Report Comment to a Moderator Our Moderators review all comments for abusive and offensive language, and ensure comments are from Verified Users only.
Please report a comment only if you feel it requires our urgent attention.
I understand, report it. Cancel

THQ files for bankruptcy protection, arranges sale

By Brendan Sinclair

THQ files for bankruptcy protection, arranges sale

Wed 19 Dec 2012 7:24pm GMT / 2:24pm EST / 11:24am PST

Publisher will continue operations uninterrupted as it plans to sell "substantially all" of its assets; Clearlake Capital Group offers $60 million package

THQ has voluntarily entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy as part of a process to sell off substantially all of its assets. The publisher today announced that it has entered into a deal with Clearlake Capital Group that will see the firm act as a "stalking horse bidder" for THQ.

Clearlake's offer totals roughly $60 million, although its stalking horse status means other parties can submit competing bids. If none do, THQ has asked the bankruptcy court to finalize the sale to Clearlake in 30 days.

THQ has said it will continue to operate as usual in the interim, pending court approval. The company's four studios will continue to operate, its employees will continue to be paid, and consumers and retail partners should not notice any changes. The publisher also specified that no layoffs are planned as part of the plan.

Through the sale process, THQ will be allowed "to shed certain legacy obligations and emerge with the strong financial backing of a new owner with substantial experience in software and technology." In conjunction with the sale, the publisher has also obtained financing commitments of about $37.5 million from Wells Fargo.

THQ indicated last month that it was negotiating "financing alternatives" with an unnamed sponsor. At the same time, the publisher announced that its CFO Paul Pucino was resigning from his post after four years, with no replacement named.

From Recommendations by Taboola


We all hope that Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection will force a better executive approach to business - I would also wish those in the studios to be 'sold' the best in the current conditions. I just wonder what this says about the viability of the current star system of publisher / developers - is there any good business examples - especially ones that do not have to depend on KS projects to fund their operation?

Posted:3 years ago


Paul Jace Merchandiser

1,201 2,054 1.7
I doubt anyone will offer more than 60 million for them as even thats probably atleast twice as much as what they are currently worth.

Posted:3 years ago


Andrew Goodchild Studying development, Train2Game

1,292 456 0.4
@Paul, not if it means they don't come with the debts that are driving the price down.

Posted:3 years ago


Greg Wilcox Creator, Destroy All Fanboys!

2,611 1,686 0.6
Damn. Lost another bet, as I thought they'd at LEAST make it into 2013 before this happened. Well, let;s hope the properties get picked up by good hands and are delivered to gamers as polished products. Hm. I should probably buy Darksiders II for the Wii U, as it's supposed to be quite good.

Posted:3 years ago


David Radd Senior Editor, IndustryGamers

361 80 0.2
I just hope that they remain afloat long enough that the South Park game comes out - that game has huge potential.

Posted:3 years ago


JT QA, Rockstar Lincoln

29 18 0.6
Metro: Last Light please quick!

Posted:3 years ago


Aaron Brown BA Computer Science Student, Carnegie Mellon University

67 29 0.4
I hope thq can stay afloat and remain relevant as a publisher in some way shape or form. There is definitely light over the horizon for them. Their confirmed IP Metro Last Light, Company of Heroes 2, and the South Park game all look like good games with solid profit potential.

Posted:3 years ago

>"The president of THQ says that the publisher's filing for bankruptcy protection and a proposed purchase by investment firm Clearlake Capital Group "does not mean the end of the THQ story or the end of the titles you love," in a letter to the community posted by Jason Rubin."

Edited 1 times. Last edit by kevin williams on 20th December 2012 2:34am

Posted:3 years ago


Shane Sweeney Academic

505 603 1.2
Well given another 30 years all the big video game publishers will be owned by the old media companies, is it time for the likes of a Disney or GE to buy a video games division?

Probably not yet.

Posted:3 years ago


Dan Howdle Head of Content, Existent

281 815 2.9
People's jobs, lives, livelihoods. That's what's important here.

Whether THQs games still make it out of the door is a secondary, comprehensible concern, but taking the role of 'Captain Hindsight' and assigning blame with I-told-you-so snarkiness is in, quite frankly, appalling taste.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Dan Howdle on 20th December 2012 8:13am

Posted:3 years ago

The potential positive is, THQ can offload and slim down and re emerge as a publisher/developer of quality games

Posted:3 years ago


Rick Lopez Illustrator, Graphic Designer

1,269 943 0.7
I am praying very hard for saints row 4...

Posted:3 years ago


Rick Lopez Illustrator, Graphic Designer

1,269 943 0.7
Im ok with the sale, I just hope whoever buys the company, leaves the temas and studios the same. They put ou really good games. i just think THQ just doesnt have the muscle to push there products out the door like activision or EA can. I clearly love Saints Row more than Grand Theft Auto. And Darksiders should get a 3rd game. I played Saints Row the 3rd twice, from beginning to end. And I really cant put it down. Sometimes Ill find myself popping it in my console again to give it a go.

Posted:3 years ago

I'm taking odds on:
- Atari
- Ubisoft
- Rockstar
- Activision

Posted:3 years ago


Laura Roberts Manager

6 0 0.0
Wishing the employees at THQ the best.

Posted:3 years ago


Greg Wilcox Creator, Destroy All Fanboys!

2,611 1,686 0.6
Well, Dan... maybe if things would change so that companies can't file for Chapter 11 until they help their soon to be former employees move onto new employment (even at the cost of the salaries of executives who often get a nice package and a safe, soft landing), there wouldn't be ANY shark.

Sure, I'm betting there's not too many CEO's and such who'd give up a year's pay (or more) or make investments in people over product so that the many working for and under them would be able to eat and pay rent after if they can't get a new job in a timely manner. That said, perhaps we'll see a shift to actual humane business practices (at leat in certain industries where no one cares about the little guy until they're losing their jobs)...

Posted:3 years ago


Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now