Close
Are you sure? Are you sure you want to report this comment? I understand, report it. Cancel

Capcom takes new IP development back to Japan

Tue 02 Feb 2010 8:45am GMT / 3:45am EST / 12:45am PST
BusinessDevelopment

Bionic Commando and Dark Void flops prompt publisher to rethink global development

Capcom has said that it will develop the majority of new IP in Japan, after Western-developed titles such as Bionic Commando and Dark Void flopped at retail.

The company had previously dedicated significant resources to creating titles away from its Japanese base, in a bid to sell to a wider global audience.

Western partnerships are still viable, said Capcom, but only on titles that are already established in the company portfolio.

"Our experience with Bionic Commando has demonstrated the difficulty of outsourcing the development of new title to overseas companies," said Capcom. "Nevertheless, we cannot develop a sufficient number of titles without using the resources of these companies. This is why we plan to continue using these alliances.

"We are considering ways to separate the roles of activities in Japan and overseas. We plan to develop new titles primarily in Japan. Overseas companies may be used mostly to develop titles for existing game series with well-established characters and universal themes. Overseas companies will also handle certain parts and/or lineups of such games," detailed the publisher.

Bionic Commando developer GRIN went bust soon after the game was released. Airtight's Dark Void came out at the start of the year in Europe, and after Capcom had already reduced sales expectations, yesterday it acknowledged "potential shortfalls in sales" of the game.

7 Comments

Lets hope Capcom Japan re make Bionic Commando ... I was so looking foward to that game :(

Posted:4 years ago

#1

Tommy Thompson
Studying Artificial Intelligence (PhD)

110 0 0.0


I would be interested to know exactly what "difficulties" impacted the development of these games? Is there a conflict of gaming culture and ideas between what the publisher wants and the developer designs? Is there not sufficient finance for these partnerships? I've often felt the lack of marketing for Capcom games in the US and EU would be a major factor. Despite being big, shiny new IPs for players to get their hands on, games like Lost Planet, Dead Rising, Dark Void and Bionic Commando seem to rely more on good word of mouth. Meanwhile the latest Street Fighter or Resident Evil (on 360 or PS3) is marketed heavily.

If Capcom wish to continue developing for western audiences, perhaps focus on the franchises that do well in the US and EU and focus on their development and even re-invigorate them for these audiences. Sure Bionic Commando tried to do that and failed, but Street Fighter shows this is possible. What about the continued interest in the VS fighting series (please, please make Marvel Vs Capcom 3) or a proper return to the MegaMan X series given the interest in MegaMan 9 & 10? Rebooting the Resident Evil series to compete with major titles from the US?

Posted:4 years ago

#2

Tommy Alvarez
Lead Artist

2 0 0.0

Posted:4 years ago

#3

Soeren Lund
Producer

42 1 0.0
The difference between internally and externally developed titles is a question of financing. Internal teams seem to be able to get a deadline extension until the quality is just right whereas external teams, especially wholly independent third-party studios as Grin, need to re-negotiate the contracts every time a deadline is extended. At some point it stops making financial sense as every budget increase eats away from the potential royalties. If that happens you see studios going bankrupt between projects as there is no funding available to bridge projects.

The above is true for all projects developed by independent studios but with original IP it is maybe even more crucial to hit a certain quality mark before release and therefore finances have a tendency to become strained.

Posted:4 years ago

#4

Posted:4 years ago

#5

Phil Elliott
Project Leader, Collective; Head of Community (Live Team)

163 29 0.2
It's interesting to read this interview with Christian Svensson from late 2009, where he talks in-depth about the company's policy on Western dev collaborations:
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/ch...

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Phil Elliott on 2nd February 2010 3:38pm

Posted:4 years ago

#6
I also wonder if its a question of Asian vs Western aesthetics.

I've noticed that in delivery of art assets, the eastern tastes prefer all assets to be highly detailed and (excplained), whereas the western aesthetic favours some degree of abstraction, focusing on mood/atmosphere ablended with details.

Posted:4 years ago

#7

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now