Report Comment to a Moderator Our Moderators review all comments for abusive and offensive language, and ensure comments are from Verified Users only.
Please report a comment only if you feel it requires our urgent attention.
I understand, report it. Cancel

Philips alleges Nintendo patent infringement

By Matthew Handrahan

Philips alleges Nintendo patent infringement

Thu 15 May 2014 7:41am GMT / 3:41am EDT / 12:41am PDT

Files suit in the US, demands Wii consoles and peripherals be removed from sale

The electronics manufacturer Philips has filed a patent suit against NIntendo over its Wii consoles and peripheral controllers.

According to a document filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Philips has two patents relating to "interactive virtual modelling" and "human computer interaction" that have been infringed by Nintendo's console products ever since the launch of the Wii.

The first patent - referred to as "patent 379" - was issued to Philips in September 2001. It relates to a "Virtual Body Controlling Device," and Philips chas claimed that it informed Nintendo of its existence in a letter sent in November, 2011. The full patent can be found here.

The second patent - referred to as "patent 231" - is more ambiguous, as it was only filed by Philips in September 2013, well after the Wii had fallen from public favour and comfortably after the launch of the Wii U. It relates to a, "User Interface System Based on Pointing Device," and it can be found here.

Philips' claims seem to relate principally to the Wii Remote Controller, and specifically Wii MotionPlus. However, the suit argues that these devices are so essential to the experience offered by the consoles that they should not be considered as separate.

The devices named in the suit are as follows: "Wii console, Wii Remote Plus Controller, Wii Remote Controller, Wii Nunchuk Controller, Wii MotionPlus, Wii Balance Board, Wii U console, Wii U GamePad, and Wii Mini console."

Phillips is seeking damages, and has asked the court to halt sales of all the named devices in the United States. We have approached Nintendo for comment.

From Recommendations by Taboola


Matthew Handrahan European Deputy Editor,

143 159 1.1
Our CMS doesn't like the link to the first patent. For reference, here it is: file:///home/chronos/user/Downloads/US6285379.pdf

Posted:2 years ago


Adam Campbell Product Executive, Hopster

1,463 1,566 1.1
This doesn't seem like great timing!

Posted:2 years ago


Matthew Handrahan European Deputy Editor,

143 159 1.1
Hi Christian - and as a reminder to everyone - I linked to the first patent in the starting comment in this thread.

Posted:2 years ago


Neil Young Programmer, Rebellion Developments

356 486 1.4
The link in the article and the original post are to local files - note the "file://" scheme at the start of the URL.

Posted:2 years ago


Jim Webb Executive Editor/Community Director, E-mpire Ltd. Co.

2,522 3,225 1.3
What has this to do with the way the Wii or the Wii U controller works? The system as it is described in the Patent is based on a camera
The front of the Wii remote is actually an IR camera.

However, that patent is way too late to have any merit.

Posted:2 years ago


Nicholas Pantazis Senior Editor, VGChartz Ltd

1,025 1,486 1.4
Wrong company to target Philips. Nintendo doesn't settle patent trolls. They'll fight you to the last and you'll be paying their millions in legal fees.

Posted:2 years ago


Rick Lopez Illustrator, Graphic Designer

1,269 943 0.7
Philips has two patents relating to "interactive virtual modelling" and "human computer interaction", "patent 379"- "Virtual Body Controlling Device", "patent 231" - "User Interface System Based on Pointing Device,"
Honestly these patent descriptions seem very vague and ambiguous. They can be anything really...
The devices named in the suit are as follows: "Wii console, Wii Remote Plus Controller, Wii Remote Controller, Wii Nunchuk Controller, Wii MotionPlus, Wii Balance Board, Wii U console, Wii U GamePad, and Wii Mini console."
I dont recall phillips having a hand in the creation of any of these devices.

I just think they are trying to kick Nintendo while they are down, nothing more than patent trolling. And after what Phillips did when given the opportunity to create not 1, but 3 Zelda games... i think they should stay very quite.

Posted:2 years ago

Another example I suspect of how broken the global patent system is, all the patent system as is, tends to do nowadays is hold back human technological development, I suspect instead of generating profits it's putting a stopper on overall growth and damaging economies more than it contributes.

Companies can file bogus vague patents then take people who've been using the tech that may be remotely related to whatever they filed for donkeys years to court doing nothing but filling courtrooms wasting millions and making even more lawyers happy, it's like that darned episode of farscape the one where 90% of the populace turned into lawyers in some planet or other, the more lawyers there are the more they make reasons for there to be even more, the lawmakers are all lawyers as it is.

There no such thing as intellectual property, there no such thing as property either mind, land and buildings exist, property doesn't, hell even money is a concept, nowadays backed by nothing atall, there all just concept's and so can be changed, think of all the products that could be created if people were more free to combine all the latest innovations together whilst only having to pay a pre-set fixed percentage of final product cost fee for all patents used, no matter how many, and all these innovative products would help spure more innovative products, as they tend to do, the shere numbers sold would ensure inventors got their money's worthand and yet more potential for profit, no patents as they currently are now nothing but a blight on society, providing nothing of benefit to society companies or inventor's alike.

Posted:2 years ago


Greg Wilcox Creator, Destroy All Fanboys!

2,610 1,686 0.6
Perhaps Philips needs to invent a time machine so they could re-file this suit in, say... 2006? Not that they'd win back then, mind you... :P

Posted:2 years ago


Andrew Jakobs Lead Programmer

301 169 0.6
If you look at the original filing, yes it's files in the US on 2013, but it was already filed in 2002 in the EU.. But I agree, they should also have filed it in the US in 2002..

I wonder if Sony is paying Philips for the use of the patent, because the second one is clearly how the Move also works..

Posted:2 years ago


Paul Jace Merchandiser

1,199 2,048 1.7
Is this in regards to the CD-i? If so Philips needs to just take that loss and move on.

Posted:2 years ago


Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now