Close
Are you sure? Are you sure you want to report this comment? I understand, report it. Cancel

Digital Foundry

Tech Analysis: Killzone: Shadow Fall demo

Tech Analysis: Killzone: Shadow Fall demo

Mon 25 Feb 2013 10:50am GMT / 5:50am EST / 2:50am PST
Digital Foundry

Digital Foundry's take on Guerrilla Games' PS4 debut

This is it. This is PlayStation 4. With the reveal of Killzone: Shadow Fall we have our first glimpse at real-time next-generation gameplay, giving us some idea of what to expect from a technical perspective from Sony's brand new hardware. Those hoping for a leap towards 1080p resolution are likely to be pleased with the developer's efforts, while those lusting after a new 60FPS standard should prepare for disappointment. In Shadow Fall, enhanced detail, superlative effects work and solid performance are the focus over and above the 1080p60 dream, but the question is, just how much of a leap does Shadow Fall represent over what we already have? Is this truly next-generation stuff?

"All material we have available suggests that the new PS4 Killzone runs at a rock-solid 30 frames per second at 1080p full HD resolution"

First impressions of the new Killzone from a technical perspective certainly don't disappoint. The tour starts with a spectacular fly around of Vekta's glimmering citadel, showing off whizzing hover-cars, tumbling waterfalls, flapping ISA banners, and more cherry blossom trees than would frankly make the cut for most other shooters. The Killzone franchise has been defined by a darker, murkier, grimier aesthetic but clearly developer Guerrilla Games intends to show off a bit more colour this time around - at least in its opening gambit - and the results are immediately eye-catching.

Last week's visually compromised live-stream and the Facebook gameplay upload don't really do justice to the scale of the visual achievement, but luckily we have access to alternative assets that completely eliminate the macroblocking blur and reveal the full extent of the new Killzone's splendour. A full HD trailer encoded in Apple's ProRes format grants us the opportunity to pore over the game's finer details at a quality level akin to the software running right in front of us. So with this resource available, it's relatively straightforward to build up a picture of Guerrilla Games' vision of what we should expect from next-gen PlayStation hardware - and 1080p is clearly the focus.

To understand this platform's future we have to address the past. Looking back at the start of this generation, the bulk of the PS3's only true, native 1920x1080 titles made an appearance during the platform's launch window. This short list included NBA '07, Tekken: Dark Resurrection and Ridge Racer 7 - all older games, where each respective engine was unshackled by the PS2's constraints on new hardware to achieve a solid 60 FPS update and attain the full HD dream. The following seven years tell a very different story, however, for both 360 and PS3 alike. With an emphasis on higher-poly environments, sharper textures, deferred lighting and advanced physics engines, we now have more technically demanding titles like Crysis 3 resorting to sub-HD frame-buffers, and often struggling to uphold their target 30FPS.

30FPS is the target for Killzone: Shadow Fall, and we don't detect a single dip in performance from this based on the uploaded gameplay feed - a fact mirrored in the 1080p trailer we also have available. It's fair to assume that 30FPS remains the console standard for next-gen.

Fast forward to the present, and we should take it as read that full HD is now the standard. Killzone: Shadow Fall is set to wave the 1080p banner when it arrives, and based on close, frame-by-frame scrutiny of the trailer, we can confirm this target is being realised fully here, giving us a crisp level of image quality we seldom see outside of PC gaming. But, while this leap gives us an impressive 2.25x pixel increase over the 1280x720 seen in Killzone 3, is this standard actually here to stay for all future releases?

The available evidence from this and other Sony trailers suggests that this is indeed the case, owing to the vastly higher fill-rates afforded by the PS4's powerful Radeon graphics processor. Chief among the priorities in its design is of 176GB/s memory bandwidth at its disposal in concert with a whopping 32 ROPs - stats that place these aspects of the PS4's architecture on a par with some of the fastest PC rendering hardware. Put into perspective, this level of throughput exceeds that of even capable £120+ PC graphics cards, including current mid-range favourite the Radeon HD 7850. Recent benchmarks of this card show little issue in running DirectX 11 titles like Battlefield 3 on high settings at 1080p60. In other words, given the right optimisation for the new version of Sony's custom LibGCM graphics library, there's more than enough of an overhead for the PS4 to push for more than what we're seeing here - or at least break even with 1080p going forward.

"Geometry detail, lighting and effects work are a leap beyond anything we've seen on the current generation consoles"

Even with such a high resolution in place, anti-aliasing is still necessary. The series has used a range of post-processing methods in the past, going from the blur-inducing quincunx of Killzone 2, to the sharper morphological (MLAA) method in Killzone 3. Given that we see image treatment in Killzone: Shadow Fall extends to non-geometric elements such as foliage, there's a strong indication that a post-process approach is making a return here and we wouldn't be surprised to see the return of MLAA in effect. This is backed up by the light shimmer effect we see on high-contrast edges too, showing sub-pixel noise which this method typically has trouble addressing. Even with these artifacts though, the image looks far beyond the quality console gamers have grown accustomed to. The fact is that, with more resolution to work with, the issues that have blighted post-processing AA in the current-gen era are far less of an issue at 1080p.

Looking past image quality, we see shader effects have been upgraded across the board from Killzone 3, encompassing heat fumes under jets, water streams from Vekta's building-sides, and the invisibility cloaking on the Helghan saboteur. Once the action kicks off proper, we spot per-object motion blur in effect too, as NPCs run individually across the war-torn streets, and across Lucas' fingertips as he reaches for the clip of his gun. Alas, the strength of the effect doesn't come out in full force on the Facebook video (as uploaded during the conference itself) due to compression, but it's very much alive and kicking and will be much more pronounced when you play the game yourself.

"Having proved its mastery of deferred lighting in its PS3 outings, Guerrilla takes it to a whole new level in Shadow Fall"

The sheer volume of on-screen geometry marks a bold step forward over what we've previously seen - though gameplay while on-foot is still restricted to narrow pathways. The city guards, buildings, trees and aircraft are instanced to minimise the amount of vertex data committed to the PS4's RAM; a trick we see in shooters such as Battlefield 3 too. It's well-disguised, with structures at the city basin rendered in real-time but duplicated at all manner of angles to create the illusion of a city sprawl, with the swarms of aircraft being shaded differently too. Though these are at a suitable distance to mask the trick, it's a tad glaring when ISA soldiers stand directly side-by-side in front of our lead character, with matching facial expressions used for each rig. No doubt, this is the inevitable upshot of peering into a game world via a far higher-resolution window, where all strengths and weaknesses are amplified.

Other shortcuts are surprising given the theoretical strengths of the PS4's eight-core CPU running in tandem with an 800MHz-clocked Radeon GPU. The reflection-mapping across the city's many skyscrapers may be mesmerising on first sight, but on closer analysis it's clear these surfaces aren't mirroring nearby geometry at all. Instead, Shadow Fall uses a substituted background layer of unrelated buildings to fake the effect, with no passing aircraft factoring in. As with the instancing workaround for geometry, however, the whole scene is typically moving too fast for this to become apparent; it works convincingly for the split seconds it passes your viewpoint, and then it's gone.

With regards texture detail, there isn't typically much striking about clean, utopian cities in video games. On the ground, we see LOD transitions for cherry blossom petals and newspapers, each gradually fading in as Lucas approaches, but the rest is as crystal clear and pristine as we'd expect. There's also no apparent pop-in for geometry, but weirdly enough for a game carrying this level of presentation, there are z-fighting issues on distant buildings, where overlapping textures of equal z-buffer values flicker into view alternately.

Thankfully, the white sheen of the city is replaced by bump-mapped cracks after the Helghan siege hits, coating the geometry with a degree of detail that matches our expectations of a next-gen FPS. Filtering cascades are detectable on the ground at this point, though, particularly on straight shadow lines, which is a little surprising given the capabilities of the hardware, and we expected the smoother anisotropic approach to make the cut. This is also odd given the range of far more demanding effects on show, such as screen-space ambient occlusion (SSAO), and the full-resolution alpha buffers used to create the billowing dust clouds beneath aircraft.

"Those expecting fluid 60FPS titles from day one will be disappointed - here the emphasis is placed on a cinematic spectacle rendered at 1080p30"

Having proven its mastery over deferred lighting in Killzone 2 and 3, Guerrilla Games is back to prove its point again in style. This time, the light-source count has bumped up considerably, with lamps lining the street floors, individually lit particles for friction sparks and flames, and global illumination - all of which bring out a vivid lens flare effect and light shafts. We see SSAO mix in with the dynamic shadows, too, the telltale sign being the dark halo artifact that forms around Lucas' gun on approaching light cover - expected, given that similar PC GPUs struggle once the horizon-based version is added. Even so, the effect adds some much-needed depth to the scene by filling in small gaps with a flourishes of shading. For a game so predicated on the dark and gritty aesthetic, it's set to be a good match as we venture further into the Helghan's smoggy, industrialised wastelands.

Havok physics on objects also make a return, with cloth simulation applied to flapping banners. As with the last release, each bullet impact clearly knocks each body part of the Helghast with according force, until we're left with ragdoll-style corpses on the ground. Alas, there isn't much in the way of destructible geometry in the vein of Battlefield 3, even in pre-determined chunks, with much of the chipping to the walls apparently pre-baked. The enemy AI flanks and adapts to the player movement in similar ways as before, but the stiff running animations from gormless-looking civilian NPCs bring us hurtling back down to reality. Even so, it's early days - and a very isolated use of these elements.

It's a beautiful game overall, but with compromises that only make sense if frame-rate has become the priority. Those hoping to see a trend of fluid 60FPS titles begin from day one will be disappointed, but for Shadow Fall the emphasis is placed on a cinematic spectacle rendered at 1080p30. The frame-rate is confirmed to be capped at 30FPS during interviews with the studio, and based on our feed we see this is absolutely 100 per cent stable throughout the entire demo. No drops, no screen tearing - it's a smooth play-through all the way, suggesting that the frame-rate could be running higher if it weren't locked down on this figure. So there's no 1080p60 here and Guerrilla's decision to lock at 30 also has implications for controller latency - it's a shame that Killzone won't have the crisp response that only 60Hz provides, and that helps makes PC gaming attractive to so many.

As it stands, the condition of Killzone: Shadow Fall's demo hints at the greater promise of its full release later this year. Regardless, and perhaps most importantly, out of all the titles showcased at Sony's event this week, Guerrilla Games is making the most practical declaration of intent for the future of PS4. Here we have unscripted stretches of gameplay on display with a multitude of effects we may well have seen in isolation on PS3, but rarely all in tandem, and never at this incredible sense of scale.

There are some curious cut-backs we didn't expect to see, but there's plenty of development time remaining until the game is finished, and with the bar being raised in almost every other category, it's perhaps inevitable that certain shortcomings - specific hangovers from the last generation - might rise to the surface. On the positive side, the push for higher-grade volumetric effects, masses of on-screen geometry, object-based motion blur, SSAO, and a full 1080p native frame-buffer all stand as the big selling points from a technical perspective in the here and now.

Based on specs alone, the PS4 clearly has far more to offer than what we're seeing, and it's worth remembering that Guerrilla would have developed a large chunk of Shadow Fall on incomplete hardware. Our understanding is that final kits based on actual PS4 production hardware are a relatively recent phenomenon, and now the developer has a fixed target to aim for, we may well see significant engine improvements. But if this stands as the level of technical quality we should expect for Shadow Fall's final release, we'll be due for one of the most technically compelling launch titles we've seen in a very long time.

14 Comments

I only watched what was present in the Sony presentation,. and although it was definitely pretty - it really didn't strike me as "next-gen" at all. In fact, if it truly does run at 30fps... that is incredibly disappointing, given the power available. More so that they aren't even TRYING to make it run at 60fps. Surely FPS > native resolution?

Assuming its "real" (i.e. true in-game), the only thing I saw that really impressed me as next-gen is Capcom's "Deep Down" trailer/demo.

Posted:A year ago

#1

Jonathan McEnroe
Freelance 2D artist

47 20 0.4
Popular Comment
1080p at a locked 30fps frame rate looks incredibly cinematic. Some of today's top end PCs don't even play Crysis 3 at a constant 60fps (check out Gamersyde's recent videos, the game stutters and shifts from 60fps to lower frame rates while using 2 of the top NVIDIA GFX Cards, 16GBs of RAM and an overclocked 4GHz i7 Processor). As a launch title, this is a stupidly impressive leap forward over the current generation of consoles, so in that respect this IS next generation and on par with PC's current generation of technology, which is way ahead of 360 and PS3. Looking forward to playing this when it comes out, it's absolutely stunning for a launch title. The gameplay looks a lot more chaotic and fast paced compaired to KZ 1, 2 and 3. Great stuff! :D

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Jonathan McEnroe on 25th February 2013 12:00pm

Posted:A year ago

#2

Adam Campbell
Associate Producer

1,135 914 0.8
It meets my expectation for an early 1080p game. Expands on existing technologies and rendering ideas but takes advantage of the high performance to pump up full resolution and use higher quality assets that would have been downscaled for PS3. Still, I'll be expecting a lot more in the future with more sophisticated next generation shaders and technical approaches.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Adam Campbell on 25th February 2013 12:13pm

Posted:A year ago

#3

Tom Keresztes
Programmer

631 238 0.4
It was running on a PC, not on the actual hardware. Even if it was running real-time, It should be taken with a pinch of salt.

Posted:A year ago

#4

Emily Knox
Associate Designer

46 95 2.1
Thankfully, the white sheen of the city is replaced by bump-mapped cracks after the Helghan siege hits, coating the geometry with a degree of detail that matches our expectations of a next-gen FPS.
I'd actually be sad to see too many of those glimmering buildings getting smashed to pieces! Gritty, grimy, dirty, destroyed surfaces feel very familiar in Killzone, I'd really like to see more of Vekta glistening, that's a more interesting look to me, but that's purely personal preference. I thought the original had more interesting and varied locations, having the Helghast tread into the clean, bright mall, the open dock areas, those expansive military bases in the snow, and the odd vast city section to traverse were more inspiring to me than the continually dark, dank grime of Helghan in KZ2... I'm very interested to see where Shadow Fall takes us.
All that sunlight, glass, and sheer volume of space below reminds me of Mirrors Edge, it looks spectacular.

Posted:A year ago

#5

Jonathan McEnroe
Freelance 2D artist

47 20 0.4
Speaking of Mirror's Edge, I hope we see a next gen Mirror's Edge 2 announced at E3 this year!

It's a nice change of scenery in Killzone: Shadow Fall and I think we'll be seeing both sides of the wall throughout the campaign. Cannot wait to see more of this, the clean cityscape looks incredible! :D

Posted:A year ago

#6

Peter Dwyer
Games Designer/Developer

481 290 0.6
I can foresee the first batch of games looking very similar until developers start to take advantage of and optimise the available shader techniques. Things I expect to see frequently in the first batch.

1. Overuse of glass and reflections.
2. Overuse of transparent skin shaders.
3. Overuse of ridiculous draw distances.
4. Motion Blur. Lots of motion blur! At some point someone will realise it makes people sick because it simulates movement while the person watching isn't actually moving.

Ironically I'm certain that the thing that will get people most excitied initially, will be something like a 1080p Halo 5 with armour shaders and some rich, lush jungle planet. It will be easier to get an alien vista with armoured enemies to look like it's straight out of a cut scene than it will to get anything with human characters to have this kind of fidelity (fidelity, my new drop in word of the month). I for one am looking forward to Dead Space 4 with a nice super detailed encounter suit and ugly fleshy looking Alien necromorphs as poor Isacc heads towards the source of the planet sized menace to stop it re-grouping.

Posted:A year ago

#7

Seb Downie
Producer

26 23 0.9
Popular Comment
Tom Keresztes
It was running on a PC, not on the actual hardware. Even if it was running real-time, It should be taken with a pinch of salt.
It was running on target hardware. Not on PC. All live on the night.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Seb Downie on 25th February 2013 4:59pm

Posted:A year ago

#8

Jose Martin
Entrepreneur & Financing - Media / Tech / Interactive Entertainment

23 19 0.8
All in all - some nice upgraded visuals on display in most game footage shown but nothing that made my jaw drop in amazement, not counting any non-game tech demos like Square Enix's old demo of the Luminous engine (seriously, what was the point of showing that old footage again, misstep by Sony) but there was one exception - "Deep Down" - WOW - that looked unreal -blew my hair back... like they were "playing" real-time in what could have only been a pre-rendered cut scene in current gen.

I would love to see a tech analysis of that short piece of footage. If a whole game looked like that trailer - I'd pay whatever they asked for a PS4!!

Posted:A year ago

#9

Daniel Roy
Studying Bachelor of Games and Interactive Entertainment

4 0 0.0
So that basically means a PC running PS4 hardware, yeah?

Posted:A year ago

#10

Cameron Lourenco
Studying Business Managemant

21 16 0.8
Everyone whining should stop complaining. Developers were given dev kits with just 2-4 GB of DDR5 RAM, it was a surprise even to developers that it would have 8 GB. Given this, the first batch of games won't take anywhere near the full advantage that the console can push. Early titles should never be the benchmark of what a console can do, you always need to wait a couple of years before the cream of the crop is released.

Does anyone remember what early PS2 games looked like compared to later releases? How good is your memory, do you remember what PS3 launch games looked like? They're unbearable after playing the Uncharteds, the Killzones, the Gran Turismos, the Metal Gear Solid (just 4), people need to relax and stop crying fowl that it doesn't run 60 frames per second.

You don't always need 60 FPS to have fun, sometimes it's nice as a developer to push more polygons, have more advanced AI, and just more happening on the screen and run 30 FPS locked, where you still have fun, you don't have a ton of screen tearing or frame rate drops when the action gets heavy, it's just a smoother experience with a lot more game. I get it that some devs will want 60FPS for their racing games, sports games etc, since you can really only show so much on a sports field or a race track anyway.

The PS4 will be a bargain no matter how much it costs. I can't believe they have a GPU that runs unified 8 GM of GDDR5 RAM, when Nvidia just released its $1000 Geforce Titan graphics card, that has "just" 6GB of GDDR5 RAM. If you had a PS4 running against a PC with the same capabilities, you'd have a nuclear powerplant that costs more than what I paid for my used car.

Posted:A year ago

#11

Jose Martin
Entrepreneur & Financing - Media / Tech / Interactive Entertainment

23 19 0.8
The PS4 will be a bargain no matter how much it costs
Well yes, that would certainly be worth $499 (which may be the high end model price point), I hope it doesn't sound like I was complaining....I think many people were just making the observation that most of the demos didn't reveal anything that would make you want to camp out for two days and be the first to have a PS4. Of course, as you stated, devs will truly turn out some amazing stuff once they have some significant time with the real full spec hardware.

Don't think anyone is saying the kit specs didn't impress...8 gigs of unified GDDR5 was an awesome surprise, since the rumors beforehand were touting only 4gigs of GDDR5.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Jose Martin on 26th February 2013 12:02am

Posted:A year ago

#12

Yiannis Koumoutzelis
Founder & Creative Director

358 187 0.5
If nobody was trying to convince us that this is high quality "next gen" visuals most probably there would be no complains. This "high res footage" is not really going to change the opinion of professionals who understand what they see even on low res footage.

What we saw and i mean no disrespect to the hard work of Guerilla which is a world class team, and that is why one expects (and undoubtedly they can deliver) far more than the average development team is this:

Low resolution NPCs. Lots of boxy buildings with angular parts and old school reflective shaders, low res props, several identical city blocks, and even pairs of NPCs that looked identical and show normal map inconsistencies, combined with aliasing and current gen lighting all over the place. Thankfully, there were a couple of curvy elements there to cheat the eye. These can't convince anyone about the high fidelity of the result shown no matter how much you increase the resolution of the footage.

With higher resolution, studios will encounter the same problem films did. Higher resolution needs vastly increased visual information. Not only in model detail, but animation nuances as well, lots of secondary animation, something that the majority of games already are lacking! That is where the cost will come in. (Models are already being detailed quite highly in zbrush/mudbox so the primary displacement and normal detail data is there, but the animation has to be greatly improved)
Stylized visuals are a solution but not all games are envisioned in the same way.

Some examples because i understand different people have different criteria.
When we claim LIFELIKE high polygon characters this is what it should mean:
http://cghub.com/images/view/364441/
http://cghub.com/images/view/209778/
http://cghub.com/images/view/359523/
http://cghub.com/images/view/248382/
http://cghub.com/images/view/146964/
http://cghub.com/images/view/5499/

And when we talk about rich cinematic quality environments this is what they should feel like.
http://cghub.com/images/view/80441/
http://cghub.com/images/view/197539/
http://cghub.com/images/view/201373/
http://cghub.com/images/view/381930/

In general, game engines have the potential to produce such quality especially on a PC. But at what framerates in a real console game? That remains to be seen. Can PS4 provide that quality? Could be. That also remains to be seen.

I am not convinced yet.

Posted:A year ago

#13

Andreas Gschwari
Senior Games Designer

555 606 1.1
It looks impressive and gorgeous from a visuals point of view. 1080p and 30fps is a great leap forward. Killzone has always been technically impressive IMO. As a launch title it will show off visual quality but i am not sure it will actually shift consoles.

The previous Killzone games have had, i feel, a reasonably high entry level with regards to skill and little reward for time invested - compared to other big FPS names. Sales have been good, but not stellar. The crowd buying Killzone will likely buy the PS4 regardless.I would hazard a guess not many people would buy a PS4 because of Killzone.

I feel both consoles suffer the same problem with the next wave of release for both Battlefield and CoD also being available on current gen (as far as i can see) - where installed user base (and therefor multiplayer numbers) will win out. At the launch of the 360, Call of Duty 2 became available which saw a big shift in gamers moving to that platform - this is not the case this time around.

It will depend on other launch titles to shift units i think, and it will also depend on the launch titles/exclusives the 360 has to offer, on how well the PS4 will do at launch.

Posted:A year ago

#14

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now