Close
Report Comment to a Moderator Our Moderators review all comments for abusive and offensive language, and ensure comments are from Verified Users only.
Please report a comment only if you feel it requires our urgent attention.
I understand, report it. Cancel

Study links violent behaviour to individual personalities

Tue 08 Jun 2010 8:34am GMT / 4:34am EDT / 1:34am PDT

Research claims media links to violent videogames may "obscure a large portion of the equation"

A new study into violent behaviour and the possible influence of videogames has concluded that effects are likely to be limited only to those whose "personalities are predisposed to be highly neurotic, less agreeable and less conscientious."

The research, conducted by Dr Patrick Markey of Villanova University and Dr Charlotte Markey of Rutgers Univeristy, ties in with prior findings involving children exposed to violent TV programmes and cartoons with similar results.

"Individuals are not 'blank slates,'" explained Patrick Markey. "One's general disposition moderates the effect of violent media. General policy recommendations based on the notion that violent videogames (VVGs) are simply 'bad' and individuals who play violent videogames will inevitably become aggressive appear to be unwarranted.

"Instead it is crucial to consider the dispositional characteristics of the person playing the videogame when predicting the type of effect the violent videogame might have on his or her hostility."

Specifically the research indicated a "perfect storm" of personality traits that could lead to vulnerability - a high level of neuroticism, low agreeableness and low conscientiousness.

Violent and non-violent games were then played by 118 teenagers, and hostility levels assessed, with those individuals displaying the "perfect storm" traits most adversely affected - while participants "who did not possess these personality characteristics were either unaffected or only slightly negatively affected".

"Although the incidences of violence, particularly school violence, linked to videogames are alarming, what should perhaps surprise us more is that there are not more VVG-driven violent episodes," the report concludes. "Given the number of youths who regularly engage in VVG play and the general concern regarding this media, it would seem likely that resulting violent episodes would be a regular occurrence. And yet, daily reports of mass violence are not reported.

"It appears that the vast majority of individuals exposed to VVGs do not become violent in the 'real world.' Thus, the questions for researchers, policymakers, and laypersons become: 'Why do some individuals appear to be affected by VVGs while others are not?' and 'Who is most likely to be affected by VVGs?'"

The full text of the report is available on the apa.org website.

15 Comments

Sandy Lobban
Founder and Creative Director

314 206 0.7
Generally proves what everyone with common sense has always said.

Posted:4 years ago

#1

Michael Abraham
game designer

37 0 0.0
so basically the study has concluded that aggressive and anti-social people are more likely to be prone to violent tendencies as a result of stimuli.
i'd say it's a "common sense" statement anyway, but the amount of people that have knee-jerked that violent media (games/movies/tv shows) was responsible just shows that the whole idea of "common sense" is flawed in the 1st place.

well, at least we now have some scientific data to back it up, that's gotta be good for something.

Posted:4 years ago

#2

gi biz
;,pgc.eu

341 51 0.1
Agreed. Another research now might be "why some people need reaserch results to understand the obvious while some other doesn't?"
Anyways, after such a heavy and long campaign against violent games (I remember articles in newspapers already at the time of Silent Hill), changing the opinion of people will take at least as long, imo. I hope this research won't die as an isolated case.

Posted:4 years ago

#3

Phil Elliott
Project Leader, Collective; Head of Community (Live Team)

163 29 0.2
I think a lot of people in the industry would agree that this all generally sounds sensible - but it's actually pretty important that such conclusions can be based in some degree of scientific fact.

What's interesting is that it does actually say, therefore, that violent videogames can have an effect on some people, albeit at the extreme end of society - something which also seems fair.

What society has to decide is whether or not it should legislate for the individual and ban material that could influence these people, or take the line that it has generally done with literature and film and opt for more freedom.

Posted:4 years ago

#4

Kingman Cheng
Illustrator and Animator

954 182 0.2
A nice study to confirm what everyone else in the world said apart from selective parents, politicians and Jack Thompson. Why is time spend on research on common sensical topics. People have tried to prove the whole video game violence thing, failed but still continued to insist it's true. My mother is such a person to have been brainwashed by news scaremongering.

What's next for scientific research? Is it cleaner to vacuum your room with your nostrils or vacuum cleaner?

Posted:4 years ago

#5

Terence Gage
Freelance writer

1,288 120 0.1
You make a good point Phil, but as we discussed/commented in the recent article about Switzerland voting to ban violent games, I would hope governments act to introduce tougher rules and policing regarding minors playing/being supplied with games, as opposed to restricting everyone's choice.

In the '80s it was banned and nasty films being blamed for violence amongst youths, and now games are in the crosshairs. There always has to be a scapegoat, and common sense rarely comes into it.

Posted:4 years ago

#6

Ben Hewett
Studying MA Philosophy

40 1 0.0
Kingman Cheng - This kind of research is essential; 'common sense' is more often than not derived from what is considered socially acceptable, which itself is often quite far from the truth of the matter. Therefore, this kind of 'common sensical' research is essential to either provide justifcation for our common sensical views or to dispel mere prejudice.

Edited 2 times. Last edit by Ben Hewett on 8th June 2010 11:53am

Posted:4 years ago

#7
Prejudice against violence in videogames (or any form of media for that matter) will always exist, but as games are becoming more a part of society and more accepted these kinds of prejudices will become much less, for want of a better word, 'mainstream'.

Certainly here in the UK we have seen more politicians suddenly declaring their support for the industry (whether this will continue now that the election is over we'll have to wait and see). I think that people feel that they need 'something' rather than 'someone' to blame society's problems on. Now it seems that social networking is the new 'evil' in question.

Posted:4 years ago

#8

Philip Wride
Producer - Community

6 0 0.0
Hurrah, another scientific report that backs up what a lot of people have been saying all along. It is only the minority that will be affected based on a combination of factors and isn't the "norm".

I remember one of the first things I said to Tanya Byron when she started her research into videogames and that went along the lines of "played violent sports at school, and violent videogames for 8 years and still not killed anyone".

I'll be looking to see what the rest of the UKCCIS members think of this research in the next group meeting we have, will be interesting to hear their thoughts.

Posted:4 years ago

#9

Kingman Cheng
Illustrator and Animator

954 182 0.2
Ben, I'll agree with you there, if the people want figures and stats then I guess the best way is to feed it to them.

Joseph, that's because they finally see (after years of badgering) that computer games are something that's very investible. So some of the guys who said games were part of our problems has now suddenly it's all gravy because it's bringing in money. I agree, it's just media trends and scaremongering.

Philip, I was in the generation of kids that was brought up with Looney Toons, Tom and Jerry and all that. I don't ever recall dropping anvils on peoples heads or smashing people in with sledgehammers. ;)

Posted:4 years ago

#10

Alfonso Sexto
Lead Tester

817 652 0.8
And in the end politicians and J. Thompson copycats will just act according to whatever gives then profit and votes, as always.

Posted:4 years ago

#11

J B
Technical Artist

8 0 0.0
Knowing that unstable people can be more easily pushed over the line, e.g. Joran Van der Sloot, doesn't tell us where the line is and who those likely psychos are. We need more of these studies if we intend on finding ways to help susceptible people avoid violent behavior.

Posted:4 years ago

#12

Walt Pretorius
Publisher

3 0 0.0



Posted:4 years ago

#13

Philipp Nassau
Student - Business Administration (M. Sc.)

51 19 0.4
To be honest, I have little faith in the majority understanding the difference between correlation and causality. This study proves what my father once said to my mother in I think 96 when she was concerned with me playing VVGs: "Yes, violent people often play those games. But I think they play them, because they're already violent. It doesn't have to work the other way round."
Yet, most people only see: school shooters all played FPS. Ban FPS. The majority doesn't react on science, they react on the media, their agenda setting and priming, mostly even framing. So, as sarcastic as this sounds, we would need another school shotting and a bunch of courageous media to then blame something else (because there always needs to be something) and show these studies to all those in doubt. It'd take the pressure off this industry, but only change the victim, as the problem itself, sadly, cannot be solved anyway.

Posted:4 years ago

#14
"Why is time spend on research on common sensical topics"

Because what people believe to be "common sense" often has very little basis in fact. Research often ends in results that run counter to most peoples' intuition. It's important to determine these things scientifically, so that we have a sound basis for any conclusions that are made.

Consider also, that many people believe that it common sense that violent video games make people violent.

Posted:4 years ago

#15

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now