Sections

Judge overturns multimillion dollar award in Madden lawsuit

Ruling says jurors did not have enough evidence to conclude EA copied programmer's work

Last July, a jury sided with Robin Antonick in a lawsuit against Electronic Arts, saying the original John Madden Football programmer was owed millions in damages (plus decades of interest) for having his work copied by the publisher for years without credit. As reported by SF Gate, a federal judge this week reversed that award, saying the jury did not have enough evidence to support their conclusion.

Antonick alleged that EA's Madden games before 1996 were so similar to his original effort in terms of plays and formations that the games must have shared the original's source code. However, the judge ruled that the jurors hadn't been shown the games side-by-side as is typically required for a copyright infringement case. As a result, the jurors had no basis for their verdict, the judge said.

Lawyers for Antonick said their client would appeal the verdict, adding, "The evidence showed they used his source code without permission."

Related stories

EA sets five year goal for using neural networks in its games

Games will change more in the next five years than the last 45, CEO Andrew Wilson said

By Matthew Handrahan

Star Wars Battlefront II grabs spotlight at EA Play 2017

EA decided to show off a full 30 minutes of multiplayer gameplay, and also teased BioWare's new IP among other titles

By James Brightman

Latest comments

Sign in to contribute

Need an account? Register now.