do would have been to wind things up gracefully at the end of July, and at least be able to cover the pay roll for the month, instead of letting the company go to the wall while laying plans to fly back in and pick at its carcass after the dust had settled.

But then I'm not a company director, so maybe it's just me...

Standard Disclaimer: My opinion only, does not reflect blah blah blah.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by John Bye on 28th September 2010 5:10pm

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Interesting observation there john.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Khaled Al-Hurby on 28th September 2010 5:23pm

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Andrew Goodchild Studying development, Train2Game11 years ago
There was a quite frank blog by a staff member, working on MyWorld, about how through APB they thought big mistakes were being made, and that it looked like it would go wrong. If these guys found a way to save a project that had promise, and save 20 staff, there is a definite positive there. I'm not saying it's ideal if they handled it in a sneaky way, but 100 jobs lost and 20 saved is at least a bit better than 120 jobs.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Lee Hansiel Lim Game Developer - Unity3D, Anino PlayLab11 years ago
I wonder what the other 100 or so ex-staff members of RTW feel about this.

.. and what John said.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Andrew Richards CEO, Codeplay11 years ago
Given the new company was called Newincco, and bought from lawyers, it's probable that it was an off-the-shelf-company bought from the lawyers. i.e. the incorporation date of the company is not the point at which Hetherington and co set up the new company. The date that the directors went to the lawyers and asked for a new company is probably September, the date it had its directors appointed and name changed.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
John Bye Lead Designer, Freejam11 years ago
You could be right. The company's full name was actually Newincco 1027, it looks like Olswang has lots of them, so maybe the RTW directors just bought one off the shelf a few weeks ago and it's purely coincidental that the company was originally registered just before RTW shut down. The way the story was worded, it sounded like the company was setup on their behalf by Olswang in July, but maybe that's not the case. It would be interesting if someone could confirm the details.

If everything was above board though, apologies for jumping to conclusions.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.