Close
Are you sure? Are you sure you want to report this comment? I understand, report it. Cancel

EA wins dismissal in NCAA lawsuit

Mon 12 Sep 2011 8:21am GMT / 4:21am EDT / 1:21am PDT
LegalPublishing

Judge rules in favour of publisher on grounds of First Amendment protection

The lawsuit between Electronic Arts and former Rutgers University quarterback Ryan Hart has been been dismissed.

Hart accused the publisher of using his likeness without permission in its NCAA Football series, mimicking his physical attributes, uniform number and personal history for the nameless quarterback in Rutgers University's line-up.

However, according to Reuters, US District Judge Freda Wolfson ruled that EA's First Amendment rights outweighed Hart's right to control the use of his image.

In her ruling, Wolfson cited the ability to significantly modify the avatar's appearance, abilities and team as grounds for rejecting Hart's claim. She also mentioned that NCAA regulations prevent its players from entering licensing and commercial agreements.

Elizabeth McNamara, a lawyer for EA, claimed that the decision, "validates Electronic Arts' rights to create and publish its expressive works."

Hart's lawyer, Tim McIlwain, called the decision "a major disappointment," and insisted that EA, "engaged in the absolute taking of my client's persona."

"Millions of dollars are being made, and he's not getting his part of that pot. How is this allowed to happen?"

2 Comments

Kevin Clark-Patterson
Lecturer in Games Development

288 23 0.1
1 vs. 100 springs to mind here. (Hart Vs. EA)

A likeness is one thing but a generic football player whose can be customisable? Plus the fact that as a NCAA player he has no channel or right to receive royalties as per their rules...

How did this even get to court?!

Posted:2 years ago

#1

Jeffrey Davis
Freelance Writer

1 0 0.0
LOL!!! You're telling me...

But the important thing is that in the U.S. justice system, the right of people (and corporate America, of course) to have an opportunity to model anything (subject, beliefs or in this case a simulated athlete) to whatever standards they uphold individually is a fundamental public right when analyzed from a constitutional standpoint. So basically, EA is most certainly within the accuracy of the legal framework to do whatever the hell they intend to do in a sports simulation game, NCAA policies be damned. So yeah, go ahead and call it "persona taking" if you feel that way, but the overall game design (simulated players and everything else) is EA's call to make, no matter what anyone else says.

Edited 2 times. Last edit by Jeffrey Davis on 15th September 2011 3:40am

Posted:2 years ago

#2

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now