Close
Are you sure? Are you sure you want to report this comment? I understand, report it. Cancel

Why Blow chose PlayStation 4

Why Blow chose PlayStation 4

Tue 12 Mar 2013 8:41am GMT / 4:41am EDT / 1:41am PDT
HardwareDevelopment

Braid designer on making The Witness a timed exclusive

Indie developer Jonathan Blow has revealed why he's decided to make his next game, The Witness, a timed exclusive for the new Sony PlayStation 4 console, citing technical and personal reasons.

"I've had a bad time working with Microsoft in the past," he explained to Edge.

"Maybe not super bad, but a moderately bad time in terms of business relationships. Other developers who are friends of mine have had a horrible time, so the idea of signing up again with Microsoft isn't something I'd have ruled out, but there's a certain amount of dread I have about doing that again. I don't have that with Sony. Who knows, maybe it'll turn out to be just as bad at the end! But I don't think so. The people we're talking to on a daily basis there are just really good people, and we're happy to work with them. We'll see how it goes."

Blow also said that the technical specs of the next Microsoft console, which were leaked last year, were a factor in the decision.

"To me they talk about a console that is not strictly about games. It's trying to be the centre of the living room device, which is fine and maybe it's the right thing for Microsoft to do, business-wise. I don't know; I actually don't think it is, but they've certainly thought about it more than me! As a place to put the best, highest performing version of our game on, it doesn't seem as good a choice."

He also cited Sony's attitude towards digital content and developers as important, praising it for realising the growing popularity of downloadable games.

Blow was just one of the developers who appeared at Sony's PlayStation 4 announcement, and The Witness is due for release this year.

12 Comments

Dave Herod
Senior Programmer

517 734 1.4
Not really sure I see the wisdom of bad-mouthing a partner you haven't ruled out working with again in public.

Posted:A year ago

#1

Dan Howdle
Head of Content

277 797 2.9
I'm feeling an ambivalent cocktail of admiration and confundity

Posted:A year ago

#2

Francis Cermak
Website Administrator

17 3 0.2
He's probably just mad he didn't get more money out of MS and is trying to publicly shame them into a better deal.

Posted:A year ago

#3

Tom Kleinenberg
3D Artists

5 2 0.4
I'm a little confused about bad-mouthing the hardware.Witness didn't seem that graphically intense - I struggle to see how its maxing out either console.

Posted:A year ago

#4

Adam Campbell
Associate Producer

1,136 914 0.8
Well, I don't see the issue with public critcisim if one's experience wasn't good. I publicly criticise companies that I feel have done wrong or not given me quite the customer service I expect.

It doesn't necessarily make the said company terrible but they have not met a customer's standard, the customer as an important individual should be impressed and catered for if possible and feedback used to make the product or service better.

Besides, its not really as if they (Microsoft Corp) would be able to discriminate against him should he wish to release titles through the usual process like any other studio.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Adam Campbell on 12th March 2013 10:28pm

Posted:A year ago

#5

Paul Jace
Merchandiser

868 1,273 1.5
Well it's only a timed exclusive so eventually it will be releasing for other platforms. But rather the next box is one of those platforms remains to be seen.

Posted:A year ago

#6

Nicholas Pantazis
Senior Editor

1,008 1,397 1.4
I agree with Adam. A lot of indie developers have had really bad experiences working with Microsoft on XBLA so I don't see why it's a shock to see another make similar comments.

As for Blow's game, just an FYI it's not actually timed exclusive to PS4. It's releasing simultaneously on PC. It's a timed console exclusive to PS4, which is rather like saying "I'm the the smartest kid in my school, if you don't count the advanced kids."

Posted:A year ago

#7

Dave Herod
Senior Programmer

517 734 1.4
He's not a customer, he's a development/business partner. This business involves lots of support from platform holders, negotiations and working together, so criticising someone you haven't finished working with isn't going to help anyone.

Posted:A year ago

#8

Patrick Frost
QA Project Monitor

387 180 0.5
Is no one else shocked that the Wii U wasnt mentioned? Surely considering the gameplay of The Witness it would have beeb a more suitable fit?

Posted:A year ago

#9

Aaron Brown
BA Computer Science Student

56 21 0.4
He forgot to mention the check that came with making the game a timed release. That probably made a bit of a difference...

Posted:A year ago

#10

Curt Sampson
Sofware Developer

595 345 0.6
He's not a customer, he's a development/business partner.
It makes little difference. Treating badly the partners whom you rely on for making your product attractive to customers is just as bad for your business as treating your customers badly. In fact, it is treating your customers badly. It's MS's responsibility to do what they need to do to get good games on to their console, and not to do a good job of this is a disservice to people who own that console.
...so criticising someone you haven't finished working with isn't going to help anyone.
I utterly disagree. But putting pressure on those in MS who are making decisions that reduce the number of games available on their platform, this may help everyone: developers, Xbox owners and MS themselves.

Posted:A year ago

#11

Adam Campbell
Associate Producer

1,136 914 0.8
@Dave

Getting distribution of your games, submission processes, dev kits etc aren't free. There comes a point where you have to pay a major corporation money and invest your time to get through their processes.

Microsoft are selling a platform and a service so to me it doesn't sound right to say he's not a customer. Those who buy the platform to play those games are also customers.

I have to re-enforce that he's nowhere near the first to be critical of a platform, console or software. Its these criticisms that make the service better. Many will be asking questions about what might be making PlayStation easier to get games out to compared to an Xbox. Of course, experiences vary but internally this won't be ignored. Usually these types of statements come from years of complaining and frustration building up. The publicity pushes for change.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Adam Campbell on 14th March 2013 10:08am

Posted:A year ago

#12

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now