Sections

Jobs' Game

Steve Jobs has finally embraced gaming as a key part of Apple's business. Nintendo and Sony should be seriously worried.

When it launched the App Store a few years ago, introducing a marketplace for new software for its iPhone and iPod Touch devices, Apple's relationship with the videogames business changed overnight. Ever since the appearance of the iPod, the company's engagement with media has been growing - turning it into a key distributor of music at first, then movies and TV shows, and most recently books and magazines.

Videogames had been the red-headed stepchild of the bunch. Apple just didn't seem to be interested in games - a disinterest that was deeply encoded in the firm's culture dating right back through the nineties, when game developers threw their hands up in frustration at the firm's unwillingness to spend time or money on turning Mac OS into a viable gaming platform.

Perhaps the problem was cultural, stemming from the ethos which saw Macs as creative tools and looked down its nose at videogames as a consequence. More likely, it was generational - the firm's decision making is incredibly focused on a small team of executives, headed up by Steve Jobs, many of whom are a little older than the "event horizon" for the first gaming generation.

Either way, there's a strange irony to the fact that Apple became a major platform holder in the gaming world without ever really wanting to. Once the numbers started to roll in, and the company realised just how much of the revenue on the App Store was coming from games, whatever cultural or generational issues had dogged gaming in its eyes would inevitably fade very quickly.

That's precisely what happened yesterday evening, when Jobs unveiled the company's new iPod line-up at an event in San Francisco. Apple may not have planned to become a gaming platform holder, and Jobs may not be a gamer, but the firm has shed all of its qualms about the medium, and has begun to embrace its position in the games business.

The statistics reeled off by Jobs weren't the really important part of the event. Yes, iOS devices are outselling Sony and Nintendo's handhelds combined on a week to week basis - that's a solid achievement, but not actually all that relevant.

Such figures are similar to the occasional claims that the PC is the world's biggest gaming platform based on PC hardware sales. Now, the PC may well be the biggest gaming platform, but PC hardware sales do little to prove that, since PCs are multipurpose devices and many of them will never be used for gaming. The same holds true for iOS devices.

What was much more important was the tone of Jobs' statements on gaming. For the first time, Apple seemed to be aggressive in its approach to the sector - directly laying down a gauntlet to Sony and Nintendo, talking up the installed base, the distribution platform, the software library and the device capabilities, all from a specifically gaming perspective.

In the past, Apple has always treated games on iOS as a slightly amusing aside, raising an eyebrow at the wacky and weird things people choose to do with their devices. Yesterday, games were serious business. Jobs has got gaming religion - he sees his firm as a gaming platform holder, and if that means taking the fight to Nintendo (a new rival) and Sony (a long-standing rival), then so be it.

Rhetoric aside, a number of concrete factors in the press conference point to this more aggressive approach to the gaming sector. First, of course, there's GameCenter, the company's stab at an Xbox Live/PSN style service, which allows users to maintain friend lists, compare scores and achievements and invite friends to multi-player games - as well as providing a game matchmaking service. It is, bluntly, a much better service than anything Nintendo or Sony offer on their handhelds, and a fairly clear challenge to them.

Secondly, and equally importantly, there was the unexpected unveiling of an Epic Games title for iOS, a graphically stunning game which was demoed by walking around a medieval citadel and then taking part in a bout of swordfighting. A free demo of the engine, titled Epic Citadel, was later placed on the App Store for everyone to try.

For most people, the important part of this demo was simply how incredibly good the game looks - with graphical quality which was more like the present generation of HD consoles than like a handheld. It's apparent that Apple's conversion to gaming has not happened overnight - services like GameCenter are the result of a lot of work over many months, and Epic Citadel shows that 3D gaming was a central consideration for Apple in the hardware design of its recent devices.

The promise of console-quality gaming on a handheld device is a major lure, although the majority of iOS games will almost certainly remain in 2D - titles such as Words With Friends and Angry Birds aren't the platform's top sellers because that's all it's capable of, they're successful because they're excellent uses of the platform's capabilities and fit well with how people use the devices. Even so, an RPG or adventure game set in a world as gorgeous as that of Epic Citadel would undoubtedly turn heads, even among iOS gaming refuseniks.

Finally, there was a subtle touch - the unveiling of the TV advertisement for Apple's new iPod Touch devices. At least half of the advert was dedicated to footage of games on the device, significantly more time than was given over to the new headline features (HD video recording and the FaceTime video conferencing system).

Having finally embraced its position as the gatekeeper of one of the fastest growing gaming platforms in the world, Apple finds itself with a unique window of opportunity. Although the gaming world is excited about Nintendo's 3DS, it has yet to penetrate the consciousness of the wider audience - and it will almost certainly lack decent online functionality of the type promised by GameCenter.

Sony, meanwhile, is in the wilderness with the PSP - a device which, although it continues to get high-quality software releases, is in desperate need of a hardware refresh to bring it up to date with consumer expectations of a piece of portable hardware of this type.

In the meantime, Apple finds itself with a range of devices which are comfortably the most powerful handheld gaming platforms around, which sport a mature and trusted digital distribution system, a large installed base, a huge software library and, in the coming weeks, a built-in online gaming solution.

Some analysts have compared Apple's entry into handheld gaming to Microsoft's entry into the console market - yet the comparison with Microsoft's multi-billion dollar landgrab actually underestimates the threat posed by Apple's devices to Nintendo and Sony, if anything. How they respond in the coming 12 months - and how Android handsets develop in the same timescale - is likely to determine the shape of the handheld gaming market for years to come.

More stories

Roblox backs Apple in ongoing battle against Epic's appeal

Company behind popular kids game says App Store “enhances safety and security”

By James Batchelor

Apple calls on court to reject Epic's appeal

But it may be another year before a hearing is called to decide the ongoing antitrust dispute

By James Batchelor

Latest comments (17)

Reco Hasan11 years ago
How can you tell, that the 3DS will "almost certainly lack descent online functionality", we don't know nothing about the handheld yet, besides the 3D without glasses thing.. I think, you forget that the iPod touch and the iPhone have a lack of a real important thing.. and that is 'buttons'! I'm an iPhone user and a gamer for almost my entire life and i gotta say, I play games like angry birds or tower defense games, but how would you play a 'real' 3D game like a shooter or an action/adventure? I don't see the iPhone really threatening sony or nintendo in the core market. Especially not with an iPhone and a battery within that will die after 2 hours playing angry birds, cause at the end of the day it's still a phone and what is a phone good for, when you're not able to make a call, just because you played a game running on UE3 while waiting for you bus..
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Sam Brown Lead Audio Programmer, TT Games11 years ago
"but how would you play a 'real' 3D game like a shooter or an action/adventure?"

We're all waiting to see how Carmack does it. :)
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Jason Avent Studio Head / Creative Director, TT Games Publishing11 years ago
I think the 3DS is going to surprise everyone. Nintendo are very aware of their competition and have been working on 3DS hardware and software for ages.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Show all comments (17)
Terence Gage Freelance writer 11 years ago
I agree with Jason's comment; Nintendo have ruled the handheld market with an iron fist for two decades and more, and have proved to be innovative, adaptable and versatile. I expect the 3DS will have some impressive features that keep pace with the iOS hardware.

Sony and Android are still unknown quantities though, and it will be interesting to see how they respond. The PlayStation brand doesn't really carry much weight on its own any more, so a PSP Phone would really have to offer the goods in terms of both hardware and software to put up a good fight.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Terence Gage on 3rd September 2010 10:50am

0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Rob Fahey Columnist, GamesIndustry.biz11 years ago
I don't doubt that the 3DS is going to be very impressive both in hardware and software terms, but bluntly I don't think Nintendo are going to go too far down the online gaming / social gaming path with it. So far they simply don't seem comfortable with that - they have their reasons, primarily to do with child protection, but in the end it puts them at a competitive disadvantage at a time when a large number of consumers are starting to view connected functionality as a default part of the gaming experience.

Don't interpret my comments as writing off the 3DS - that's not my intention. I'm as excited about it as the next gamer - but I don't think there's any disputing that its existence hasn't really penetrated the consciousness of non-gamers just yet.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Tom Keresztes Programmer 11 years ago
Android still has to mature a bit - before 2.2 you could only run apps from the internal memory, not from an external storage (SD card) - and even the very high-end Anroid handsets only have 128 megabytes or so, compared to the (at least) 8gigs offered by any iOS device. While this might seem to be a minor issue, it severely limits application size.
Also, there are a zillion Android devices, supporting various display sizes, requiring developers to produce multiple SKUs.
And, i am sure that Nintendo is innovative - in the 20 years they also made a few failures. Virtual Boy, the Gamecube, N64 were all interesting, but they were not performing well at their time.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Terence Gage Freelance writer 11 years ago
I don't think the Gamecube and N64 can really be classed as 'failures' - I mean, you still must be looking at 20-30 million sales each (?), and don't forget that unlike Sony and Microsoft, Nintendo have always sold hardware at a profit.

And I think the Nintendo of today is much more savvy than they were five years ago, and while they have suffered a few failures here and there, their core hardware in the handheld market has never failed to dominate the field.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Mark Hill Studying Computing & Networks, University of Abertay Dundee11 years ago
Videos available show controls on the iPhone in both games being similar to dual analog, but without the buttons, press two thumbs onto the screen and one controls strafing, while the other controls the view.
Not a bad control mechanism and with the interface entirely in software, they can mimic most other control layouts.
However, the lack of tactile feedback on the buttons is a problem, also the fact that (If I'm right about this) you can only press on two locations at once, as opposed to the number of simultaneous button presses and holds on every system being actively used now.
I suspect this will result in extra functions such as attacking being gestures, taps, or presses outside the defined 'analog' area(s). In effect, creating a virtual, developer customisable gamepad.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
For Apple to really threaten Nintendo, they will need a cheaper, sturdier version of the iPhone that kids can play with without any fear of being robbed or broken.
Until then, Nintendo will still have a clear edge over Apple, who seem to focus their attention on high priced updates that maintain a premium standard over the years (which I, as a wealthy adult, can enjoy much more than younger audiences).
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Matej Gause CEO, Mobilgamer11 years ago
iPhone or iPod touch already beated up Nintendo DS or PSP. You can say that Nintendo DS or PSP are much cheaper than iPhone but the true is that it is not to the point. Games for Nintendo DS and PSP are too expensive compared to $10 iPhone games (aaa tituls).

The enviroment of iOS is much better for developers and mainly for investors look it better to give their money to iPhone games company than somebody else.

And Android also showed to be not interesting for games and its lack of sales possibilities and large fragmentation make hard conditions for games developers. There is over 50 mobile handsets with Android OS and they are so different and in most cases porting games to them cost much more than their development. Even Android Market is the biggest junkyard of the world due to Googles politic ...
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Neil McPhillips Senior Development Manager, Blazing Griffin11 years ago
I have to say that I've been really impressed with the games on my new iPhone4. In the last few days I've bought Super Deadbeef, Mirror's Edge, Puzzle Agent, Hector and Plunderland. Also Epic's Citadel is, well... epic.

All of that was under £20 as well.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Andy Cowe Mobile developer, Moonjump11 years ago
The iPhone is the only appealing portable game device to me as both a developer and a gamer.

As a developer there is no contest due to the accessibility of development tools and the marketplace. As a gamer, the ease of development has created a range of innovative and interesting games that are rarely possible with Nintendo and Sony. This is due to the risks involved with the large budgets required, so playing safe with known risks is the norm.

Traditional controls do not map well to the buttonless iOS platform. A different approach is needed to really make use of the accelerometer and touchscreen, but this will not suit every game. It would be good to see a small Bluetooth controller get support, a Dualshock type device that could slip in a pocket, that would really scare the opposition.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Lawrence Makin Audio 11 years ago
I disagree entirely. Like all other things Apple, their games will be gimmicky.

The iPhone market (not sales, but actual market share) is contracting, Macs are still struggling - though Steam might help a smidge - on the gaming side, and let's face facts. With Jobs' Draconian operational methods, Apple will be hampered when it comes to big-budget games as they're all too hardcore or too reliant on proper consoles.

Why is Apple really doing this? One, Jobs is obsessed with money, and he realises that Macs will never take over the world, and iPhone is already in decline as the competitors have caught up. He's trying to Apple-ify yet another thing (gaming in this case) to keep the old cash register open.

Should the opposition be scared? Maybe if Apple ever decides to get into the peripheral world. Until then, definitely not. PS3, 360, Wii (and MUCH cheaper too), vs. the far more expensive iPhone (yes it's a phone, people!), or even worse the iPad...hmmm, what to do, what to do...

The one thing going for them is that the inferior games/ports are much cheaper on the iPhone. If they make a significant dent in the Big Three due to game prices driving sales, maybe we'll see game price drops elsewhere.

Until then, I'll take Apple with a pinch of salt. It'll taste disgusting, as always.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
John Blackburne Programmers 11 years ago
Sony seem to have blown it with the PSP, and MS's efforts with Windows phone 7 are even less impressive, but I would not count Nintendo out. The 3DS, a DS with 3D, sounds pretty uninspiring. With what phones can do now I think fewer and fewer people of all ages will want a dedicated games portable, especially one with the DS's form factor.

But Nintendo are not stupid and caught out the opposition with the DS and Wii. There's no reason they can't do it again as long as they realise their competition is Apple and raise their game. Give the next DS a touch screen, display and motion detection to match the iPhone, except with enough power to drive two screens: make it easy for developers to port iPhone games to it and make it possible for users to play games on one screen and run apps (a music player, web browser, mail program) on the other. Essentially make it a better iPod touch/iPhone (maybe even with phone capabilities) which also plays the DS's back catalog (maybe with clip-on controllers to keep the form factor compact).
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Thomas Luecking11 years ago
Just to remember everybody where Nintendo gets its sales from, here is a real life example:

My 8 year old half brother owns a DS for 2 years, as do almost ALL of his classmates (Boys AND girls). Plus half of them already have a Wii console at home. I doubt that these Kids will download Apps via their IPhones any time soon...
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
Honestly the iPhone and other Apple devices are taking gaming into a more social and casual realm, I cant compare the way people talk of games and apps on the iPhone to any other platform. The ease of use and permanent access to the store, It really becomes a big part of peoples social life. Though this is true for console gaming, the variety of experiences the Appstore has to offer makes the audience very varied.

The Appstore is balancing out more and more, there seem to be more indy high quality titles and the platform itself is improving all the time.

Speaking personally about development, we just made a game. We had an idea we thought sounded like something we would want to play ourselves and wanted to make it as good as possible - we just found the time where we could. There were no discussions or outside influences beyond what we could do ourselves, It feels more natural and the potential is huge.

No other platform feels as feasible to access and it feels whatever we decide to make there will be some people wanting to play it as long as its good, this kind of creative freedom feels invaluable.

Neil McPhillips - Glad you enjoyed Plunderland.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply
John Blackburne Programmers 11 years ago
Thomas: that is part of Nintendo's market, but their genius was making games machines that appealed people of all ages and to both hardcore and casual markets, while Sony and Microsoft seemed more interested in a hardcore, young male, demographic. The DS has a very broad appeal and large market.

I bought a DS and am a lot older than you or your half-brother, but I won't buy its successor; my next handheld gaming platform will probably an iOS device. And kids if anything are more in tune with what's new, fashionable and cool, and would get an iPhone if they could afford it or persuade someone to buy one for them.
0Sign inorRegisterto rate and reply

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.