Close
Report Comment to a Moderator Our Moderators review all comments for abusive and offensive language, and ensure comments are from Verified Users only.
Please report a comment only if you feel it requires our urgent attention.
I understand, report it. Cancel

Critical Consensus: Surface

Critical Consensus: Surface

Wed 24 Oct 2012 10:19am GMT / 6:19am EDT / 3:19am PDT
Hardware

Microsoft's first non-console hardware and entry into the tablet market is a success, but only on the surface

The Surface is a significant device. There are many differences in opinion and numerical scoring among reviews of Microsoft's virgin attempt at PC hardware, but that's the one thing on which every critic agrees. A multitude of Android tablets has done little to weaken Apple's dominance in the market, and the imminent launch of the iPad Mini seems likely to solidify its position, but the Surface promises a new experience in more than just form factor.

It is a tablet for productivity, with full-featured apps based on Microsoft's Office suite, and a range of robust and smartly designed keyboards. It's a tablet for getting things done.

"If it ran Android, people might well conclude that it was the best Android tablet on the market"

Harry McCracken, Time Magazine

For The Wall Street Journal's Walt Mossberg, the hardware's first iteration has largely succeeded in its most prominent goal. Indeed, he open his review with a reminder that the very paragraph you are reading was typed and posted in a coffee shop, using the Surface.

"Microsoft has given the tablet the ability to behave like a familiar Windows PC, at least in some scenarios," he says. "It comes with full versions of standard Microsoft Word, Excel and PowerPoint. The three programs worked fine, in creating documents and in editing ones from older versions of the software.

"Microsoft has designed two clever, very thin, optional keyboards that snap on magnetically and double as covers. These are better than any of the add-on keyboards I've seen for the iPad. And Microsoft has built in a standard USB port and a sturdy kickstand for typing on a desk... These features make the Surface better for traditional productivity tasks than any tablet I've tested."

1

With Apple engaged in what seems like dozens of patent lawsuits all over the world, the importance of distinguishing a competing tablet from the iPad could not be more apparent. To a large extent, Microsoft has achieved this with the Surface, learning only from Apple's attention to design rather than mimicking the appearance of its products. Time Magazine's Harry McCracken is particularly impressed by how fully Microsoft has delivered in this area, calling the Surface "a beautiful piece of work" that is as aesthetically pleasing as an iPad despite making numerous original, "un-Apple-like" design choices.

The magnesium case is "good-looking" and "sturdy," allowing the Surface to house a considerably larger screen (10.6" versus the iPad's 9.7") without dramatically increasing its weight. Somewhat inevitably, that larger screen isn't as eye-wateringly sharp as the current iPad's retina-display, but the relatively minor gulf in visual fidelity does little to distract from the level of quality Microsoft has reached in the first iteration of the Surface hardware.

"Windows RT is delightfully gesture-friendly, and Microsoft has clearly spent much time thinking about and creating an entirely new interface"

Matthew Honan, Wired

"If it ran Android," McCracken writes, "people might well conclude that it was the best Android tablet on the market."

But it doesn't run Android; it runs Windows RT, a version of Windows 8 specifically optimised for tablets that represents a bold new direction for what has long been the core of Microsoft's business. However, while there are certain similarities between RT and Windows 8, and there is a more expensive Surface with Windows 8 due next year, Wired's Matthew Honan emphatically states that this version of the hardware, "is not a Windows 8 machine" - though even Microsoft seems to be confused on that matter.

"Which makes it curious that there is a Desktop mode at all," Honan states. "What is it there for? There are a handful of system applications and a suite of Office apps. But otherwise it seems like it's just going to cause confusion. The old Windows desktop is a very odd interface element on this device. I think Microsoft should have cleanly pulled the band-aid off and ditched the desktop metaphor altogether. Leave that for desktop computers.

"But in terms of interface elements, Windows RT works much like Windows 8. It is delightfully gesture-friendly, and Microsoft has clearly spent much time thinking about and creating an entirely new interface. Swapping between apps by swiping onto the screen from the left side, using semantic zoom to pinch and zoom out on all your on-screen elements, and the ability to kill running apps by dragging down from the top of the screen are all gestures I miss tremendously when using other devices. I have even found myself absent-mindedly trying to use them on other operating systems. And that's great. It means they work."

2

The Verge's Josh Topolsky is also impressed by Windows RT, which is fortunate, because in his view the Surface is, "defined by its operating system." Like Honan, Topolsky is puzzled by the inclusion of a desktop environment that seems to exist only to support five applications: Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote and Internet Explorer. When Microsoft has "expressly forbidden" third-party developers from creating apps for the Surface's "windowed, desktop environment," it seems odd that the Office suite wasn't just modified for the new touch-and-tile interface.

"I believe Microsoft could have wrapped all of this functionality in a cleaner and more user-friendly interface, thus keeping the user from shifting between two extremes," Topolsky writes. "Why the company chose to go the route it went is a mystery perhaps only Steve Ballmer himself could unravel.

"The actual interface - the tiled environment - is a joy to use. It's really, really cool. I found myself legitimately delighted by some of its functionality, particularly its multitasking and side-by-side apps concept."

"How is it possible that in launching a massively important device like this, Microsoft couldn't muster up a single killer game title to pull in the Xbox fanbase? Halo: Surface Edition, anyone?"

Josh Topolsky, The Verge

Trite statements are the enemy of a good review. If the critical evaluation of products is a key part of your day-to-day work, the ultimate goal is to make astute observations that have eluded your peers. With the Surface, however, the most significant problem - besides some bugs in many of the apps that are being steadily ironed out - appears in every single review, very often in the headline. Despite Microsoft's best effort to create hardware that stands apart from the competition and an OS that feels both personal and uniquely suited to the tablet form-factor, it cannot replicate the vast ecosystem of content that Apple has gathered after years of constant iteration on the iPhone and iPad hardware.

Is it reasonable to expect the Surface to compete with the latest iPad's performance and range of apps before it is even available to the public? Perhaps not, bit there's no avoiding how significant these factors will be when it comes to a consumer choosing between one tablet and another. The Surface may have solved these problems in three years time, but where will the iPad be at that point, or the Google Nexus 7, for that matter?

For Topolsky, the Surface's good points don't prevent it from being at a significant disadvantage right out of the gate, and he is left wondering if Microsoft could have done more.

"How is it possible that in launching a massively important device like this, Microsoft couldn't muster up a single killer game title to pull in the Xbox fanbase? Halo: Surface Edition, anyone?

"The whole thing is honestly perplexing. If this device is not as good as (or better than) the best tablet, and not a complete alternative to a laptop - who is this for? What is it supposed to be?

"There may be a time in the future when all the bugs have been fixed, the third-party app support has arrived, and some very smart engineers in Redmond have ironed out the physical kinks in this type of product which prevent it from being all that it can be. But that time isn't right now - and unfortunately for Microsoft, the clock is ticking."

14 Comments

Jma Programmer, Crytek

24 17 0.7
Great article, just a detail, "Microsoft's first non-console hardware" is not exactly right, they do have other hardware devices like mice, keyboards and the long forgotten Zune media player.

Posted:2 years ago

#1

Antoine EMOND Community Development Lead, Ubisoft

6 0 0.0
2 days left! <3

Posted:2 years ago

#2

Wojciech Mroczek Awesome Content Specialist, GOG.com

18 10 0.6
I was hoping for more from Surface. I'm not sure what is Microsoft's agenda regarding the gamers, but it seems that they want to push them toward Xbox, with limitations on games support and distribution of Windows 8, and no games designed with Surface in mind. I imagine that Microsoft has some kind of ecosystem in mind, where Xbox is the gaming/entertainment center with just minor connection to other devices via SmartGlass, the PC is focused on work stuff, and the mobile devices focus on... well... being mobile. I'm not sure if I like where this is going (given that my feelings are correct).

Posted:2 years ago

#3

Andrew Ihegbu Studying Bsc Commercial Music, University of Westminster

464 173 0.4
Wojciech, you make the mistake of seeing this through the media's rose tinted goggles. This is absolutely no different from Apple's decision to axe Rosetta, X11 and so much else from their OS with blatant disregard for legacy... but for one thing. Microsoft HAVE to.

Does everyone forget that Win32 has a 32 on the end that stands for 32bit? WinRT exists for two reasons:
1. Apple are collecting massive amounts of revenue from the iTunes/Appstore platform and MS must in response to stay competitive.
2. MS must move to ARM to compete in the mobile markets and thus needs everyone to recompile their apps anyway, making it a perfect opportunity to integrate everything they have recently earned about OS creation into a new runtime.
2a: that includes the importance of consistent UI design, something that can only work if it eschews older apps by making them incompatible, something Apple do yearly.
2b :If you factor in that everyone has to update their code to RT anyway, as they have announced intentions to phase out Win32, they will at the same time be recompiling it for mobile as the compiler writes for both and the store works on both, giving the Surface and other WinRT devices huge swathes of Apps.

Lot's of people say that UI and design isn't important enough to justify purging your entire back catalogue of programs. $100bn worth of Apple capital says you're completely wrong.

Posted:2 years ago

#4

Sam Brown Programmer, Cool Games Ltd.

235 164 0.7
But it doesn't run Android; it runs Windows RT
Give it a few weeks. :)

Posted:2 years ago

#5

Rod Oracheski Editor, Star News

58 23 0.4
I wonder if Surface will leave the desktop behind once the final version of the Office suite is out. It's nice to be able to use it as a file browser, but on a tablet I'd rather stay in the tablet-based OS.

Posted:2 years ago

#6

Nicholas Pantazis Senior Editor, VGChartz Ltd

1,020 1,467 1.4
Still waiting for pricing on the Surface Pro. I have no interest in the crippled RT.

Posted:2 years ago

#7

Fyzard Brown Sales Associate, VideoGameAdvantage

39 6 0.2
Don't really see the confusion. If you want a full operating system with legacy support for your back catalog get window 8. If you want a tablet get Windows RT. The confusion is from mainly from most people confusion the IPAD as a computer when it is nowhere near the power of Mac OS X. Windows RT makes a perfect blend of Tablet and Netbook. (Netlet/Tabbook) After playing with the tablet for a while I quickly renounced my Playbook (which I love to death except for the scarcity of apps) as my favorite tablet and plan on picking one of the RT Tablet to coincide with my $40 upgrade from Vista (Win7 didn't really pull me in, while trying it out) to Windows 8. This will also make it easier and beneficial for testing XNA(not dead yet) apps out for both.

Posted:2 years ago

#8

Adrian Herber

69 23 0.3
@Fyzard: I like Windows RT and really want it to succeed, but I am very worried about consumer confusion.

Microsoft insist on called both the 'Windows RT' and x86 versions 'Windows 8'. Beyond that, they both have the Metro UI and a desktop - just the Windows RT desktop can only run 5 specific MS apps.

So, with the same name and the same appearance how are consumers supposed to tell which one can run all their existing apps and which one can't?

Posted:2 years ago

#9

Bruce Everiss Marketing Consultant

1,692 594 0.4
Think of the user. This is a very useable device. As portable as a tablet but with the functionality of a laptop. This is a great combination.
Microsoft's new ecosystem will be a massive success, they are betting the company on it. Their tiles interface is superb and is ahead of iOS6. All they need is the apps and their horsepower is so vast that these will come.

Posted:2 years ago

#10

Edward Buffery Pre-production Manager

149 96 0.6
I don't like carrying a laptop around, so this looks like something I'd be delighted to work on, be happy to watch or browse on, and games would be an afterthought.

Posted:2 years ago

#11

Kieren Bloomfield Software Engineer, EA Sports

93 79 0.8
I'm really hoping for big things for this and the future of Windows in general. There's no denying the Win8 is going to be uncomfortable since it sits in that transition of having two mostly unconnected interfaces. It will take a while to transition over so that we don't need the old desktop. This is more of a problem for Microsoft than you might initially think. Many businesses don't run up to date software or even operating systems, the switch will be costly and take many years. But we do need as many people to embrace the new or we'll be stuck in limbo.

You can bet that MS are working on Metro versions of most of their productivity software. I'm sure it'll be quite slick when it's done, we're just not there yet.

Posted:2 years ago

#12

Paul Johnson Managing Director / Lead code monkey, Rubicon Development

896 1,337 1.5
Look out for Great Big War Game on it soon. Had some of these for a while now and they're great!

Posted:2 years ago

#13

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now