Close
Are you sure? Are you sure you want to report this comment? I understand, report it. Cancel

PS3 seizures order lifted, LG fined €130,000

Thu 10 Mar 2011 7:01pm GMT / 2:01pm EST / 11:01am PST
Hardware

But legal proceedings continue with LG seeking $2.55 for every Blu-ray device sold

Sony Computer Entertainment

Sony Computer Entertainment is a Japanese videogame company specialising in a variety of areas in the...

playstation.com

Sony has won the first round of a legal battle with LG over a Blu-ray patent infringement, with a court in the Hague lifting a prejudgment seizure order on PlayStation 3 stock.

All PlayStation 3 units will now be freed and LG has been ordered to pay a fine of €130,000. For every day LG does not pay, the fine will be increased by €200,000.

According to the fosspatents blog, verifying reports by InsideGamer.nl and gamer.nl, Sony is free to distribute consoles across Europe - initially 300,000 units were seized at a value of €43 million. Sony is now expected to move another nine shipments of between 15,000-20,000 units each into Europe.

The latest order only concerns the prejudgement seizure and not the wider ongoing case, in which LG is seeking a royalty payment of between $2.50-$2.55 for each Blu-ray device sold by Sony.

There are already 47 million PlayStation 3 units sold globally, with other Sony hardware containing Blu-ray technology and allegedly infringing on patents. LG estimates that Sony already owes it up to $180 million for for devices sold.

16 Comments

Oopsie =P

Fine is probably MUCH less than what Sony lost during this time though

Edited 1 times. Last edit by Jehferson Wohllerz Curupana da Rocha e Mello on 10th March 2011 7:12pm

Posted:3 years ago

#1

Private
Industry

1,176 182 0.2
Given that retailers apparently had enough stock to last for several weeks they shouldn`t have lost anything so far.

If somebody would now please stop both lawsuits so the mobile phone one and the Blu Ray one as both seem to rely on rather generic patents that way more companies would violate that would be much appreciated.

Posted:3 years ago

#2

Barrie Tingle
Live Producer

372 145 0.4
LG won a court ruling to seize PS3's as they entered Europe and now another ruling is slapping them with a fine for doing that?

Posted:3 years ago

#3

Terence Gage
Freelance writer

1,288 120 0.1
I agree with Barrie - if this action was declared legitimate by the initial court ruling, why are LG now being fined?!

I still don't really understand the point in pre-judgement rulings -- surely the legal system should adhere to the 'innocent until proven guilty' mentality?

Posted:3 years ago

#4

Antony Carter
Programmer

85 47 0.6
I dont think LG won the first court ruling they just applied for it, if the courts then judge that it was wrong for them to do that they have to pay damages.

Posted:3 years ago

#5

John Donnelly
Quality Assurance

313 38 0.1
Werner, while retailers may have had 2-3 weeks of stocks the timelines to get from landing in Holland to the store shelves can take a few days to a week or more depending on the supply networks and what not.

This is why it was a big deal to get the seizure order lifted as the knock on impact of a 10 day hold on stock means the supply network is 10 days behind where it expects to be at this time of the year.

Posted:3 years ago

#6

James Prendergast
Research Chemist

735 432 0.6
@Barrie and Terence:

As Antony said, if you waste a court's time or the initial ruling is considered unlawful based on false information/pretenses (something that a judge cannot always tell because in this case there wasn't a hearing) then, yes, the applicant can be fined - and rightly so!

Things/assets are seized all the time if something fishy is suspected and then allowed to be analysed. The company/individuals are still free and innocent but cannot smuggle away or hide any inconsistencies or bad behaviour... which is why they occur. It's sort of like a druggie flushing his stash down the toilet during a raid. ;)

Posted:3 years ago

#7

Jim Webb
Executive Editor/Community Director

2,265 2,399 1.1
We read about sales injunctions being applied for several times a year but this is one of the first in the video game industry I've heard of in a long time that was granted. Now once it's been granted, I cannot see how LG can be fined. If the courts didn't have sufficient information to warrant the sales seizure, they should never have granted it in the first place. But turning around and slapping them with a fine after the fact sounds like a quick way for the courts to make a buck themselves.

Posted:3 years ago

#8

Terence Gage
Freelance writer

1,288 120 0.1
I agree with Jimmy's post; if the courts didn't have enough information to make a proper decision then no decision should have been made at all. If LG lied and/or provided false information then that's a different matter, but ultimately it just seems to re-enforce the notion that this pre-judgement ruling was nonsense and should not have been made at all.

Posted:3 years ago

#9

Andrew Goodchild
Studying development

1,240 400 0.3

LG actually made the statement that if the ban was found to be wrong, Sony would recieve compensation, it's not something they entered blindly.

Posted:3 years ago

#10

Jas Purewal
Solicitor

35 0 0.0
Sometimes commercial disputes move so fast that the parties can't wait until trial for a judge to determine who is right and who is wrong. Sometimes they need help from the court during the course of the dispute. Let's say, for example, company A believes company B has infringed its intellectual property by making a rival game - which threatens Company A's survival. So Company A applies to court to freeze the sale by company B of the rival games.

In these kinds of situations, the judge has to balance the uncertainty of not knowing who is right with the potential injustice of doing nothing and let the consequences of the dispute ruin someone's business. So, in these situations, sometimes a judge will grant an order to help one of the parties even before the full facts have been determined. This is what happened for LG.

However, the court also wants to be even-handed. Therefore, if later on, with the benefit of a full investigation of the facts and law, it is established that the applicant was wrong to seek the interim order, it will be liable for damages to the other side - which has happened just now.

Posted:3 years ago

#11

Jeffrey Kesselman
CTO

112 0 0.0
Europe has sane laws that punish people for frivolous law-suits.

We need more of that in the US.

Posted:3 years ago

#12

Bruno Brøsted
Incident Manager

22 0 0.0
I'm pretty sure the rulings have only been about Holland and not Europe. A judge in Holland can't make rulings about anything outside of Holland and even if that would then be the EU and not Europe.
Europe includes much than the EU like for example Switzerland and part of Russia to name just two countries certain not to follow rulings made in Holland :-)

Posted:3 years ago

#13

Private
Industry

1,176 182 0.2
Even for the countries that are part of the EU they have all different patent laws and a single ruling wouldn`t work.

On an off topic note: Obviously that lawsuit is now the smallest problem for Sony. And while it`s a site about the games industry I`m kind of surprised that there was nothing about the situation in Japan given that so many companies are from Japan and the possibility of the impact. Square already had to shut down the game servers to preserve electricity same for Konami and Motorstorm has been of course delayed and I wouldn`t be surprised if the next Yakuza game is going to be delayed given the destructive theme of it or if any other games are going to get delayed because of the crisis and electricity problems.

Edited 2 times. Last edit by Private on 13th March 2011 11:54pm

Posted:3 years ago

#14

Terence Gage
Freelance writer

1,288 120 0.1
@ Werner

I was watching some extensive news reports last night, and I was wondering what the impact would be for Japanese publishers. I guess it will be weeks before the extent of the damage and its industrial impacts will become clear.

It's a terrible tragedy of course, and I wish everyone affected the best. I don't wish to sound cold by focusing on the Japanese videogame industry.

Posted:3 years ago

#15

Private
Industry

1,176 182 0.2
It is certainly a huge tragedy and still ongoing with the issues there and I know several people in the country who are "lucky" and are on Tokyo or south of it to not have to experience the full extend of it. Looking at the videos on TV certainly isn`t easy given the huge destruction and I got already my heart pumping when experiencing a earthquake only around 5.6 that lasted only a few seconds so that must be horrible with that big one and so many aftershocks above 6. But the games industry is still a big part of the country and again what happened is horrible and there are certainly more important things for the country now it`s still a valid topic for a site that focuses on that business. Don`t deny it could be seen as cold or inappropriate, but there isn`t much that can be done about it by the people here except to donate to the red cross and so on to help the people there.

Posted:3 years ago

#16

Login or register to post

Take part in the GamesIndustry community

Register now