Report Comment to a Moderator Our Moderators review all comments for abusive and offensive language, and ensure comments are from Verified Users only.
Please report a comment only if you feel it requires our urgent attention.
I understand, report it. Cancel

Maroon 5 singer sues Activision

By Rachel Weber

Fri 05 Aug 2011 9:33am GMT / 5:33am EDT / 2:33am PDT

Adam Levine unhappy with his role in Band Hero

Activision Blizzard

Headquartered in Santa Monica, California, Activision Blizzard, Inc. is a worldwide pure-play online...


Activision Publishing

Activision, Inc. is a leading international publisher of interactive entertainment software products....

Maroon 5 front man Adam Levine is suing Activision over his the use of his likeness in music game Band Hero.

The singer alleged that while he performed both the hit song She Will Be Loved and provided motion capture for the game, he was not aware he avatar could be used to perform other musician's tracks.

Levine also claimed that he received a lower fee than other Band Hero artists.

According to The Wrap, Levine is seeking damages for breach of contract, fraudulent inducement, violation of the common-law right of publicity, and unfair business acts or practices.

Activision has so far failed to comment on the lawsuit.

Last year No Doubt filed a similar lawsuit against Activision over Band Hero.

From Recommendations by Taboola


Andrew Goodchild Studying development, Train2Game

1,292 456 0.4
Now whether he was mislead into thinking he would only be performing his own song, that is an issue. This should have been laid out in a contract clearly, I'm guessing it perhaps wasn't clear enough not to leave room for interpretation.

However, "Levine also claimed that he received a lower fee than other Band Hero artists."

Well as long as he was paid the figure he or his agent on his behalf agreed to, it's irrelevent. If people got paid more it's because they either a) were seen as a bigger draw or b) had an agent who was better at negotiating price. So for that one blame your agent, the money was obviously enough for the appearence (or at least allowing for the other part, what he thought the appearence was) before he found out what others were on, and frankly, I'd expect some artists to command a higher fee due to demand, profile and brand.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Andrew Goodchild on 5th August 2011 11:51am

Posted:5 years ago


Tommy Thompson Studying Artificial Intelligence (PhD), University of Strathclyde

110 0 0.0
A bit late isn't he? Band Hero came out 2 years ago right?

I agree with Andrew, it's only whether it was indicated the avatar would perform other artists songs that is an issue.

Posted:5 years ago


Rick Lopez Illustrator, Graphic Designer

1,269 943 0.7
Its easy to understand why the gaming industry stopped making music games. You know what it is, as the developer to wake up every morning to have one of these spoiled brats up your ass demanding more money. The music gaming genere probably gave these musicians more publicity and exposure then ever. Especially to kids who werent even born or raised listening to their music. As a developer Id say "Screw music games!" So much legal crap behind it, it really is not worth it.

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Rick Lopez on 5th August 2011 1:33pm

Posted:5 years ago


Aleksi Ranta Product Manager - Hardware

384 313 0.8
Mo money, mo problems...

Posted:5 years ago

All music content licensing deals comes under even the small unknown bands on a compilation get the same fee as the big boys...not that MFN was ever invented to use as a price fixing instrument, but rather to deal with international trade between nations...
Anyway, I am 100% sure he has a MFN clause in his contract, and if it hasnt been respected, he has the right to get the same as the best paid other contracted artist/band on the same product...

Posted:5 years ago


Kevin Patterson musician

199 111 0.6
As a musician, I was disgusted to see Kurt Cobain singing Play that funky music in Guitar hero. Maybe Kurt would laughed, we will never know, but i thought it was disrespectful. I can understand not liking having your image available to perform songs that are way different than your style. I can't imagine them doing this to Danzig lol.

Posted:5 years ago


Andrew Goodchild Studying development, Train2Game

1,292 456 0.4
@Andrew McFain re."learn to read a contract"

I would assume it's not that simple. If these things were explicitly detailed in contract, surely they wouldn't have much of a case to begin with?

Posted:5 years ago


Alex Bunch Proof Reader, ZiCorp Studios

103 145 1.4
Always seems to be the artists heading towards the dumper (copyright Smash Hits 1985) that sue.

Posted:5 years ago


Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now