Close
Are you sure? Are you sure you want to report this comment? I understand, report it. Cancel

Anti-SOPA movement gathering support from tech community

Fri 13 Jan 2012 9:29am GMT / 4:29am EST / 1:29am PST
OnlineLegal

Wikipedia, NVIDIA, Anonymous and Reddit reject bill along with developers

Runic Games

Based in Seattle WA, Runic Games was founded in August 2008 by Travis Baldree, Max Schaefer, Erich Schaefer...

runicgames.com

The movement opposing SOPA, the US bill designed to counter online piracy of copyrighted material, has garnered further support from the tech and gaming industries, alongside campaigns from Anonymous and Reddit.

NVIDIA has publicly rejected the bill, claiming that whilst it supports the anti-piracy movement, it does not believe that SOPA is an appropriate solution. NVIDIA's declaration also implies some criticism of the Entertainment Software Association, which issued public support for the bill, for not consulting its members first.

Torchlight developer Runic has also added its voice, as did League of Legends studio Riot games, yesterday.

In support of the campaign, link site and social network Reddit has organised a 'blackout' on January 18, during which it will suspend the normal operation of its website, which sees 2 billion page views and 35 million users a month - replacing all pages with a message explaining the implications of SOPA.

One of those implications, the founders of the site believe, would be to close down sites such as Reddit.

"Instead of the normal glorious, user-curated chaos of Reddit," reads a message on the site, "we will be displaying a simple message about how the PIPA/SOPA legislation would shut down sites like Reddit, link to resources to learn more, and suggest ways to take action.

"We will showcase the live video stream of the House hearing where Internet entrepreneurs and technical experts (including Reddit co-founder Alexis 'kn0thing' Ohanian) will be testifying. We will also spotlight community initiatives like meet-ups to visit Congressional offices, campaigns to contact companies supporting PIPA/SOPA, and other tactics."

Anarchic hacking activist collective Anonymous has added its support to the 12 hour blackout, issuing a call to action for its members and sympathisers worldwide.

In response to the blackout, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has been considering whether to show solidarity by following suit with the online encyclopedia, offering considerable mainstream credence to the cause and helping to co-ordinate resistance to the bill's passing.

Also onside with the movement is Firefox developer Mozilla, which has made a public statement of support, encouraging readers and users to join the cause.

Individual developers have also pledged allegiance to the anti-SOPA movement, including Funzio's Jamil Moledina and Playmesh's Shawn Foust, who offer a more in-depth, albeit light-hearted, assessment of the concerns of the group on their industry blog, calling SOPA a "nuclear option" which goes way beyond the powers necessary for the prevention of IP infringement.

Mark Gerhard, head of Cambridge-based studio Jagex, recently acquired by a US parent, has also denounced the proposed law, pointing out that not only would it be harmful to the freedom of informational flow which sites like Wikipedia have come to represent, it would also be potentially damaging to the games industry.

"Jagex is fervently opposed to the to the proposed 'Stop Online Piracy Act', which is will essentially create a national censorship firewall for American internet users, specifically this could crush the community element of online gaming and could result in a huge lack of freedom of speech, creativity and opinion sharing," said Gerhard in a statement to press.

"The SPOA seems to have taken the page from China's internet management book. "There has been much already stated about the impact on social networking sites, but ultimately secondary to providing compelling games we also provide a social platform for our own community which would be equally affected. This legislation could have a hugely negative impact on that community, even to the extent of forum activity or in-game chat.

"Not only would this effect freedom of speech and quickly dispatch with websites such as Wikileaks, Youtube and probably Wikipedia but worse yet it would actually undermine current improvements to internet security."

Gerhard is also quick to point out the fact that the proposed legislation would not only be dangerous and oppressive, it could also prove to be ineffective in its main aims.

"This measure will prevent the rollout of DNSSEC, which will weaken security and cause no appreciable effectiveness or enforcement for the ardent users they are hoping to target with blacklisted domain names," the CEO continues.

"Namely because it could all be simply circumvented by going straight to the IP address of the blocked domain eg. http://82.211.114.127 instead of www.runescape.com or alternatively simply use proxy servers to access the content outside of the USA. There is every likelihood that the vast majority of internet users who are law abiding will find access to content censored and the minority of offending users will circumvent the planned measures and remain unaffected.

"If the main lobbyists behind SOPA which I understand are the US Music and Film industries truly hope to protect their intellectual property in an online world, then they need to evolve from their retail based and downloadable content models and be part of the new online ecosystem, streaming their content on demand as we have done for over 10 years to prevent piracy of our games, certainly not go about changing laws with sweeping adverse impact on innovation and freedom of speech."

The SOPA bill is due to be discussed in the US house of congress on January 16, where both industry and political figures will discuss its practicalities.

12 Comments

That should be "implies" in the second paragraph. "Infer" is what you've done with their implication.

Posted:2 years ago

#1

David Spender
Lead Programmer

129 54 0.4
Its good they are including the Senate's Protect-IP act which is just as bad. Some people are worried that SOPA is getting a lopsided amount of attention and PIPA might slip though the Senate. We would be in the same situation we are in now.

Posted:2 years ago

#2

Dan Pearson
European Editor

101 234 2.3
@Sebastian - You're absolutely right. I even thought about that first and meant to write 'implies', but obviously short circuited somewhere in between that thought and the typing of it.

Posted:2 years ago

#3

Andrzej Wroblewski
Localization Generalist

102 69 0.7
Instead of SOPA -- the US government should pass a law protecting authors and their right to profit from their IP from corporations.

Posted:2 years ago

#4

John Chalkley
Games Consultant

2 0 0.0
Upvote

Posted:2 years ago

#5

Frederic Eichinger
Web Developer

33 27 0.8
[link url=http://twitter.com/#!/notch/status/157865002177536001
]http://twitter.com/#!/notch/status/15786...[/link]

Another one, by the way.

Other than that, it's still quite surprising to still see the ESA without a valuable statement ...

Posted:2 years ago

#6

Daniel Vardy
Studying HND IT

90 1 0.0
Money buys you laws in the USA, and the country deserves a president who is willing to disband congress and tell the people that it is bought. There is no logical reason why a bill with so much public opposition is still being looked at.

Posted:2 years ago

#7

Jamie Watson
Studying Bachelor of Games & Interactive Entertainment

179 0 0.0
if this gets passed i can only fear what other countries may take this style of law onboard..

i hope it doesn't,but im afraid it will.

Posted:2 years ago

#8

Tony Johns

520 12 0.0
I knew that politicians would only listen to people with the money.

Sadly they never really listen to the majority of people, only those who have the money....

In the end, once when the politicians of today are replaced by future politicians who were part of the internet experience will bills like the SOPA be rejected from the books of history.

Posted:2 years ago

#9

Preet D Bass
student

92 13 0.1
This law is only for the greedy CEOs that think they earned a $1 less per year. This law is not against piracy, its against our freedom. If that is not the case why so much support and on the other hand why is there so much support against it

Posted:2 years ago

#10

Curtis Kwong
Unknown

2 0 0.0
I'm with Jagex on this one.
Please note: if you played R.S. (RuneScape), please add me is Simbaha1.
Thanks

Posted:2 years ago

#11

Henrique Olifiers
Gamer-In-Chief, Co-Founder

12 7 0.6
How bad things have to be at ESA for them to continue to support SOPA/PIPA -- it's not naivety or just downright ignorance, since the arguments are now clear for anyone to see. SOPA/PIPA are evil, and so is ESA for aligning itself with it.

It's impossible to understand how a body representing a cutting-enge industry like ours can behave in such a reckless way, even after most (if not all) the companies who compose this very body are against what it's siding with.

As members of the games industry, we all should start taking a closer look at what ESA has been doing lately and plan to to next in all fronts, not just copyright. The support for SOPA/PIPA cannot be their single exceptionally bad decision, there must be more to be discovered.

Posted:2 years ago

#12

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now