Close
Are you sure? Are you sure you want to report this comment? I understand, report it. Cancel

Are Parents Getting the Message On Online Gaming?

Are Parents Getting the Message On Online Gaming?

Tue 24 Apr 2012 7:15am GMT / 3:15am EDT / 12:15am PDT
OnlineMedia

A misleading hatchet job in the tabloid press shouldn't distract us from genuine risks to children who play online, says Johnny Minkley

"Xbox paedophile predators 'move in on prey within two minutes of contact'", screamed the Metro last Wednesday, the story making the front page of its dead-tree edition.

The morning commuter-bothering freesheet has form here, as the games industry well knows. A stable mate of the Daily Mail, it is after all the same publication that brought us the shocking news: "Video gaming lead to surge in rickets". Which proved as fair a reflection of the facts as one might have expected.

Signaling its intent to treat the latest games-related research it had no intention of reading properly with its customary bulletproof standards of accuracy, the paper illustrated the piece with an image of an original Xbox.

Given the seriousness of the issue it shouldn't be allowed to distract from an examination of the source

Gamers and the games press reacted to it not with self-righteous anger, but wearied resignation. Conditioned as the industry is to hysterical tabloid scapegoating, our Pavlovian response is to sigh then sneer.

But even if we feel we have good reason to resist taking the Metro's account at face value, given the seriousness of the issue it shouldn't be allowed to distract from an examination of the source.

The European Online Grooming Project Report was produced by a team of researchers at London's Kingston University. It seems the Metro based its piece solely on the press release that accompanied last week's publication - which features the word "paedophile" in the headline and "Xbox" and "PlayStation" in the body - jackpot, in other words, for hacks desperately scanning the wires for something to cut and paste.

In the release, one of the authors of the report, Professor Julia Davidson, explained that predatory online chat can "become sexualised within two minutes". The release added that "the report highlights how gaming platforms, such as Xbox Live and PlayStation Network are also used to target children, particularly boys."

Kingston Uni's press office told me last week that the Metro's "headline was very misleading", but added: "The report focuses on all online gaming, not just Xbox Live, as well as social networking."

Indeed, the authors of the research revealed that they found evidence of online gaming services being used for grooming. Here's the key relevant findings taken from the full 152-page document:

"Online game platforms were used by some men that were attempting to groom young boys. Grooming via game platforms helped to reinforce the fantasy aspect of offending behaviour and gave the men credibility in the eyes of the young men being approached."

"In some respect, this approach represents a 'rational choice' for men sexually interested in boys, as the evidence suggests that young men tend to be online playing games more than young females."

"There are two dimensions of online gaming that made this method an attractive place to target young people. The first was that playing a game, such as online role- play, helped to reinforce the fantasy, or 'unreal' aspect of what is clearly offending behavior."

"The second dimension relates to online gaming performance reinforcing the credibility of the offender as somebody worth talking to. That is, being competent at online games and 'leveling up' by gaining experience points means a great deal to some online players. Consequently, some offenders talked about how they could use their considerable online scores as a way to 'attract' and open up conversations with some young boys."

Horrible stuff. And while none of us is likely to be surprised that gaming - as with any other connected service - is being exploited by sexual predators, these details stand out: that would-be groomers are somehow able to delude themselves into believing what they're doing is harmless because of the "fantasy" aspect of gaming; and that having good game stats facilitates contact.

Grooming via game platforms helped to reinforce the fantasy aspect of offending behaviour and gave the men credibility in the eyes of the young men being approached

The European Online Grooming Project Report

The games industry has been ahead of the tech curve in taking measures to protect children. All modern gaming systems feature parental controls as standard - sensible, well-designed means with which to prevent kids from accessing content inappropriate for their age and from engaging in online contact.

And there's good practical advice and information out there, from organisations including the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre, The UK Council For Child Internet Safety (formed in the wake of the Byron Review), and UKIE - if you know where to look for it.

But, as I wrote here recently in relation to age ratings, the real problem remains that too many parents either don't know parental controls are there or don't bother to use them, and see video games as inherently harmless virtual babysitters.

It's all too easy to be knee-jerk dismissive of the sensationalist anti-gaming agenda that persists in the tabloid press, which usually has little interest in the facts of the story itself beyond a trolling headline. But that doesn't mean there's no story.

Rapidly evolving technologies, playgrounds full of smartphones and a preponderance of confusing social networks give parents plenty to worry about. Meanwhile, the sheer number of children allowed to play 18-rated games highlights how interactive entertainment is viewed and treated differently to other media.

And so the disturbing details of Kingston University's research send out a strong signal to the UK games industry as it prepares its awareness campaign to support the legal switch to PEGI, now due this summer: it must also be used to raise awareness of the potential risks of online gaming. That's the responsibility not just of the games industry, but also bodies such as UKCCIS. The advice needs to be clear, the message visible.

Because if mature-rated content alone isn't enough reason for parents to pay closer attention to what their kids are doing on games consoles, this snapshot of an interview with a paedophile, quoted in Kingston's research, ought to give pause:

"I spent a lot of time playing (name of online war game) with boys. I was good, it was a 'shoot em up' (UK participant, male victims age 5-12)."

11 Comments

Andreas Gschwari
Senior Games Designer

555 607 1.1
To be fair the original article mentions primarily the internet as a whole and social networking sites. Xbox Live is only mentioned in passing:

"Sexual predators are taking advantage of young people’s willingness to add strangers as online contacts out of a sense of ‘competition’ over their popularity.


They are also increasingly likely to use gaming platforms such as Xbox Live to target children, researchers say."

Of course the headline and image used don't help.

It's interesting to read your piece Johnny, because the first half almost reads like a metro article (with exageration and not covering all the facts - the image is an xbox slim i believe, not an original). While the second half of your article is pretty much spot on.

Posted:2 years ago

#1

Neil Young
Programmer

269 294 1.1
The "report"->"press release"->"coverage" chinese whispers issue is a general one - print journalists lack the time to check much beyond the press release, which will often have been written by someone from the institution's press team rather than one of the researchers, and is intended to publicise the report rather than necessarily document it.

Posted:2 years ago

#2

Tommy Thompson
Lecturer in BSc (Hons) Computer Games Programming.

44 26 0.6
@Neil: I think you give journalists a lot more credit than they deserve. There's a difference between a lack of proper investigation for an article and simply twisting someone's words to make a story. It's tabloids like the Daily Mail that revel in exactly that sort of nonsense.

While I can imagine this is happening, as horrific as it is, my mind still can't get around the idea of *not* hearing a screaming 15 year old make less than polite statements about my mothers heritage when on Xbox Live.

Posted:2 years ago

#3
Re: X-box slim - I heard that the article image was altered after complaints that it was the original model. Of course I only heard that on the internet so it could be wrong.

Posted:2 years ago

#4
" the image is an xbox slim i believe, not an original"

The article has been modified since it was first published.

Posted:2 years ago

#5

Andreas Gschwari
Senior Games Designer

555 607 1.1
Ah ok - apologies then :)

Posted:2 years ago

#6

Liam Farrell

66 13 0.2
and why would sex predators want to pick up potential prey on LIVE? Have you heard the way some of those kids talk?

Posted:2 years ago

#7

Rick Cody
PBnGames-Board Member

144 14 0.1
The problem with parental controls is in the name itself. A parent controlling a child doesn't help anyone, child included. There should be an option to send parents emails when their son or daughter adds a friend or is messaged by someone for the first time on whatever platform it may be.
Allow the parent to oversee their child's activities without actually limiting them in any way.

Posted:2 years ago

#8

Tony Johns

520 12 0.0
They forgot to mention about online Trolls and people stealing your information online to use for scams.

Posted:2 years ago

#9

Neil Young
Programmer

269 294 1.1
@Tommy Didn't mean that journalists aren't largely at fault, was just meaning that there was a systemic flaw as well as opportunity for editorial bias.

Posted:2 years ago

#10

Thomas Dolby
Project Manager / Lead Programmer

329 277 0.8
I wish the first half of this article didn't stoop close to their level, the games industry needs to take the higher ground when defending itself so at least those who look into both sides of the argument can see who is sensationalist and who is rational.

Posted:2 years ago

#11

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now